The Abundance Of Huge Dicks Online

icebergslm5506

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Posts
427
Media
1
Likes
3,160
Points
598
Location
District of Columbia (United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I mainly watch amateur porn, as it usually turns me on more than the professional pornstars’ work. What I’ve noticed is that in every video, the guys seem to be bigger than even most professional porn stars. Even on Twitter, the amateur porn dedicated pages, or people just posting their own work, every single video has a guy with what looks like 9 inches. If the average is 5-7, why do you think there seems to be no shortage of hung amateur content even more than there seems to be “normal” sized ones out there?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rewardheragain148

Cum_is_Great

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 25, 2006
Posts
5,281
Media
95
Likes
11,782
Points
493
Location
Connecticut (United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Because guys who know they have a big dick are MUCH more likely to post content than those who are average.

Also cameras now make it very easy to exaggerate how size looks. Wide lenses are standard now and more and more people are learning how to take pics and video at the right angles.

Also, the big dick amateur videos are the popular ones and get the clicks and views which then get put into attention of others which make more views. Now all you see are the big dick amateur videos. The average and smaller ones are stuck with 10 views and you don't even know they exist. They are put of sight by the algorithm and view count.

Edit: Also a lot of the professional porn stars are now "amateur" as well. Posting cell videos of themselves in a more amateur self made video style. Many gay porn stars at least now make their own content and post on Twitter and Onlyfans seemingly "amateur"
 

fournineteenfiftynine

Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Posts
1,470
Media
10
Likes
1,758
Points
593
Location
Minneapolis (Minnesota, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I just think there are way more substantial dicks out there than the often quoted statistics say. First I think gay men are on average about 1 inch bigger than straight men. There have been some studies on this. So that would put well over half of all gay men are bigger than 6 inches. And a 6 inch thick dick can look pretty big both in person and on video. So if you think a dick bigger than 6 inches especially if thick is a substantial and sizable dick than well there you have it.
 

marriedasian

Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2008
Posts
1,578
Media
1
Likes
2,020
Points
343
Location
Wisconsin (United States)
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
it's probably too premature to make this blanket statement that huge dicks are in abundance when they most likely are not compared to the masses. you'd have to look at the data to make a more accurate discussion on the topic. i agree with @Cum_is_Great in that porn websites will send videos that you watch more your way to get more clicks.

the website algorithm does this on purpose. so if you like to watch fish videos, the site will send a lot of fish videos your way and after a while of watching only fish videos, your brain is trained to think that everyone loves to fish because "look at all these videos of people fishing!"... even if you watched a million fishing videos, there's a billion non-fishing videos out there which would prove my point.

also, once our brain is trained, we tend to avoid "any other video than" the videos we like therefore reinforces our mentality and wishful thinking that big dicks are everywhere! lols, i digress...

i remember talking to a lady at a swing club once who shared with me that the majority of men loved to get pegged and that they were all secretly closet-gays... i had to set her straight with some logical thought-process that just because she continues to hang out with men (and she hung out with A LOT of them) that like to get pegged doesn't mean she can generalize it across the public spectrum. she was, in a sense, living in her own little world and projecting it onto the rest of us.

lastly, people do this all the time, they only speak from their own inner circle of experience and don't ever think about what's really happening out there in the real world.

The OP is not wrong, he's just not entirely right.
 
D

deleted716371

Guest
I just think there are way more substantial dicks out there than the often quoted statistics say. First I think gay men are on average about 1 inch bigger than straight men. There have been some studies on this. So that would put well over half of all gay men are bigger than 6 inches. And a 6 inch thick dick can look pretty big both in person and on video. So if you think a dick bigger than 6 inches especially if thick is a substantial and sizable dick than well there you have it.

Please refer to a scientific study supporting the theory that gay men have on 1 inch longer cocks.
 

Dport

Admired Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2012
Posts
1,188
Media
0
Likes
996
Points
198
Location
Illinois (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Guys who are confident enough to put themselves in to amateur porn are probly the ones who are above average.

Go to NFL an game and see a bunch of 6'3 300lbs guys... Doesn't matter how big they are, rhe average guy is still 5'9 175 lbs.
 

fournineteenfiftynine

Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Posts
1,470
Media
10
Likes
1,758
Points
593
Location
Minneapolis (Minnesota, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
W-w-what?

Link me one study, and let's chat. One.

The relation between sexual orientation and penile size - PubMed
The relation between sexual orientation and penile dimensions in a large sample of men was studied. Subjects were 5122 men interviewed by the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction from 1938 to 1963. They were dichotomously classified as either homosexual (n = 935) or heterosexual (n = 4187). Penile dimensions were assessed using five measures of penile length and circumference from Kinsey's original protocol. On all five measures, homosexual men reported larger penises than did heterosexual men. Explanations for these differences are discussed, including the possibility that these findings provide additional evidence that variations in prenatal hormonal levels (or other biological mechanisms affecting reproductive structures) affect sexual orientation development.
 
7

7053701

Guest
So, you are basing your information on data that was collected 82 years ago.

82 years.

And they finished their study 57 years ago.

I hope you realize that any reputable study questions the validity of source material that is 10+ years old. And you are quoting something that was started almost a century ago. K, gotcha. Even if common sense didn't ring a bell with the idea that "homosexuals have larger penises", the sheer archaic nature of what you are basing it on should have discounted your assertion.

Also, did you read the article? Or just take the Abstract, with the Kinsey info, as truth? It goes into much more detail. Let me post some quotes from it.

"However, one criticism of these approaches (e.g.,
Byne and Parsons, 1993) is that there is little evidence that homosexual men and
women differ from heterosexual men and women in genital morphology.."

"A number of factors may account for why heterosexuals and the vast majority
of homosexuals do not seem to differ in genital morphology..
"

And, on the measuring itself:

"Penis length was estimated or measured along the top of the penis
from the belly to the tip. For penis circumference, the men were told to measure
at the point of maximum circumference. During the interviews, Kinsey and his
colleagues often slowly slid a  nger along a standard ruler with the numerals
not visible and t old the men to indicate when the length of their erect penis had
been reached. For the measured sizes, the men were given speci c instructions
on how to measure their penises, and precision of measurement was stressed.
These measured sizes were performed after the interview, and the participants
mailed their measurements to the Kinsey Institute using standard response cards
and preaddressed stamped envelopes"


So, they did the measurements on the honor system, not using a trained clinician who would take them in person. On that basis alone, the data is unreliable. That is why archaic sources like this are generally not used, as modern rigors of research are much more stringent, and the results are more widely peer reviewed.

Although the basis of that article hinges off the Kinsey study, the bulk of it is on hormonal discussions, and the potential affect on the developing fetus' and child's penis size up through puberty, while also acknowledging genetics and other environmental affects.

But, again, they are using the Kinsey data as their source, and building an argument around it. As I've noted, that data is unreliable. A modern study with a large population might show a trend, but with all the unmeasurable variables of past diet, hormones, environmental impact, etc.. that would be suspect as well.

Oh, did I forget to toss in the bias of the researcher? At the very end of the article:

"Second, it is clear that, despite the fact that gay men
may be more concerned than heterosexual men with some elements of their body,
such as the need for a thin physique (e.g., Siever, 1994), heterosexual men are in
fact concerned—even preoccupied—about the size of their penises and often de-
sire a larger one (e.g., Zilbergeld, 1978). Third, heterosexual men are often much
more conforming than homosexual men to stereotypically “masculine” gender
roles (e.g., Bailey and Zucker, 1995). Fourth, there is evidence tha t homosexual
men may be less likely than heterosexual men to falsify/exaggerate personality
and attitudinal information on questionnaires where social desirability is a n issue
(Freedman, 1975)"

Top to bottom, this is a highly flawed article, and certainly isn't a firm base for your assertion of (all) homosexual men having larger penises than heterosexual men.

