the longer the dick the longer the shot

[B_Just Joe]

I don't think there is any correlation but I'd imagine that applying physics to it would mean that the longer your cock was the more of a dampening effect it would have on the splooge distance attained. I don't really know how to explain it better as I don't have the language in physics to explain it.

youre totally right. if anything the longer penis' would shoot less the distance of a smaller cock. but on the same token a smaller cock should be shooting like a shotgun spread. lol

i think it all depends on the person. im very long but i can shoot long too. so it all depends

 

[brunozerli]

Why is this thread in women's issues?!!! :biggrin1:

I was just looking for witness:redface:

 

[gugukupa]

NO... Long shot have healthy guys...

 

[D_MarquisDeSodOff]

I dont think this is true at all. I'm just average in length and almost every time have to clean my chin if not farther.

 

[grnman]

Funny question,

Anyway, I pretty much dribble. I always assumed that all else being the same, the longer the hose the less pressure, which makes sense in my case. Of course there are many other factors, one of which is probably how the urethra is formed.

Jack

 

[dcho]

guys guys guys. everyone knows the penis works like a sniper rifle. duh

 

[duderino]

Hmmm... sniper riffle -- sometimes. Often like a shotgun, though. Mine, at least. I'm in the long department (not freak of nature long), 9 1/2", and very thick... In terms of cum, well, it all depends. On whether I've shot a load earlier in the day (in which case my cum usually flies even farther, 6+ feet -- slightly thinner consistancy; less mass, I assume), or several times earlier in the day (cum doesn't go far at all; usually a foot, max), or not at all (very thick cum, each shot stays together in one stream, usually goes several feet). I've got a bunch of videos in my gallery illustrating these scenarios for, ahem, research purposes...

 

[Cobalt Blue]

judging by porn there is, if anything, an inverse correlation. Presumably this is because half of the biggest guys in porn can't seem to get a full erection. Of course most of the 10"+ guys here have diamond hard cocks and leave bucket fulls of spunk dripping from the ceiling on the rare occasions they don't have somewhere better to leave it dribbling from

From the porn I have seen, there does seem to be an inverse correlation, and this would be born out by elementary physics. The narrower the tube, the higher the pressure, ergo, the more powerful the ejaculation. The furthest ejaculation distance I have seen has occurred in smaller guys; conversely, John Holmes never shot more than an inch, if that - in fact the cum seemed to just dribble out.

 

[lafever]

I know that if i don`t cum for several days then i`ve got enough jizm to condition my girlfriends hair. lol


lafever

 

[D_Pubert Stabbingpain]

Hmmm... sniper riffle -- sometimes. Often like a shotgun, though. Mine, at least. I'm in the long department (not freak of nature long), 9 1/2", and very thick... In terms of cum, well, it all depends. On whether I've shot a load earlier in the day (in which case my cum usually flies even farther, 6+ feet -- slightly thinner consistancy; less mass, I assume), or several times earlier in the day (cum doesn't go far at all; usually a foot, max), or not at all (very thick cum, each shot stays together in one stream, usually goes several feet). I've got a bunch of videos in my gallery illustrating these scenarios for, ahem, research purposes...

I agree that it depends on many circumstances, not solely one's genes *or* how your cock is "constructed." It may even depend on how your nuts hang. E.g., I have very tight nuts, not especially big, yet I have always shot gallons of cum and far. However, if I pull off a quickie JO, it is often not as powerful but sometimes surprises me.:wink:

However, I think that perhaps a narrow urethra probably helps just by plain physics (ala, smaller tube more pressure) but anyone can simulate that by squeezing your cock just under the head when you are about to shoot. Try it and report back if you don't shoot further when doing that. It will cause a few more contractions before your 1st shot and produce more cum.

BTW, anyone done a study on cut vs. uncut spurting? It seems to me that the skin sliding back and forth over the head while have an orgasm would make it much more powerful. What do you think?

 

[duderino]

I agree that it depends on many circumstances, not solely one's genes *or* how your cock is "constructed." It may even depend on how your nuts hang. E.g., I have very tight nuts, not especially big, yet I have always shot gallons of cum and far. However, if I pull off a quickie JO, it is often not as powerful but sometimes surprises me.:wink:

However, I think that perhaps a narrow urethra probably helps just by plain physics (ala, smaller tube more pressure) but anyone can simulate that by squeezing your cock just under the head when you are about to shoot. Try it and report back if you don't shoot further when doing that. It will cause a few more contractions before your 1st shot and produce more cum.

BTW, anyone done a study on cut vs. uncut spurting? It seems to me that the skin sliding back and forth over the head while have an orgasm would make it much more powerful. What do you think?

Since we brought up physics... actually, I completely disagree. All that friction, stretching, moving of the foreskin requires energy -- that will all come from your cock as it pulses. Theoretically, the foreskin would absorb some of the force of the lateral expansion during a spurt... I don't believe the difference would be significant, though. (Actually, it also might serve to constrict girth at the head -- I have no idea, as I don't have foreskin and have never been privy to an ejaculating penis that does -- or any ejaculating penis other than my own. This might -- again, likely insignificant in terms of contribution to cumshot range -- further limit urethral expansion. All that stuff has to go somewhere... force it down a narrower tube and it goes faster. In the cumshot business, range is a function of Vc (he he... cum velocity...) x Mc (cum mass), plus or minus elevation, air pressure, temperature and wind.)

Pardon me while I cycle in a fresh pocket protector...

 

[Jeffin90620]

My penis has been pretty much the same size for over 30 years. How much and how far it shoots varies and depends on my level of excitement (and possibly hydration).

 

[D_Rock_ N_Hardon]

I tend to shoot far when really aroused and I'm just over 8".

But mostly it's just a little leap rather than a "clean the celiling" job

 

[hyperionic]

i allways thought it was a matter of muscle contractions.. women tend to ejaculate when in a powerful orgasm.. Not all them ofcourse. Appearantly shooting far can be trained as a matter of 'bodybuilding'. Furthermore i also believe it's different from person to person, indeed a matter of 'construction'. As for the cut/uncut question.. i dont believe thats true. I'm uncut.. sometimes i shoot over my head and sometimes barely over my bellybutton.