hypolimnas
Superior Member
why is this always reported as police v. black men when it seems to be a white police against black men case?
I believe this to be a lie. When Kinsey asked the unidentified officer why he shot him, the officer's answer was, "I don't know." He did not say he missed his target. He did not apologize. He did not get medics promptly to the scene. Officer's left him there bleeding for a while, then they hadcuffed him and left him there bleeding some more. This is not how sense dictates one behaves after an accidental shooting. This is how one behaves if one hopes his victim will die.Unbelievably, the story gets worse. The cop wasn't trying to shoot the unarmed black man lying on the ground with his hands in the air: he was trying to shoot the unarmed white autistic man who was sitting next to him holding a toy truck.
North Miami Officer Was Aiming At Man With Autism, Union Chief Says (NPR, 22 July 2016)
"Fearing for Mr. Kinsey's life, the officer discharged his firearm, trying to save Mr. Kinsey's life," says John Rivera, president of the Dade County Police Benevolent Association. "And he missed, and accidentally struck Mr. Kinsey."
Rivera also declared that the case is different from other recent incidents of police shootings of black men, stating, "Folks, this is not what the rest of the nation is going through."
He added, "This is not a case of a rogue cop; this is not a case of police abuse."
How fucking bad does your judgment have to be before you count as incompetent in police work?
You think black cops are any different? I just had an incident this spring with 8 black and Latino useless pigs at my grandmother's property in the Bronx. Let me just say I wouldn't so much as spit on them if they were on fire.why is this always reported as police v. black men when it seems to be a white police against black men case?
You think black cops are any different? I just had an incident this spring with 8 black and Latino useless pigs at my grandmother's property in the Bronx. Let me just say I wouldn't so much as spit on them if they were on fire.
Sounds like Penisland is a nice place to live.No I don't no much about this issue - so I was asking. We don't have such an extreme issue with police here.
Unbelievably, the story gets worse. The cop wasn't trying to shoot the unarmed black man lying on the ground with his hands in the air: he was trying to shoot the unarmed white autistic man who was sitting next to him holding a toy truck.
North Miami Officer Was Aiming At Man With Autism, Union Chief Says (NPR, 22 July 2016)
"Fearing for Mr. Kinsey's life, the officer discharged his firearm, trying to save Mr. Kinsey's life," says John Rivera, president of the Dade County Police Benevolent Association. "And he missed, and accidentally struck Mr. Kinsey."
Rivera also declared that the case is different from other recent incidents of police shootings of black men, stating, "Folks, this is not what the rest of the nation is going through."
He added, "This is not a case of a rogue cop; this is not a case of police abuse."
How fucking bad does your judgment have to be before you count as incompetent in police work?
why is this always reported as police v. black men when it seems to be a white police against black men case?
I don't see how saying "Oh, I was trying to shoot the autistic kid with the toy truck but missed him and hit the black man lying on his back with his arms in the air" puts one in a stronger a position than saying "I shot the black man lying on his back with his arms in the air because I'm a fucking dumbass with an itchy trigger finger." The cop is plainly incompetent either way.
This.Because they can/will argue that they weren't able to hear the man saying it was a toy truck and it looked like a weapon and they were firing in self defense (which is still a lie, but one they could maybe convince a jury about).
Many of the instances have been white on black but there are cases of black officer abuses as well. The real problem is abuses by those sworn to protect and serve regardless of their color.why is this always reported as police v. black men when it seems to be a white police against black men case?
I dont know whats real and whats fake anymore . . .
Just look through this thread and you'll see apologists who see nothing wrong in what the cops did. Whenever complaints are made about blatant mistreatment and actions on behalf of the police force the usual suspects immediately appear to spout their statistics about black violence and talk of black on black crime as a way to excuse the cop's actions. Do they understand why they are seen as racists? They've apparently lost the ability to judge something without injecting their negative views on one race into it.ABC News: "Controversial" Video of a Teacher's Arrest:
Doesn't appear to be very "controversial" to me. Looks like a white cop attacking and beating a black woman for some minor traffic infraction, and his ignorant partner "explaining" to her that white people are all afraid of black people because they are so violent... I guess blatant racicm is "controvercial" in ABC's book.
A/B
Just look through this thread and you'll see apologists who see nothing wrong in what the cops did.
As AE said, and based on testimony of people who were there, this is fabrication. The police are spinning and circling the wagons already, as is routine. And this is why I distrust and disrespect cops. If the problem was just 1% of police being bad apples, it could be taken care of them, but the majority of the force comes out to defend those bad apples, and things break down.