Hello!.
I have been observing this page Web among others and of equal way I have observed the men who I have been able to see naked and I have reached the conclusion that those men who are Well-endowed-men generally are men of skinny or thin contexture, that is to say, they are not fat men.
And another very peculiar subject is that there is much Well-endowed-men that is 'lampiños'-men, that is to say, men who have very little hair in the body, and also have little sexual hair.
On the other hand, I have given account that those men, when they are adolescent, and they begin physically to be developed (the puberty) those boys who are developed to very early age DO NOT MANAGE TO DEVELOP VERY LONG PENISES (flaccid and erect) but, those boys that begin delayed to be developed or to very outpost age of the puberty, they yes manage to develop penises that are much more long in soft-state and hard-state.
This one is my hypothesis:
1. - That those men who are 'lampiños' (of very little hair in the body and very little sexual hair) tend to be men of much more long penises that those that is fat and very hairly men corporally.
2. - That if a boy begins to be developed to very early age he is going to have a small penis, but those boys who are developed to delayed age will have longer penises.
What you think of whom I have commented?
In many of the photographies that you have placed here, it is possible to be seen that the very long men who have flaccid-penis they are skinny men and of very little coporal and sexual hair. However, the men who are fat and who have much hair in the body and sex tend to have sizes of much smaller penises.
Bye!.
NOTE: 'Lampiño' = man that has very little hair in his body and his sex too.
I have been observing this page Web among others and of equal way I have observed the men who I have been able to see naked and I have reached the conclusion that those men who are Well-endowed-men generally are men of skinny or thin contexture, that is to say, they are not fat men.
And another very peculiar subject is that there is much Well-endowed-men that is 'lampiños'-men, that is to say, men who have very little hair in the body, and also have little sexual hair.
On the other hand, I have given account that those men, when they are adolescent, and they begin physically to be developed (the puberty) those boys who are developed to very early age DO NOT MANAGE TO DEVELOP VERY LONG PENISES (flaccid and erect) but, those boys that begin delayed to be developed or to very outpost age of the puberty, they yes manage to develop penises that are much more long in soft-state and hard-state.
This one is my hypothesis:
1. - That those men who are 'lampiños' (of very little hair in the body and very little sexual hair) tend to be men of much more long penises that those that is fat and very hairly men corporally.
2. - That if a boy begins to be developed to very early age he is going to have a small penis, but those boys who are developed to delayed age will have longer penises.
What you think of whom I have commented?
In many of the photographies that you have placed here, it is possible to be seen that the very long men who have flaccid-penis they are skinny men and of very little coporal and sexual hair. However, the men who are fat and who have much hair in the body and sex tend to have sizes of much smaller penises.
Bye!.
NOTE: 'Lampiño' = man that has very little hair in his body and his sex too.