The "Mass" Factor - What's Yours? What's the Biggest?

Discussion in 'Sex With a Large Penis' started by D_Miltie Orgasmic, Apr 27, 2007.

  1. D_Miltie Orgasmic

    D_Miltie Orgasmic New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here's an idea my partner suggested for gauging size...

    Multiply the length by thickness (as measured with a tape measure wrapped around the thickest part of the cock).

    He's 9 X 7 which gives him a "mass factor" of 63.

    I'm 8 x 5; so my mass factor is only 40.

    Other examples: say you're (or you know someone who is) 10" x 5". You can conclude that it's a long dick, but it really doesn't have as much "mass" as a dude with a cock that's (only) 8" X 7" (mass factor: 50 vs. 56). While size may not be everything "mass" definitely is something...think about it the next time someone says they're 10"!
     
  2. burns1de

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    1,789
    Likes Received:
    8
    For me:

    8" x 6" = 48. Not bad... I guess, lol.
     
  3. D_Miltie Orgasmic

    D_Miltie Orgasmic New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    NOT bad AT ALL!!! You're pix clearly show that length alone isn't the whole story...

    Let's say "massive" cocks = a "mass factor" of 48 or greater?
     
  4. Joseph

    Verified Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2006
    Messages:
    582
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    49
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Poland
    Verified:
    Photo
    6 x 5,5 = 33
    Well I should be proud for having over 20 I guess
     
  5. D_Miltie Orgasmic

    D_Miltie Orgasmic New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    No judgements! I'm only a "40" ~

    Let's say, > 30 is "big" (someone who is 5" long may be 7" thick...I'd call that "perfect" but that's me...)
     
  6. burns1de

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    1,789
    Likes Received:
    8
    LOL, well, I certainly won't complain about my size being used as a barometer
    for others. :D
     
  7. D_Miltie Orgasmic

    D_Miltie Orgasmic New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    burns1de, I'd say your cock is pretty "epic" and definitely falls into the massive category. Uncut too? Whoa.
     
  8. Multipass

    Multipass New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London, Canada
    Someone posted this volume chart on here a while ago. It's using a different calculation but the end result is the same idea.

    oh... and i'd be 45... not massive :(
     

    Attached Files:

  9. D_Miltie Orgasmic

    D_Miltie Orgasmic New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    ...not "massive" by one person's "standard", but pretty bloody close!

    That chart is kinda confusing...it's probably easier to just multiply?
     
  10. Knight Attrition

    Knight Attrition New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    35.75 here, can I round up? Its pretty close to 36
     
  11. B_Danni-licks

    B_Danni-licks New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    UK
    my bfs mass is 112
     
  12. burns1de

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    1,789
    Likes Received:
    8
    So he's like 10.5" by 10"? His life must suck.
     
  13. Mackleanen Beebarf

    Mackleanen Beebarf New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2006
    Messages:
    344
    Likes Received:
    2
    Mine's somewhere between 45 and 50, depending on where the "official" girth measurement would be taken.
     
  14. Long&Thick

    Long&Thick New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Messages:
    276
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    I feel small, my "mass factor" is 34.5.
     
  15. mightythickcock

    Verified Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Messages:
    968
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    170
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Houston (TX, US)
    Verified:
    Photo
    56 here (8x7)
     
  16. loggerheadtop

    loggerheadtop New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Oztralia
    >While size may not be everything, "mass" definitely is something

    I'd say "while length may not be everything, ...".
    The new calculation is a welcum adjustment to the usual obsession with length, which is not necessarily what most "consumers" are looking for anyway. There's plenty of evidence right here on site that lots of women and gay btms rate the pleasure-giving potential of extra girth over that of length. So, mass seems a better, single stat guideline to what's on offer. Even better than that, though, is to continue to supply both dimensions so the length-to-girth proportion can be worked out. And with proportions, we're getting into aesthetic territory ... Is there a relevant thread?
     
  17. edaws31

    edaws31 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    i like that system i'm 36.5 (6.5 x 5.6)
     
  18. OmahaBeef

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,037
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    I come in at a measly, slightly over 60ish...

    ...OB
     
  19. D_Martin van Burden

    D_Martin van Burden Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2002
    Messages:
    3,365
    Likes Received:
    6
  20. MadCock

    Verified Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Messages:
    257
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    18
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Colorado
    Verified:
    Photo
    46.88 to 52 mass factor for me.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted