The "empowered" woman according to lpsg

D

deleted924715

Guest
False accusations of rape are no greater than false accusations of every other crime. Would you not take a ride home from a co-worker because you feared being accused of hijacking? Or not borrow a book from a friend because you feared being accused of stealing it?

If you are not trolling by using college as an example (you couldn't have picked a worse one) watch The Hunting Game and gain some perspective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 950483
9

950483

Guest
I don't know what actually happened here, but this guy will never have a normal life again since his name is forever on the internet as an accused rapist.

http://m.startribune.com/st-john-s-...n-in-her-dorm-sues-over-suspension/398784011/

At first, Wildenborg was “not seeking sexual activity” due to a medical condition making it painful, but the two began kissing and then he asked her: “Do you consent to this?” the suit reads.

Wildenborg was advised during freshmen orientation about the importance of obtaining consent in sexual encounters, according to the suit, and he also knew of a friend who did not seek affirmative consent and “suffered the consequences.”

“Given his friend’s experience, [Wildenborg] had resolved to … obtain affirmative consent for sexual activity, no matter how awkward it was,” the suit says, and she verbally agreed.

The next evening, the suit continues, the woman texted Wildenborg to say that she was intoxicated and unsure whether they had had intercourse. He said they had not.

More than five months after the encounter, which ended with the pair “cuddling naked” during the night, the suit said, the woman filed a formal complaint with school officials saying that Wildenborg had engaged in sexual misconduct, according to the lawsuit. She said in the statement that he tried to penetrate her without her consent.
Well this man is having a fantastic time, and enjoying his life.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-37786609
 

firsttimecaller

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Posts
588
Media
0
Likes
217
Points
78
False accusations of rape are no greater than false accusations of every other crime.

Thats...an odd thing to say. I think the only thing worse to be falsely accused of would be murder.


If you are not trolling

Im just brainstorming to flesh out an argument. I dont think this is going anywhere at this point.

I would say, the female is like athletes with PEDs...you are ultimately responsible for anything you put in your body.

You would counter with, the male is like gun safety...dont point it at anything you dont intend to shoot.

And theyre both right I guess.

So, yeah.

UBFoMSu.jpg
 

xnxxxv

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Posts
166
Media
14
Likes
127
Points
78
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
False accusations of rape are no greater than false accusations of every other crime. Would you not take a ride home from a co-worker because you feared being accused of hijacking? Or not borrow a book from a friend because you feared being accused of stealing it?

If you are not trolling by using college as an example (you couldn't have picked a worse one) watch The Hunting Game and gain some perspective.

Except in every other crime you're innocent until proven guilty not the other way around, if you're falsely accused of theft it's not going to follow you around for the remainder of your life is it?

Anonymity should be offered both ways to protect the integrity of the investigation because trying someone by public opinion is a insult to both the victim and the defendant and the entire judicial system.

Speaking from personal experience One of my friends was accused of rape, he lost his job since what he did embarrassed his employer since it happened at a work event.

He was subject to threats of abuse and violence from outraged parties, investigated taken to court by the CPS but then the case was dropped because evidence emerged where the woman admitted she had not been honest.

If he'd been offered anonymity he might have been able to salvage some of his life.

Still it's a good thing he wasn't an arsehole I mean he decided not to pursue her for loss of earnings he only took his employer to the cleaner.
 
Last edited:
D

deleted924715

Guest
Thats...an odd thing to say. I think the only thing worse to be falsely accused of would be murder.




Im just brainstorming to flesh out an argument. I dont think this is going anywhere at this point.

I would say, the female is like athletes with PEDs...you are ultimately responsible for anything you put in your body.

You would counter with, the male is like gun safety...dont point it at anything you dont intend to shoot.

And theyre both right I guess.

So, yeah.

UBFoMSu.jpg

Not greater in number
 
D

deleted924715

Guest
Except in every other crime you're innocent until proven guilty not the other way around, if you're falsely accused of theft it's not going to follow you around for the remainder of your life is it?

