B_Nick4444
Expert Member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2007
- Posts
- 6,849
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 106
- Points
- 193
- Location
- San Antonio, TX
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I know I know facts have a liberal bias.
say huh?
This from a person who starts a thread titled 'Third World Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama'. You really aren't concerned at all with facts and reason. To post something like this suggests you have a problem with making an argument on the basis of facts without resulting to fear, intolerance and oh so subtle race baiting.
not at all, dear fellow
the glaring specifics of the Obama Administration all strike me as third world
everything from the aesthetics and modality of the portion of the electorate that elected him, his background, his sensibilities, his policies, and the end result of driving the American republic closer to third world status
much as the glaring specifics of the Bush Administration compel the designation of The Petroleum Presidency
but, back to the original question -- can you submit an economic argument of your own construction?
(the reason I ask, is that the posts you have made seem to suggest otherwise)