- Joined
- Dec 21, 2021
- Posts
- 163
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 289
- Points
- 83
- Location
- Houston, Texas,United States
- Sexuality
- 90% Straight, 10% Gay
- Gender
- Male
I’ve become much less judgmental and I’ve tried to open my eyes to different perspectives as I’ve emotionally matured. I’ve started to question myself and question my assumptions as it pertains to relationships and I’m interested in your perspective.
For the longest I held that the greatest share of attraction between men and women was conjoined physical and emotional cocktail. I get there is always the exception to the rule but by and large, that’s the norm.
Any time I saw a couple with a great difference in age, attractiveness, or other characteristic, I attributed it to security, profit, or maybe call it nesting. I’m sorry but by and large I thought it wrong. (No, I’m not proud of it.)
Thing is, I never considered it as something that one could actually see as attractive. It was just something they possessed and the other wanted. Is it?? I never considered it or business prowess or wealth as a quality. Can it be? Is financial power any different than brute strength and physique?
I can work though the idea that one is attracted to another because the are an exceptional artist or perhaps an amazing chef, or has another “ability” but when it’s money or power society see it as dirty or sleazy. Why?
If you are attracted to someone with one of the other abilities doesn’t that attractee benefit from what it brings to the relationship?
I can see where a powerful and successful person could be attractive in a different but equally intense way. The thing is, if you are powerful in that sense then it’s likely you have done well for yourself. So why does the person that is drawn to it get regarded as a gold digger?
No, I am by no means well off and I have no interest in fishing. I’m just a guy getting comfortable with life and who I am and I like the way this group thinks and speaks their mind.
Getting older allows me to see Whitman was right, “ Be curious, not judgmental”.
Sorry if there are errors, I hate typing on this phone.
For the longest I held that the greatest share of attraction between men and women was conjoined physical and emotional cocktail. I get there is always the exception to the rule but by and large, that’s the norm.
Any time I saw a couple with a great difference in age, attractiveness, or other characteristic, I attributed it to security, profit, or maybe call it nesting. I’m sorry but by and large I thought it wrong. (No, I’m not proud of it.)
Thing is, I never considered it as something that one could actually see as attractive. It was just something they possessed and the other wanted. Is it?? I never considered it or business prowess or wealth as a quality. Can it be? Is financial power any different than brute strength and physique?
I can work though the idea that one is attracted to another because the are an exceptional artist or perhaps an amazing chef, or has another “ability” but when it’s money or power society see it as dirty or sleazy. Why?
If you are attracted to someone with one of the other abilities doesn’t that attractee benefit from what it brings to the relationship?
I can see where a powerful and successful person could be attractive in a different but equally intense way. The thing is, if you are powerful in that sense then it’s likely you have done well for yourself. So why does the person that is drawn to it get regarded as a gold digger?
No, I am by no means well off and I have no interest in fishing. I’m just a guy getting comfortable with life and who I am and I like the way this group thinks and speaks their mind.
Getting older allows me to see Whitman was right, “ Be curious, not judgmental”.
Sorry if there are errors, I hate typing on this phone.