again
unfortunately
i think it will take out the next years
you folk dont seem to readily change
apart from not having a strong opposition
View web version
September 12, 2019 | Follow Michael Cohen on Twitter
ALL HE TOUCHES HE CORRUPTS
Jim Watson/AFP/Getty
In my
Sunday column I wrote about Sharpiegate, which has become the shorthand description for President Trump's now more than week-long obsession with being proved correct in his false claim that Hurricane Dorian was going to hit the state of Alabama.
The scandal "is emblematic," I wrote, "of the president’s frightening inability to accept and acknowledge reality."
In retrospect, I underestimated the depths to which this story would go. At the time, I noted that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) had "offered no comment on Trump’s Dorian falsehoods — basically allowing the president’s lie to stand."
Then things got interesting.
On Friday, the NOAA put out an anonymous
press release claiming that it had provided the president with information that "tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama," and it chastised the Birmingham National Weather Service for tweeting a week ago Sunday that "Alabama will NOT see any impacts from #Dorian."
Alabama being subjected to tropical-storm winds is not quite the same thing as being hit by a hurricane - as Trump claimed at the time. And the criticism of the Birmingham weather service's statement, which was correct and proper and came in response to public fears raised by Trump's tweet, has sparked widespread anger within the weather service for politicizing the work of the agency.
But it gets even worse.
Over the weekend,
we found out that the NOAA had instructed agency staff to avoid making any public statements that would contradict the president.
As Jane Lubchenco,
a NOAA administrator under President Obama, put it in The Washington Post: “This looks like classic politically motivated obfuscation to justify inaccurate statements made by the boss. It is truly sad to see political appointees undermining the superb, life-saving work of NOAA’s talented and dedicated career servants.”
Trump's manipulation of the federal government to lie on his behalf is, in itself, is a huge scandal ... but wait, there's more!
On Monday, the New York Times
reported that the Secretary of Commerce, Wilbur Ross, "threatened to fire top employees at the federal scientific agency responsible for weather forecasts last Friday after the agency’s Birmingham office contradicted President Trump’s claim that Hurricane Dorian might hit Alabama." NOAA is under the purview of the Commerce Department.
Over the next several days, news
emerged that Ross had been told by White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney to get NOAA in line ... and by Wednesday it was revealed in the New York Times that Mulvaney was acting on the president's orders.
In one sense, Sharpiegate is the scandal that keeps on giving. It has everything - man-child narcissism, badly doctored weather maps, terrifying presidential tweets, and now public corruption. (As Daniel Drezner rightly put it, Sharpiegate is the "
perfect synecdoche" for this White House).
In another deeper more profound sense, Sharpiegate is yet one more example of the extraordinary harm that Trump and his coterie of minions of bootlickers are doing to American democracy. The Secretary of Commerce instructing public officials to lie about weather forecasts - and threatening to fire them if they don't - is, even for this administration, a remarkable abuse of power. That Ross still has his job - and that few in Congress have called for his resignation - is one more reminder of how inured we've become to the Trump administration's astonishing corruption. That it turns out the rot goes all the way into the White House and the president himself is an even greater scandal - and also completely predictable.
Keep in mind: The Commerce Department includes the Bureau of Economic Analysis, which is responsible for issuing a host of key economic statistics. Is it so hard to imagine Ross instructing the bureau to manipulate data in order to avoid contradicting the president?
To be sure, the federal bureaucracy is run by the president, but that doesn't mean Trump has the right to instruct federal employees to lie and obfuscate on his behalf. Their responsibility is not to the president, but to the American people and the Constitution they all swear an oath to uphold.
As we've seen over and over again, this concept of professionalism and probity is one that the president is not able to wrap his head around. Doing the right thing will always take a back seat to him being proved right, even when he is unambiguously wrong. What makes this situation so much worse is that Trump has surrounded himself with individuals who are more than willing to lie, threaten, and violate the public trust on his behalf.
Trump's corruption is not just restricted to the many ways in which he is enriching himself (and
there was more news on that front this week), but he is also infecting the entire government with his amorality.