- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
- Posts
- 1,137
- Media
- 40
- Likes
- 3,667
- Points
- 543
- Location
- United States
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 80% Gay, 20% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Well that's actually kinda my point. Even forgetting the fact that ruler pics can be faked, I don't think the numbers are really important. A big cock is big because of someone's perception of it being big. Some would think a 7" cock is big, others might consider a 9 incher to be necessary for qualification as big. It's all relative to expectations and individual perception.
Maybe they are afraid of the truth...:tongue:I still don't get why people don't just pull out a ruler and let the numbers speak for themselves. crazy.
Was "perfect" an option? :biggrin1:
I'm not and would agree :tongue:Your biased! :biggrin1:
LOL
Does anyone else find this funny:
(No offense to anyone on this, just strikes me funny)
Do you think the fact that so many women have told men that they are "Average", and most men assume 6" is average, that so many men think they are actually 6"?
I myself am not huge, only 8". But when I am with another guy that says he is 6", it makes me look like I have 10" or more, because they are only actually 3-4".
I'm not and would agree :tongue:
Well that's actually kinda my point. Even forgetting the fact that ruler pics can be faked, I don't think the numbers are really important. A big cock is big because of someone's perception of it being big. Some would think a 7" cock is big, others might consider a 9 incher to be necessary for qualification as big. It's all relative to expectations and individual perception.
Really?I don't think it helps sometimes that confusion arises over whether it is the erect or flaccid inches that are being discussed
Well that's actually kinda my point. Even forgetting the fact that ruler pics can be faked, I don't think the numbers are really important. A big cock is big because of someone's perception of it being big. Some would think a 7" cock is big, others might consider a 9 incher to be necessary for qualification as big. It's all relative to expectations and individual perception.
Really?Until I came to this site I never thought about or even discussed a mans flaccid length because it doesn't matter. As a woman the only thing that matters is his erect length. I don't give a crap about his soft size, cause I know that's going to change. :biggrin: TruckerTexman is a spectacular grower, I like that. :smile:
I still don't get why people don't just pull out a ruler and let the numbers speak for themselves. crazy.
The world standard sized household objects (e.g. Gillette cans) seem to be about the best and least "fakeable" from my observation.
Does anyone else find this funny:
(No offense to anyone on this, just strikes me funny)
Do you think the fact that so many women have told men that they are "Average", and most men assume 6" is average, that so many men think they are actually 6"?
I myself am not huge, only 8". But when I am with another guy that says he is 6", it makes me look like I have 10" or more, because they are only actually 3-4".
So I beg, ladies, and men who are trying to be polite, be honest with the guy if he's not that big. Otherwise you have them convinced they actually have 6", and are setting them up for some embarrassing situations later on.