The trump presidency

Bigbailey12

Legendary Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Posts
1,917
Media
16
Likes
2,176
Points
133
Location
Connecticut (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Larry Kudlow’s history of bad economic calls

Published: Mar 15, 2018 1:07 p.m. ET
Trump’s new economist blew the ’90s boom and the ’08 collapse
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/kudlows-history-of-bad-economic-calls-2018-03-15
6 of Larry Kudlow’s Not-So-on-the-Money Predictions
By Deborah B. Solomon and Kitty Bennett

March 15, 2018
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/15/business/larry-kudlows-not-so-on-the-money-predictions.html
Man who swore ‘there’s no recession coming’ in 2007 now Trump’s economic adviser
When it comes to expertise, Larry Kudlow should fit right in with the rest of the Trump administration
https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/03...-economic-adviser-consistently-gets-it-wrong/
Larry Kudlow Will Be Trump's Top Economic Adviser. Here Are His Best and Worst Calls(there were no good calls)
http://fortune.com/2018/03/14/donald-trump-larry-kudlow-gary-cohn/

Kudlow will help Trump ‘sleepwalk’ into a 'tremendous fiscal collision,’ says former boss David Stockman

Trump’s new economic adviser is really bad at economics. Here are the receipts.
Larry Kudlow has made some astoundingly bad predictions, even for a CNBC pundit.
https://thinkprogress.org/larry-kudlow-bad-economic-predictions-f02ebf47c918/

Larry Kudlow, Who Assured Us All Was Well in 2007, to Be Trump Economic Adviser
By Hrafnkell Haraldsson on Fri, Dec 16th, 2016 at 7:59 am

"Discussion of economic policy is now monopolized by people who have been wrong about everything, have learned nothing from the experience"
https://www.politicususa.com/2016/12/16/larry-kudlow-assured-2007-be-trump-economic-adviser.html





I watched Stockman on CNBC. The deficit tripled under Obama but all of a sudden there is all this concern
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elmer Gantry

Industrialsize

Mythical Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
22,250
Media
213
Likes
32,123
Points
618
Location
Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I watched Stockman on CNBC. The deficit tripled under Obama but all of a sudden there is all this concern
Deficit could hit $1 trillion in 2018, and that's before the full impact of tax cuts

2018 could be the year the dam bursts on the federal deficit.

Back in June, the Congressional Budget Office projected that the budget deficit — government expenses exceeding revenues — would drop to $563 billion in 2018 from the $666 billion shortfall the Treasury Department declared in the 2017 fiscal year, which ended Sept. 30.

Now budget experts outside government say the 2018 total could exceed $1 trillion because of series of bills being passed in quick succession, and decisions to scrap what were already weak limits on spending.

The tax package Congress sent to President Trump will cut government revenues by $135 billion in 2018, a figure that rises to $280 billion in 2019, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

On top of that, Congress approved emergency disaster aid bills totaling $15 billion in September, $36.5 billion in October, and this week is arguing over adding another $81 billion to address California wildfires and Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria. Barring any last minute decision to pay for it, that spending will be added to the 2018 deficit.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-thats-before-full-impact-tax-cuts/969347001/
 
  • Like
Reactions: b.c.

Bigbailey12

Legendary Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Posts
1,917
Media
16
Likes
2,176
Points
133
Location
Connecticut (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Deficit could hit $1 trillion in 2018, and that's before the full impact of tax cuts

2018 could be the year the dam bursts on the federal deficit.

Back in June, the Congressional Budget Office projected that the budget deficit — government expenses exceeding revenues — would drop to $563 billion in 2018 from the $666 billion shortfall the Treasury Department declared in the 2017 fiscal year, which ended Sept. 30.

Now budget experts outside government say the 2018 total could exceed $1 trillion because of series of bills being passed in quick succession, and decisions to scrap what were already weak limits on spending.

The tax package Congress sent to President Trump will cut government revenues by $135 billion in 2018, a figure that rises to $280 billion in 2019, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

On top of that, Congress approved emergency disaster aid bills totaling $15 billion in September, $36.5 billion in October, and this week is arguing over adding another $81 billion to address California wildfires and Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria. Barring any last minute decision to pay for it, that spending will be added to the 2018 deficit.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-thats-before-full-impact-tax-cuts/969347001/
Again no mention of Obama’s spending?? And how many trillions of dollars were because of Obama?
 

Industrialsize

Mythical Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
22,250
Media
213
Likes
32,123
Points
618
Location
Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Again no mention of Obama’s spending?? And how many trillions of dollars were because of Obama?
You've deflected from defending Larry Kudlow with trashing Obama. Trump is president and by monetary metrics, the economy is doing a little worse under him. His new economic adviser will have no clue how to improve the economy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: keenobserver

LittleBuzzSaw

Admired Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Posts
1,678
Media
0
Likes
750
Points
123
Age
44
Location
Texas (United States)
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
So if you read about a murder in the WaPo, no murder was committed, right? Grow up.
Sadly that’s precisely the attitude many here have when given any source that isn’t obviously liberal biased, or at the very hint of conservativeness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elmer Gantry

Industrialsize

Mythical Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
22,250
Media
213
Likes
32,123
Points
618
Location
Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Sadly that’s precisely the attitude many here have when given any source that isn’t obviously liberal biased, or at the very hint of conservativeness.
If I read about a murder in the Wall Street Journal(a conservative newspaper), I would believe it.
 

