The "Mass" Factor - What's Yours? What's the Biggest?

DarkPhantom

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2005
Posts
961
Media
0
Likes
12
Points
238
Funny but inaccurate :smile:

Little like a cone & a cylinder, both can have the same length and max "girth" but still differ alot in mass.

Anyhow mine would be ~52 give or take.
 

punk09

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Posts
752
Media
337
Likes
16,524
Points
598
Location
San Francisco (California, United States)
Verification
View
Gender
Male
Wait, hard cocks are more cylinders than rectangular solids.


The proper measure is volume.

8" * 6.5" is not 52 square inches.

6.5" / 3.1415 = 2.06" diameter = 1.03" radius

3.1415 * ( 1.03 * 1.03 ) = 3.35 square inches area of section.

3.35 sq " * 8" = 26.89 cubic inches
 

DarkPhantom

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2005
Posts
961
Media
0
Likes
12
Points
238
Wait, hard cocks are more cylinders than rectangular solids.


The proper measure is volume.

8" * 6.5" is not 52 square inches.

6.5" / 3.1415 = 2.06" diameter = 1.03" radius

3.1415 * ( 1.03 * 1.03 ) = 3.35 square inches area of section.

3.35 sq " * 8" = 26.89 cubic inches

Ya, of course
 

Knight Attrition

Just Browsing
Joined
Oct 11, 2006
Posts
183
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
161
Location
Orlando, FL
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I have a tiny penis... 1.5 soft, 3 hard, so, looks like I have a mass of manhood only...

4.5 !!!!
You did it wrong your flaccid size has nothing to do with it. Its erect length x erect circumference.

Wait, hard cocks are more cylinders than rectangular solids.


The proper measure is volume.

8" * 6.5" is not 52 square inches.

6.5" / 3.1415 = 2.06" diameter = 1.03" radius

3.1415 * ( 1.03 * 1.03 ) = 3.35 square inches area of section.

3.35 sq " * 8" = 26.89 cubic inches

You are of course correct but since this isn't really about mass, its about having a single number to quickly relate one penis size to another, your system is more time consuming.

Still I refer to my previous post that the system is difficult to use because the larger you are the faster the number increases.
 

moishglukovsky

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2006
Posts
66
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
228
Location
Philadelphia
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Here's an idea my partner suggested for gauging size...

Multiply the length by thickness (as measured with a tape measure wrapped around the thickest part of the cock).

He's 9 X 7 which gives him a "mass factor" of 63.

I'm 8 x 5; so my mass factor is only 40.

Other examples: say you're (or you know someone who is) 10" x 5". You can conclude that it's a long dick, but it really doesn't have as much "mass" as a dude with a cock that's (only) 8" X 7" (mass factor: 50 vs. 56). While size may not be everything "mass" definitely is something...think about it the next time someone says they're 10"!

Why use a formula for the area of a square to measure the volume of a cylinder?

Let's assume your cock is a cylinder. Its volume would be the length and the area of the base, which is pi x r^2, r being the radius. You know the girth, which is the same as the circumference, which is pi x 2 x r.

Girth = circumference = pi x 2 x r.
So, r = circumference/(2 x pi). For our purposes here, let's estimate pi = 3.

Volume of a cylinder = Area x length = (circumference^2)/12 x length.

If you're 9" x 7", like the aforementioned gentleman : Volume = (7^2)/12 x 9 = 49/12 x 9 = 4.1 x 9 = 36.75 (cubic inches).

An average cock would be, say 6" long x 4" girth: Volume = (4^2)/12 x 6 = 16/12 x 6 = 8 cubic inches.

That was easy, wasn't it? :)
 

joejack

Cherished Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2004
Posts
727
Media
727
Likes
326
Points
283
Location
Florida
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
The Greeks (who else) figured it all out 2500 years ago: The solid geometry of the cylinder. Lets go guys. Measure girth and length. Divide girth by 6.28. Multiply result by itself. Multiply again by 3.14. Multiply again by length. Example: 6 inch girth, 8 inch length versus 8 inch girth, 6 inch length. Former is 22.93 cubic inches; latter is 30.57 cubic inches. Therefore, the shorter fat dick is 33% bigger. Fat dicks rule! Now, were any of you ladies stumped? Get it? Stumped! Hah, hah, hah!
 

meatpackingbubba

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 24, 2006
Posts
4,505
Media
104
Likes
23,737
Points
618
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Length times girth gives the surface area of a cylinder. A more precise means for determining mass is the formula for the volume of a cylinder. The formula for this is the pi times r2 times length.

To put it into simple terms: take your girth (circumference) measurement in three places; behind the head, midshaft, and the base. Then average those three measurements and divide the result by 3.1415 to obtain the average diameter of your penis.

Divide the diameter by 2 to obtain the radius. Multiply the radius number by itself (squared), and then multiply the result by 3.1415. Finally, take this result and multiply it by the length of you penis. This is its total volume in cubic inches.

Now for the demonstration as to why this is important:

surface area of a 6x5 dick: 30 square inches
surface area of a 8x6 dick: 48 square inches
60% larger

total volume of a 6x5 dick: 12 cubic inches
total volume of a 8x6 dick: 23 cubic inches
90% larger
 

Beercanthick

1st Like
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Posts
21
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
148
Gender
Male
Haven't noticed anyone mention this: Length doesn't change - unless your dick has a bend in it, BUT, width can change over the length. For myself, I liken my dick to be like a pylon, it gets much thicker as you go from the head to the base. Any measurement taken around the head of my dick would be substantially different taken from the base. I've also known guys who aren't as thick at the base as they are farther up the shaft. Or if someone has a huge, knobby dickhead...?

Just trying to help work out the kinks in the system.