Source: full article
 
D

deleted716371

Guest
The relation between sexual orientation and penile size - PubMed
The relation between sexual orientation and penile dimensions in a large sample of men was studied. Subjects were 5122 men interviewed by the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction from 1938 to 1963. They were dichotomously classified as either homosexual (n = 935) or heterosexual (n = 4187). Penile dimensions were assessed using five measures of penile length and circumference from Kinsey's original protocol. On all five measures, homosexual men reported larger penises than did heterosexual men. Explanations for these differences are discussed, including the possibility that these findings provide additional evidence that variations in prenatal hormonal levels (or other biological mechanisms affecting reproductive structures) affect sexual orientation development.

The finding in this study was that the average gay cock was 0.3'' longer. 6.3'' instead of 6. Pretty far from 1''. Please note also that this is based on self measured data. Along with a few other scientific weaknesses in the study.
 

fournineteenfiftynine

Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Posts
1,470
Media
10
Likes
1,758
Points
593
Location
Minneapolis (Minnesota, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
So, you are basing your information on data that was collected 82 years ago.

82 years.

And they finished their study 57 years ago.

I hope you realize that any reputable study questions the validity of source material that is 10+ years old. And you are quoting something that was started almost a century ago. K, gotcha. Even if common sense didn't ring a bell with the idea that "homosexuals have larger penises", the sheer archaic nature of what you are basing it on should have discounted your assertion.

Also, did you read the article? Or just take the Abstract, with the Kinsey info, as truth? It goes into much more detail. Let me post some quotes from it.

"However, one criticism of these approaches (e.g.,
Byne and Parsons, 1993) is that there is little evidence that homosexual men and
women differ from heterosexual men and women in genital morphology.."

"A number of factors may account for why heterosexuals and the vast majority
of homosexuals do not seem to differ in genital morphology..
"

And, on the measuring itself:

"Penis length was estimated or measured along the top of the penis
from the belly to the tip. For penis circumference, the men were told to measure
at the point of maximum circumference. During the interviews, Kinsey and his
colleagues often slowly slid a  nger along a standard ruler with the numerals
not visible and t old the men to indicate when the length of their erect penis had
been reached. For the measured sizes, the men were given speci c instructions
on how to measure their penises, and precision of measurement was stressed.
These measured sizes were performed after the interview, and the participants
mailed their measurements to the Kinsey Institute using standard response cards
and preaddressed stamped envelopes"


So, they did the measurements on the honor system, not using a trained clinician who would take them in person. On that basis alone, the data is unreliable. That is why archaic sources like this are generally not used, as modern rigors of research are much more stringent, and the results are more widely peer reviewed.

Although the basis of that article hinges off the Kinsey study, the bulk of it is on hormonal discussions, and the potential affect on the developing fetus' and child's penis size up through puberty, while also acknowledging genetics and other environmental affects.

But, again, they are using the Kinsey data as their source, and building an argument around it. As I've noted, that data is unreliable. A modern study with a large population might show a trend, but with all the unmeasurable variables of past diet, hormones, environmental impact, etc.. that would be suspect as well.

Oh, did I forget to toss in the bias of the researcher? At the very end of the article:

"Second, it is clear that, despite the fact that gay men
may be more concerned than heterosexual men with some elements of their body,
such as the need for a thin physique (e.g., Siever, 1994), heterosexual men are in
fact concerned—even preoccupied—about the size of their penises and often de-
sire a larger one (e.g., Zilbergeld, 1978). Third, heterosexual men are often much
more conforming than homosexual men to stereotypically “masculine” gender
roles (e.g., Bailey and Zucker, 1995). Fourth, there is evidence tha t homosexual
men may be less likely than heterosexual men to falsify/exaggerate personality
and attitudinal information on questionnaires where social desirability is a n issue
(Freedman, 1975)"

Top to bottom, this is a highly flawed article, and certainly isn't a firm base for your assertion of (all) homosexual men having larger penises than heterosexual men.