LittleBuzzSaw

Admired Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Posts
1,678
Media
0
Likes
750
Points
123
Age
44
Location
Texas (United States)
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
If I read about a murder in the Wall Street Journal(a conservative newspaper), I would believe it.
As any reasonable person should. One should always know that almost every news source is biased. Their job isn’t to report news, it’s to sell stories. So very few sources are 100% neutral, and they aren’t the most popular because they don’t sensationalize things to sell the stories. Ratings get publicity, not integrity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elmer Gantry

Industrialsize

Mythical Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
22,250
Media
213
Likes
32,123
Points
618
Location
Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
As any reasonable person should. One should always know that almost every news source is biased. Their job isn’t to report news, it’s to sell stories. So very few sources are 100% neutral, and they aren’t the most popular because they don’t sensationalize things to sell the stories. Ratings get publicity, not integrity.
And any reasonable person would know that the Washington Post is a reliable source of news. Historically they broke open Watergate, were instrumental in getting the Pentagon Papers in the hands of the public etc.(but you don't like the stories that they print. Keep getting your news from Breitbart and infowars)
 

LittleBuzzSaw

Admired Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Posts
1,678
Media
0
Likes
750
Points
123
Age
44
Location
Texas (United States)
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
And any reasonable person would know that the Washington Post is a reliable source of news. Historically they broke open Watergate, were instrumental in getting the Pentagon Papers in the hands of the public etc.(but you don't like the stories that they print. Keep getting your news from Breitbart and infowars)
I agree with the first part of your statement.

The second is purely (and flagrantly incorrect) speculation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elmer Gantry

Chrysippus

Superior Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Posts
4,566
Media
0
Likes
3,827
Points
148
Location
Oregon (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Sadly that’s precisely the attitude many here have when given any source that isn’t obviously liberal biased, or at the very hint of conservativeness.
From where I twirl, the attitude is common to some conservatives as well as to some liberals. Partisanship isn’t limited to just one side of the spectrum.
Blinders=blind?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LittleBuzzSaw

Bigbailey12

Legendary Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Posts
1,917
Media
16
Likes
2,176
Points
133
Location
Connecticut (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
And any reasonable person would know that the Washington Post is a reliable source of news. Historically they broke open Watergate, were instrumental in getting the Pentagon Papers in the hands of the public etc.(but you don't like the stories that they print. Keep getting your news from Breitbart and infowars)
Oh don’t forget must be a cave dweller if you watch FOX .. lol
 

Chrysippus

Superior Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Posts
4,566
Media
0
Likes
3,827
Points
148
Location
Oregon (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
[
Oh don’t forget must be a cave dweller if you watch FOX .. lol

I watch Fox periodically, so I’m not a cave dweller? Fox offers some factual coverage when it chooses to do so. I also like to see what the Fox propaganda arm is presenting. I can distinguish between fact and fiction.
 
D

deleted15807

Guest
I watch Fox periodically, so I’m not a cave dweller? Fox offers some factual coverage when it chooses to do so. I also like to see what the Fox propaganda arm is presenting. I can distinguish between fact and fiction.

And it's good you can. Most Americans cannot to say nothing how they blur the distinction. However this is a network that is openly racist and misogynistic. And for that alone I refuse to play any role in its success.

Shepard Smith: Fox News opinion hosts 'don't really have rules'

Addendum - I did refer to "Fox and Friends" rather than whatever other part of that Ministry Of Truth calls itself.

Still:

upload_2018-3-16_17-59-6.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: b.c.

Bigbailey12

Legendary Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Posts
1,917
Media
16
Likes
2,176
Points
133
Location
Connecticut (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
[


I watch Fox periodically, so I’m not a cave dweller? Fox offers some factual coverage when it chooses to do so. I also like to see what the Fox propaganda arm is presenting. I can distinguish between fact and fiction.
I agree... the guy with the anger issues referred to people that watch Fox as “ cave dwellers “
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elmer Gantry

Elmer Gantry

LPSG Legend
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Posts
48,004
Media
53
Likes
264,088
Points
518
Location
Australia
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
And it's good you can. Most Americans cannot to say nothing how they blur the distinction. However this is a network that is openly racist and misogynistic. And for that alone I refuse to play any role in its success.

Shepard Smith: Fox News opinion hosts 'don't really have rules'

Addendum - I did refer to "Fox and Friends" rather than whatever other part of that Ministry Of Truth calls itself.

You do realise you just used a "study" from The Hill to attempt to make a point?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LittleBuzzSaw