9
918177
Guest
It can hold one hand out for bung hole pics and the other out for shit and see which one fills up first.
What the actual fuck?!
The Butthole Pic Challenge. Excuse me for bowing out. Maybe bowing out is the wrong term term. Backing away? Nope. That’s not it either. Um, just not taking a pic of me bum hole.
Bowing out... Missing a couple letters there.
Browning out.
I'll see myself out...![]()
Isn’t that one helluva a read? I guess castration would give a guy the ultimate in small dicks though.Castration of male sex offenders
I had forgotten about this little gem of a thread. And was just fine forgetting.
Except the OP bumped it today. So, being the good LPSGer that I am, I reread the entire thread. Yikes. I had forgotten the thread ran the gamut from the OP asking how should a male sexual predator be punished to admitting he was toying with the ladies, and then, ta da, the real crux of the thread: admitting he gets off on SPH. WTF?
My takeaway from the reread: You ladies sure do have to put up with a lot of shit here. And some folks wonder why y'all have no patience for the stupid...
Castration of male sex offenders
I had forgotten about this little gem of a thread. And was just fine forgetting.
Except the OP bumped it today. So, being the good LPSGer that I am, I reread the entire thread. Yikes. I had forgotten the thread ran the gamut from the OP asking how should a male sexual predator be punished to admitting he was toying with the ladies, and then, ta da, the real crux of the thread: admitting he gets off on SPH. WTF?
My takeaway from the reread: You ladies sure do have to put up with a lot of shit here. And some folks wonder why y'all have no patience for the stupid...
Can IGold Star gay here.I'm not one for labels as a rule, but, IMO, there are times when labels are necessary. For whatever reason.
Most of my current male friends are 100% straight. Several of them I find attractive. Appreciate their personalities. Their physiques. Their friendship. But...Don't wanna bonk them. They don't wanna bonk me. They don't bonk guys. Period. They just don't. That doesn't mean they can't appreciate a good looking guy or that a guy has a nice physique. Whatever. But it's not spoken about with any sexual connotation. At all. Doesn't mean they want to fool around/sleep with a guy. It's just observational.
I love women. My friggin' two besties are women. But I ain't feeling anything the least bit sexual about them. I can appreciate an attractive woman. A smart woman. A woman with a great physique. Whatever. Doesn't mean I want to sleep with them. Nope.
A couple guys I know identify as "straight". Both married. They play around with guys. IMO, they are not straight. They are perhaps "mostly straight" or "normally straight" or "usually straight". Or GASP--bi-sexual. But no, they are not straight. Period.
So maybe it's time for us to put our collective heads together (no pun intended) and come up with some new definitions for men.I'll start:
Straight: No male sexual contact. Ever.
Mostly straight: Maybe a little fooling around with a guy once upon a time, but nothing in years and no desire to. Kinda like I was curious, but now I know and it's not for me.
Mainly straight: Maybe a little fooling around now and then, but more situational than planned.
Semi-straight: Planned fooling around.
Straight in name only: Self-explanatory.
Gay: No female sexual contact. Ever.
Mostly gay: Maybe a little fooling around with a woman once upon a time, but nothing in years and no desire to. Kinda like I was curious, but now I know and it's not for me.
Mainly gay: Maybe a little fooling around now and then, but more situational than planned.
Semi-gay: Planned fooling around.
Gay in name only: Self-explanatory.
Now that I've typed this out, it seems silly to me. Cuz it's just one person's opinion about labels. Yours may/will vary. And that's okay.
I would seriously like to hear other perspectives. Some good ole honest discussion. Without rancor. Or name calling. Just because I may not agree with your opinion doesn't mean I don't want to hear it. As long as it's constructive. An opportunity for me to learn, if you will.
And we've yet to discuss Lesbians turning straight women gay...I for one would find such a discussion fascinating and another opportunity to learn something I'm probably ignorant of and don't know it.
But, IMO, we need to respect those men who say they are 100% Straight. Because they exist. Contrary to anyone's fantasy or hope. They really do. I know several. So do you.
Thanks so much for theCan Ithis quote.
Your explanation of how you feel about friends and relations is spot on. I 100% agree with it. I have men (and women) friends that I find gorgeous, even some I find that have that sexual energy about them. But I don't want to have sex with them. Not at all. My husband expresses your sentiments as well. Could we all live in this world you've defined??
That the first impression anyone would get is that you are talking about America speaks for itself.No, I don't mean America. I borrowed the title for this thread from an Enid Blyton story.
Often the funniest bits of LPSG aren't intentionally funny.
When you spot them, post them here, like a "best bits" compilation of absurdity.
OK but why is that a problem? Most accept that the term gay includes men who've had heterosexual experiences/desires, almost every gay man I know has had some heterosexual experience. So why does the straight male category require special protection, greater purity?
You reminded me of how nice it is to have that person on ignore..
Isn't this a bannable offense??