WRT this idea about how "hands up don't shoot" "never happened" not with standing more than one EYE WITNESS we really do not know that was the case.
The supposed "proof" the Fox news universe and the rest of right wants to hold onto for dear life was that the medical report stated that there was no "physical evidence" that it happened which is another way of saying that the undersides of his arms that would have been exposed had he had his "hands up" had no entry wounds.
That was ALL that had ever said.
But that in no way proves he did not have his hands up it just means that the bullets that were fired at him when/if he had his hands up either missed altogether and we know for a fact some and if a recall correctly most of the rounds fired did in fact miss or were otherwise not accounted for or hit him in the torso.
The supposed "proof" the Fox news universe and the rest of right wants to hold onto for dear life was that the medical report stated that there was no "physical evidence" that it happened which is another way of saying that the undersides of his arms that would have been exposed had he had his "hands up" had no entry wounds.
That was ALL that had ever said.
But that in no way proves he did not have his hands up it just means that the bullets that were fired at him when/if he had his hands up either missed altogether and we know for a fact some and if a recall correctly most of the rounds fired did in fact miss or were otherwise not accounted for or hit him in the torso.