Given the high profile of a few murder cases where the accused uses the "gay panic" defense, and also the fact that there are so many low-profile cases that are similar, it got me thinking. For those of you who may be unfamiliar with this, it is when a supposedly straight guy panics when another guy makes moves on him, and in his panic, he kills the filthy little queer. Many of these cases end up with acquittal, or with greatly reduced or suspended sentences, as the judge and jury can sympathize with the poor, traumatized murderer. I mean, think about it, some homosexual actually asked to suck his cock (he probably let the guy suck it, then offed him). Anyways, in light of the trend of the courts to be lenient with the "gay panic" defense, should women also get in on the action? If a woman has some hideous guy hittin' on her when she is out at a bar with the girls, should she be able to kill him, then claim the "troglodyte panic" defense to get a suspended sentence? After all, women also are entitled to equal legal protection, under the 14th Amendment. Fair is fair, right?