Send me your money - I'll manage it for you.
Don't you know that Wiki is the MOST UNRELIABLE source of information? (Next to FOX)
Colleges won't allow you to use it as a source because of its erroneous information. The AMA would laugh at using it as a credible source.
huh, it appears you didn't even read wikipedia.
It was just a simple definition of what a unipotent stem cell is.
Also, the attack against wikipedia is ill informed. I have personally contributed to dozens of articles and the peer review of the information is pretty rigorous. Basically, wikipedia is like any other encyclopedia, it reprints information that is available from reliable sources (such as the all mighty JAMA - which also has its flaws - I can find you many many contradictions in between articles posted there.)
The purpose of wikipedia is to lead people to the real source information.
As for colleges not allowing it for source material, perhaps you don't remember doing reports in elementary school, where citing an encyclopedia simply wasn't enough. It's not the veracity of information in wikipedia that causes trouble for colleges, it's because your brain isn't really doing any work to reprint it.
An encyclopedia is used as an index to source information. It is never indended to be the source.
Real research never stops at an encyclopedia of any kind. That would be like quoting Reader's Digest.