Anonymity should be offered both ways to protect the integrity of the investigation because trying someone by public opinion is a insult to both the victim and the defendant and the entire judicial system.

Speaking from personal experience One of my friends was accused of rape, he lost his job since what he did embarrassed his employer since it happened at a work event.

He was subject to threats of abuse and violence from outraged parties, investigated taken to court by the CPS but then the case was dropped because evidence emerged where the woman admitted she had not been honest.

If he'd been offered anonymity he might have been able to salvage some of his life.

Still it's a good thing he wasn't an arsehole I mean he decided not to pursue her for loss of earnings he only took his employer to the cleaner.

This is a whole different discussion - you'll need to read back through the thread to see why.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 950483 and 693987

xnxxxv

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Posts
166
Media
14
Likes
127
Points
78
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
This is a whole different discussion - you'll need to read back through the thread to see why.
I thought it was fairly relevant you made the assumption that accusing someone of rape is no different than accusing them of any other crime except it's not since the effects of the accusation can be long lasting like accusing someone of being a pedophile, it can result in vigilante justice you're not going to be attacked if someone accuses you of speeding or not paying your taxes are you?
 
D

deleted924715

Guest
I thought it was fairly relevant you made the assumption that accusing someone of rape is no different than accusing them of any other crime except it's not since the effects of the accusation can be long lasting like accusing someone of being a pedophile, it can result in vigilante justice you're not going to be attacked if someone accuses you of speeding or not paying your taxes are you?

No the comparison was to the number of instances - there was an inference that false rape accusations were rampant
 
  • Like
Reactions: 950483

jujube

Cherished Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Posts
676
Media
0
Likes
272
Points
283
Still it's a good thing he wasn't an arsehole I mean he decided not to pursue her for loss of earnings he only took his employer to the cleaner.
Where is the moral logic in that?

If the woman is responsible for wreaking such havoc by fabricating a tale of rape, then she should be held responsible to the full extent allowed by law. Being lax in punishing women just because they are women is not morally justified in my opinion.
 

jujube

Cherished Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Posts
676
Media
0
Likes
272
Points
283
For every story I've heard about false rape accusations I know 20 women right now who have been raped and their rapist was never held accountable.
Have those women reported those crimes to the authorities and cooperated with the police investigation and legal prosecution of the perpetrator(s)? I am sure that they would receive the most sincere support of their families and friends.

Letting some woman get away unscathed after making false accusations that have tarnished a company's reputation and destroyed an innocent person's livelihood does not in any way make up for the injustice dealt to those women whose assailants have not been held accountable for their crimes.
 

xnxxxv

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Posts
166
Media
14
Likes
127
Points
78
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
No the comparison was to the number of instances - there was an inference that false rape accusations were rampant
But that's not how your post came across though. regardless of how prevalent it is there is a difference in the levels of crimes is why we don't sentence criminals to the same prison sentences so from the beginning what you said was flawed.
 
D

deleted924715

Guest
But that's not how your post came across though. regardless of how prevalent it is there is a difference in the levels of crimes is why we don't sentence criminals to the same prison sentences so from the beginning what you said was flawed.

Fair enough. Or you jumping in without the context of the whole thread was flawed. Just sayin'. Only an idiot would think all crimes are of the same severity... and I may be many things, but I am not an idiot. Neither am I ignorant of the legal system.

To be fair though, I can see reading it back that it isn't how it came across to you and it would have been clearer had I typed out 'greater in number', but this was the post that prompted mine and was part of an ongoing discussion:

I think this is the best way to make my original point...

Every day that goes by, there is more sympathy and awareness for the female, and vengeance towards the male, regarding male on female rape. And rightfully so.

As such, its more and more imperative for the male to be damn fucking sure he has consent from the female before commencing anything. Because once that accusation comes out, he's gonna be in a world of shit regardless of its legitimacy.

It therefore seems that, fair or not, the woman is increasingly being given the responsibility of the final go-ahead.

