NineInchCock_160IQ said:
Because you eat a banana and that makes your cramp go away it does seem reasonable to suspect that the banana might be high in potassium. It doesn't seem to imply that the banana was involved in some insidious conspiracy with Zionist elders to use their secret KGB-built orbital cramp-control lasers to trigger that cramp in your leg, though.
Said another way, there may well have been ulterior motives for the war in Iraq. In fact it's highly PROBABLE that there were ulterior motives for the war in Iraq. There's plenty of other evidence that there were ulterior motives for the war in Iraq. But it's still highly IMprobable that this administration was behind any part of planning or executing 9/11 and almost as improbable that there was any large-scale conspiracy to be complacent during it or complicit in it. One does NOT equal the other.
No, not necessarily of course, but when a specific group of people with an incredible amount of power worldwide have been PROVEN to have lied time and again about their individual behaviors wrt said event, it DOES lead to an obvious conclusion of either group stupidity or at least the underpinings of bad intention. At the very least they used the momentum of the tragedy of 9/11 to gain enough support to invade Iraq with no provocation.
I've been a conspiracy theorist since the damned thing started, and I mean 9/11. It has been PURELY speculative on my part, admittedly, and I also admit that it began with my dislike and distrust of 'ol Dumbya. Maybe I just put too much faith in our abilities to track things like planes that go off course, I have never been able to understand why there was no one monitoring those planes that would have known they'd gone off course to begin with. At the very least, I'd have thought there would have been cause to be on the lookout on 9/11, since we now know that (contrary to the original claims of bush and everyone else involved that they had no prior knowledge that a threat had been made) they WERE aware that Bin Laden had made a specific threat for that specific day that he would do exactly what he did do. See, I remembered the 80s and I already knew that the Bin Ladens and bushes were close family friends. As the lies of the cover-up of stupidity came to light (as I believed they would), my resolve became stronger.
Sure, there's a difference between inductive and deductive reasoning, and I realise that for most people, no amount of "nigga please" reasoning is going to satisfy their minds. But for me, it's just too far fetched to believe that an agency who has the vast amount of resources that our government has to be taken completely at unawares by a tribe of bandits in the desert. THAT'S a stretch I just can't make.
And why all the cover up? Why is so much of the factual evidence still classified if there's nothing to hide? Nigga please, it's too ridiculous to believe that it's just because it's "in the best interest of the American people" not to know. I don't HAVE evidence to back up my discomfort because the ones who are in charge of it won't let the truth out. THAT much is not up for debate, and it does lend credibility to the idea that something is rotten in Denmark. How much is uncertain, but given the scale of incompetencies that have unraveled since, it begs the question.