Source: full article
you asked for one study.
 

fournineteenfiftynine

Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Posts
1,470
Media
10
Likes
1,758
Points
593
Location
Minneapolis (Minnesota, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
My comments were not based on verified scientific data. This thread was not about scientific data. It was based on personal observations. This always happens. There are always people who want scientific proof of something that there really isn't much of. Scientific studies of penis sizes are quite sparse and all, like most scientific data sets, have flaws. But again, my original comment was not trying to communicate anything scientific other than there has been one study and some theories as to why gay penises might be somewhat bigger......I don't think any of you are scientists and neither am I. Just trying to have fun with my opinion on a fun topic which is why I'm here not to argue science.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AVx22

Godslittlejoke

Cherished Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2020
Posts
376
Media
0
Likes
333
Points
323
Location
Parkersburg (West Virginia, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I honestly thought the title was in reference to a lot of the personalities you run into on the internet. Lol. My bad.
However, I think the development of social media and increased web access around the world have simply widened the viewport. There really isn't an increase in the number of big dicks physically or metaphorically speaking. We are just able to see more of what was already there.
Thanks to the internet it really is a small world.
 

fournineteenfiftynine

Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Posts
1,470
Media
10
Likes
1,758
Points
593
Location
Minneapolis (Minnesota, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I think what your post reflects is a reasonable perspective. It's this seemingly contradiction. Even though penis size studies are still quite rare and there is little scientific proof about size, there has been more widely accepted understandings that the vast majority maybe even 90% of dicks out there are around 5-6 inches and that dicks bigger than 7 inches are quite rare. Then that is confounded by the observation that there seems to be an abundance of big dicks out there. There are lots of interesting explanations for this. Often the explanations are that those with bigger dicks are viewed more on the Internet so they show up more in search engines. Then there is personal experience. I've had about 50 naked male lovers since I came out about 10 years ago and I would say that I only experienced maybe 5/50 that were smaller than my 5.5. inches. And I would say at least half were over 6.5 inches and maybe 20/50 were 7.5 or over and at least 10 were 8 inches or more. When I've gone to naked pool parties I've seen plenty of big dicks.

I like to look at Adam 4 Adam sometimes and do searches by dick size. The top of the bell curve is in the 7-8 inch range. There are significantly more dicks in the 8 inch range than in the 5 inch range. It's quite easy to do the search if you are a member. I know people criticize that people are self reporting and likely over estimating. Yet when you look at the pictures - they look pretty big and substantial.

Anyway, I just think that large penises can be both statistically rare and yet also plentiful and easy to find or get access to.

In my city assuming their are 1.5 million men. And 10% might be over 7 inches that means there might be 150,000 men with big penises over 7 inches and maybe like 15,000 men with dicks @ 9 inches which are not exactly a needle in a haystack.

THIS IS OPINION. I AM NOT A SCIENTIST NOR MAKING ANY SCIENTIFIC DECLARATIONS. JUST AN OPINION. THANK YOU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VIIby5

startrek1

Cherished Member
Account Deletion Pending
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Posts
143
Media
0
Likes
289
Points
218
Location
UK
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
It is a real problem, porn has distorted some people's perceptions they don't realise that an 8" cock is bigger than around 90% of guys. It dulls the wow when a big dick is actually seen.
 

Juiceypeen

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2020
Posts
150
Media
0
Likes
201
Points
53
Location
New York (United States)
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Same reason most male hollywood stars are either jacked or become so. The average male body is not jonathan majors from lovecraft country. And most if not all of our entertainment works off the idea of rarity. The more rare something is or seems to be the more we'll watch. To get a different feeling. So the people on screen seem more special than others.

Businesses can sell more that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted1074483