You are trying to take to take the discussion in a different direction entirely because you have a personal axe to grind. Not saying it isn't worthy of discussion, but it wasn't what was being discussed - it was about personal responsibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xnxxxv

xnxxxv

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Posts
166
Media
14
Likes
127
Points
78
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Have those women reported those crimes to the authorities and cooperated with the police investigation and legal prosecution of the perpetrator(s)? I am sure that they would receive the most sincere support of their families and friends.

Letting some woman get away unscathed after making false accusations that have tarnished a company's reputation and destroyed an innocent person's livelihood does not in any way make up for the injustice dealt to those women whose assailants have not been held accountable for their crimes.

Had the autorities been better at dealing with them then people wouldn't be saying the way in which they approach these cases should be reformed would they?
If judges were capable of not giving out stupid punishments like the stanford rapist then women might not have such a problem with reporting and co operating but when you live in a world where there's a strong chance your abuser will get a light sentence and possibly come after you would you take that risk? Or the risk where you'll have a scumbag in a suit assassinate your character in open court?

Because a women being promiscuous affects her credibility but a bloke being a sex obsessed degenerate isn't more likely to do it to satisfy his urges?

False rape claims are a molehill compared to rapes that go unreported and unpunished.

Did I say that? also you're passing judgement without know the full facts kind of like what happens when rape cases a tried in the court of public opinion which I Imagine you dislike no?
Fair enough. Or you jumping in without the context of the whole thread was flawed. Just sayin'. Only an idiot would think all crimes are of the same severity... and I may be many things, but I am not an idiot. Neither am I ignorant of the legal system.

To be fair though, I can see reading it back that it isn't how it came across to you and it would have been clearer had I typed out 'greater in number', but this was the post that prompted mine and was part of an ongoing discussion:

.
calls me stupid then proceeds to throw out a thinly veiled ad hoc argument to attempt to save face for her comment which alluded to none of the points you mentioned and the post before your post was a story about a man who's life had been ruined following a false claim. You then proceed to go on about how is it any different from being accused of another crime so I'm confused as to why you'd think my post wasn't relevant? Could you explain it for this stupid man I'd be ever so greatful.
 
D

deleted924715

Guest
calls me stupid then proceeds to throw out a thinly veiled ad hoc argument to attempt to save face for her comment which alluded to none of the points you mentioned and the post before your post was a story about a man who's life had been ruined following a false claim. You then proceed to go on about how is it any different from being accused of another crime so I'm confused as to why you'd think my post wasn't relevant? Could you explain it for this stupid man I'd be ever so greatful.

What?
a) I didn't call you stupid... Please show where I did
b) I didn't ask how it was different from being accused of any other crime. Please show where I did
c) I was having an ongoing discussion with first time caller about responsibility for actions - my posts (and his) are there for all to see. The documentary I referenced quotes the false rape accusation stats in comparison to false accusations for other crimes...
d) Stop trying to 'save face' and read the whole thread yourself, don't expect me to regurgitate it for you because you're a Johnny-come lately to the conversation who has read the last couple of posts and jumped in feet first. Your observations about rape laws are irrelevant - I'm not saying they are wrong, I'm saying they are irrelevant to the conversation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 950483
9

950483

Guest
Had the autorities been better at dealing with them then people wouldn't be saying the way in which they approach these cases should be reformed would they?
If judges were capable of not giving out stupid punishments like the stanford rapist then women might not have such a problem with reporting and co operating but when you live in a world where there's a strong chance your abuser will get a light sentence and possibly come after you would you take that risk? Or the risk where you'll have a scumbag in a suit assassinate your character in open court?

Because a women being promiscuous affects her credibility but a bloke being a sex obsessed degenerate isn't more likely to do it to satisfy his urges?

False rape claims are a molehill compared to rapes that go unreported and unpunished.

Did I say that? also you're passing judgement without know the full facts kind of like what happens when rape cases a tried in the court of public opinion which I Imagine you dislike no?

calls me stupid then proceeds to throw out a thinly veiled ad hoc argument to attempt to save face for her comment which alluded to none of the points you mentioned and the post before your post was a story about a man who's life had been ruined following a false claim. You then proceed to go on about how is it any different from being accused of another crime so I'm confused as to why you'd think my post wasn't relevant? Could you explain it for this stupid man I'd be ever so greatful.
'Fake rape' woman Layla Ibrahim fights to clear name

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37974905

If you would really like to discuss this subject, I think you should start your own thread.
 

dreom

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Posts
2
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
13
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
mgtow and mra guys make some valid points but their methodology is stupid, and also against them. Because of the ambiguity of the language being used, they do not understand that, freedom and power will come with responsibilities and accountability. They are so bitter about the current situation since they were raised with traditional ideas, so they are not well-equipped for the alteration of the society. I dont even know where to start... I will try to cut it short.

Those guys, and maybe also you OP, need to stop idealizing the female gender. What we call woman is just human female. And femininity is not being 'gay-ish' or 'girly', it is something else. Traditionally;

human female + femininity = woman
human male + masculinity = man

Femininity : Submissive, denies responsibility and accountablity, doesnt need to take care of themselves financially and also doesnt need to take care of others as financially, needed to be protected and has no obligation to protect, something that can be captured, allowed to be emotional, allowed to fail or not be succesful and also most of times prohibited to achieve success, allowed to be beautiful and praised by their body, center object of sexual desire, joint of social interactions... etc.

Masculinity : Dominant, responsible and accountable both for themselves and others, has to take care of themselves financially and others, noone need to protect them but they must protect others and themselves, someone that captures, not allowed to be emotional, not allowed to fail and allowed and must be successful, can not be beautiful, must crave for sexual object all the time, provider for social interactions... etc.

You need to understand that femininity (submission) is not slavery at all or masculinity (domination) is not complete possesion. If you are feminine, it means you deny your responsbility and accountability, if you are masculine, it means those denied responsibilities will be your burden and you will be held accountable for them. This can also be seen as the dominant (masculine) is a slave, and submissive (feminine) is its' owner.

'women's liberation', 'empowered women' are not exactly what you think. Women are allowed to become more masculine, which will be followed by forcing them to become more masculine as well as forcing males to become more feminine. Also, this will break the female monopoly over the femininity. It never was only ''men opresses women'', you know, it was also and mostly females didnt want to let males to have more feminine character and want to keep their monopoly over it.

Traditionalists idealize female gender as heroin, a desire object, so males have to compete each other, and be able to protect and provide for them in order to get one of them, so society will know they are successful, if not, you are a human no more. This is slavery in the mind. This keeps females achieving and explore the life, burden them with the 'so-called holy' mother figure only and also keeps males stressed, and burdened with females' denied agency/responsibilities.

Today's feminist movement also doing the same thing because of traditionalists. The actual danger is women's liberation+traditionalist ideas, which will be a complete slavery for males. This means females are liberated but also still keeping their monopoly over femininity, and still denying their agency and responsibilities.

So... what needs to be done is to leave traditionalist ideas, they dont mix well with women's liberation.

If females are leaving prostitution and getting sluttier, then males need to stop being sluts and lean a bit into prostitution. Yeah, males are sluts not females. Slut : promiscuous and always ready, Prostitute : Having standards and expect some type of payment.

Have some standars and principles, i have high standars when it comes to females. I'm not going have sex with any females i encounter, i'm not desperate. Oh and equal means equal. I dont value females more than i value males, but most males are so stupid they dont even value themselves, because most of them are mentally slaves to so-called divine femininity. I'm all for not paying for females and i dont, and i dont see it as an obligation. I dont feel any obligation to protect females as well. We are not living in some post-catastrophic times so protecting females is an absurd idea. All females must work and earn their life, they can not depend on anyone. If males are dying in wars, then females must die as well... etc etc list goes on. ınstead of crying, just change your way of thinking.

Stop idealizing females, speak to them as human beings like you are, rather than a divine object that will illuminate your life, because they are not and actually they far from it. You dont have to ''man up'', stop being tooooo much ''man''. Stop it, let it go. Relieve yourself from your burdens.

Hope my english level was enough to express my thoughts.