The sabotage of obamacare begins.

phonehome

Superior Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Posts
3,896
Media
0
Likes
4,276
Points
343
Gender
Male
Adding a "public option" what ever that would be defined as or including on Healthcare.gov a plan that meets the requirements of all 50 states, state insurance commissioners, that anyone any where could buy a form of "buying insurance across state lines" which BTW is as we speak NOT "prevented" buy ANY current Federal law that is now "on the books" would be a small amendment if would hardly be a "replacement"
 

Novaboy

Superior Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2005
Posts
6,257
Media
5
Likes
8,608
Points
343
Location
Canada
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
It's a shame that this is all about money and fulfilling ridiculous election promises. Obamacare might not be perfect but one wonders what it would be like if they had not had to dilute it down so much to get it through in the first place. Trump wants to "repeal and replace" at any cost because he said he would. None of this has anything to do with supply quality healthcare for all USA citizens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Klingsor

Industrialsize

Mythical Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
22,250
Media
213
Likes
32,088
Points
618
Location
Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
‘Bare bones’ insurance policies really only work for people who are healthy
Before the Affordable Care Act, insurance companies could offer any combination of benefits in most states and legally call them a health insurance policy. A huge deductible? Coverage for only one night of hospitalization? Nothing for maternity care, mental health or medication?

If consumers were willing to buy such “bare bones” plans — and some people did, usually at very low prices — those policies were considered health insurance coverage.

“If they sold you a policy that covered [only] a toothbrush, that qualified,” said Karen Pollitz, senior fellow at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

The ACA did away with that, mainly by requiring that all health plans on the individual and small-group market include certain “essential benefits” for everyone: prescription drugs, lab services, even maternity care, to name a few.

Now Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R) wants to again allow insurers to sell whatever bare-bones coverage they desire
and consumers to purchase it. To qualify, insurers would just have to offer one plan that complies with the ACA’s comprehensive benefits standard.

It may sound good in theory — free markets and freedom of choice — and it’s an idea that has long been popular with conservatives. But experts say insurance simply doesn’t work this way, and the “Cruz amendment” would unleash destructive forces for individuals without employer-sponsored coverage as well as for the system.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...f_story.html?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.122f75f28d03
 

BULLDOG00

Admired Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2016
Posts
1,741
Media
0
Likes
905
Points
148
Location
United States
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Liberals, which scenario do your prefer:

1. Leave Obamacare in place as-is.
2. Repeal Obamacare with no replacement
3. Repeal and replace Obamacare with a new free market based plan with protections for the poor and the uninsurable.
 

StormfrontFL

Superior Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Posts
8,903
Media
4
Likes
6,854
Points
358
Location
United States
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I think any intelligent person (a non-liberal) would realize he meant twelve thousand dollars per year.
Not what he said. Considering he often seems out off touch with reality it's not surprising he thinks it's that low. Remember that George Bush didn't know the price of an object at the grocery store.

Also funny that your kind believed what was said was so important when Obama accidentally said 57 states.
 

StormfrontFL

Superior Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Posts
8,903
Media
4
Likes
6,854
Points
358
Location
United States
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Liberals, which scenario do your prefer:

1. Leave Obamacare in place as-is.
2. Repeal Obamacare with no replacement
3. Repeal and replace Obamacare with a new free market based plan with protections for the poor and the uninsurable.
or 4) fix what is wrong in the ACA instead of scrapping everything and instead giving coverage in name only.
 

BULLDOG00

Admired Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2016
Posts
1,741
Media
0
Likes
905
Points
148
Location
United States
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Not what he said. Considering he often seems out off touch with reality it's not surprising he thinks it's that low. Remember that George Bush didn't know the price of an object at the grocery store.

Also funny that your kind believed what was said was so important when Obama accidentally said 57 states.

You've never misspoke? Get a life dude. I couldn't give two craps about Obama's 57 states.