alex8.5
Admired Member
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2007
- Posts
- 1,672
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 830
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Bel Air, California. USA
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Excellent questions for those who were apoplectic over the quality of the performances. What specifically did they do to "butcher" the songs? IMO, off key, "pitchiness", or even a modified arrangement that falls flat doesn't constitute ignorance of the material nor a lack of homage paid to The Beatles' influence.When the phrase "butcher the Beatles" is used, does that mean "doesn't perform it exactly as the Beatles did"? If that's what it means, well, that's the whole point of doing a cover - a different interpretation. If each performer made their performance stylistically identical to the original, what's the point? Might as well just listen to a recording of the original.
I sure hope not!Are they doing Beatles again tonight???!
Are they doing Beatles again tonight???!
It's amusing to see some of these responses.
When the phrase "butcher the Beatles" is used, does that mean "doesn't perform it exactly as the Beatles did"? If that's what it means, well, that's the whole point of doing a cover - a different interpretation. If each performer made their performance stylistically identical to the original, what's the point? Might as well just listen to a recording of the original.
...doesn't constitute ignorance of the material nor a lack of homage paid to The Beatles'...
Of course, forgetting the lyrics is unforgivable. It displays an abject lack of professionalism.Personally, I was referring to the Idols' forgetting the lyrics, singing poorly, and taking "creative license" with the songs, only to mess them up.
I figure that's true for most everyone. I think we set in our minds how a song should generally sound and we'll allow some variation but not a lot. Some covers are truly better, though.Very few covers have ever done the originals justice, in my opinion. ...
It could be worse.....doing Michael Jackson. Songs I mean. But on second thought doing him would be awful!
I figure that's true for most everyone. I think we set in our minds how a song should generally sound and we'll allow some variation but not a lot. Some covers are truly better, though.
Here's a different experience: I like Billy Idol's cover of "To Be a Lover". The original was done in the 1950s and it was slower and softer. In the late 90s [maybe later] I heard the original for the first time: didn't like it! Simply didn't like it! I guess I have Billy Idol's version set in my mind.
^^He didn't give propper credit for those.
Chris Cornell originally did that version of Billie Jean
and
Incubus did the version of Hello.
He's totally able to pull them off but is a bit of a douche for not citing his references.
^^He didn't give propper credit for those.
Chris Cornell originally did that version of Billie Jean
and
Incubus did the version of Hello.
He's totally able to pull them off but is a bit of a douche for not citing his references.
^^He didn't give propper credit for those.
Chris Cornell originally did that version of Billie Jean
and
Incubus did the version of Hello.
He's totally able to pull them off but is a bit of a douche for not citing his references.
Correct. None of the performances David Cook has "made his own" so far have been "his own" (his Eleanor Rigby was copied from Doxology). I would be impressed with him if proved he could come up with an strikingly original arrangement of a song that both suits his style and re-imagines the material, rather than wisely identifying someone else's inspired idea.
It makes me smirk every time one of the judges (all 3 of them have done this at one time or another) gives him accolades for originality and risk-taking.
Say what you will about Blake Lewis, but the thing that impressed me from the get-go was his truly gifted talent for transforming a song into something unique and distinctly Blakian. It didn't always work of course, but more times than not it did, and even when it didn't I still gave him credit for trying.
That's not true. When Ryan introduced him he said David would be singing Chris Cornell's version of Billie Jean.
Particularly, what the hell was Paula on? I usually don't notice her randomness, but last night was too blatant to not realize.
Kevbo - I'm with you. I'm sad that Chikezie is gone. He wasn't the best last night, but he's certainly better than Jason Castro (and his attitude).
I loved David Cook's version of "Billie Jean". I hadn't heard that he's been taking heat from adopting other band's versions of songs. That being said, I thought his interpretation was better than the original for sure!
Cheers - Sugar