Sagittarius84
Superior Member
I actually 100% disagree...I think women's unchecked sexual selectivity metrics means that most good men are overlooked as unattractive prospects(women's reticular focus means they cannot identify, often even can't perceive, the "good" man until he has demonstrated some other aspects of desirability, and on the other end a "hard" man comes with prerequisites and boundaries most men do not, and demand a higher level of performance and integrity than most women feel they should have to fulfill.Apparently, a good, hard man is difficult to find. Especially at our age.
Good men aren't hard to find, it's just most men aren't attractive enough(or considered socioeconomically desirable enough) for "good" to even be a consideration for women.
It's almost like a McDonald's paradox...the good, but average/below average earning and looking cashier that politely takes a woman's order, and rapidly serves her food with a genuine smile while multitasking around the grill(all great qualities for long term partners) is much less likely to be able to sleep with a woman waiting in line to order, than a well to do, rude, tall and attractive man that cuts her off in line without apologizing to make his order....but that woman will insist she can't find a good man, and when it comes to the men she chooses she'll lament they won't start to display qualities of the "good" man they didn't want in the 1st place.