The truth about big cocks

[gavlenils]

I'll bet that if you have worked out at a gym for very long you have witnessed the hilarity of watching the big muscle dude with a little dick slink away in shame when he sees the guy with an icky body but a huge dick naked!

I've seen this IRL at my gym, and it's pure POWER...size really matters in situations like this.

But then again, for some people it's no big deal at all :smile:

 

[wallyj84]

but there are different kinds of intelligences. a person who can compute complex equations in their head is differen than someone who can memorize poetry and analyze it critically, and they're both different from someone who can comprehend the complexities of a car engine just by looking at it.

That's silly. Only one of those people that you listed is actually intelligent, the equations guy, and he/she can probably do the other two things fairly easy.

in the same way, a person with natural intelligence who slacks off all the time can fall short of someone of average intelligence who works their ass off. there are all kinds of aspects that make us unique, something about us that makes us "superior" to someone else, while "inferior" to another person. so why bother getting hung up on one thing like penis size?

I'm hung up on it, because I'm specifically talking about sexual ability. For men, cock size is a major determining factor in ones sexual ability. Therefore if a person has a big dick, they are, usually, sexually superior to someone with a small dick.

Wallyj84: Your analogy is way off base. You suggest that dick size is the only measure of sexual prowess -- totally incorrect. The right size dick, and not the biggest, tends to bring most pleasure to women. As for men, I am not quite sure -- gay men tend to admire monster cocks, but I fail to see the pleasure of ramming a telephone pole up your ass.

I'm not saying that dick size is the only factor in determining ones sexual ability, but it's the main factor.

 

[B_ILIW]

Let's look at it another way. Say there are two people and one of them is smarter than the other. Isn't the smarter person is intellectually superior to the less intelligent person?

It is the same with dicks. A man with a small cock is sexually inferior.

the idea here is that the OP reckons he is totally inferior for having a tiny prick. everybody has strengths and weaknesses.

 

[the_reverend]

That's silly. Only one of those people that you listed is actually intelligent, the equations guy, and he/she can probably do the other two things fairly easy.

zip up. your ignorance is showing.

I'm hung up on it, because I'm specifically talking about sexual ability. For men, cock size is a major determining factor in ones sexual ability. Therefore if a person has a big dick, they are, usually, sexually superior to someone with a small dick.

i'll agree with one thing...you're definitely hung up on it. the rest of what you say is not necessarily true. yes, there are a good number of women and men who prefer large cocks. there are also a good number who prefer average sized and some who prefer smaller as well and some who don't care as long as you can use it. there's no automatic superiority granted those of us with larger cocks beyond the arbitrary "i have a bigger cock than you." but someone else has a bigger cock than me. and i'm not automatically their inferior because of it. YOUR hang up does not equal an absolute truth.

 

[wallyj84]

zip up. your ignorance is showing.

Don't be delusional. There are some skills that show intelligence, and some skills that don't. Mathematical skills show a high level of intelligence, literary theory does not.

i'll agree with one thing...you're definitely hung up on it. the rest of what you say is not necessarily true. yes, there are a good number of women and men who prefer large cocks. there are also a good number who prefer average sized and some who prefer smaller as well and some who don't care as long as you can use it. there's no automatic superiority granted those of us with larger cocks beyond the arbitrary "i have a bigger cock than you." but someone else has a bigger cock than me. and i'm not automatically their inferior because of it. YOUR hang up does not equal an absolute truth.

If there is one thing I've learned from this board is that most women love big cocks and those that don't are either just statistical anomalies or just haven't had a big cock yet.

This isn't a hang up, this is just a fact of life.

 

[Ramsey]

I'm hung up on it, because I'm specifically talking about sexual ability. For men, cock size is a major determining factor in ones sexual ability. Therefore if a person has a big dick, they are, usually, sexually superior to someone with a small dick.

Size is not an ability. It's a trait. A woman with large breasts doesn't inherently have any ability over another woman with small breasts. For most men a large dick is just a bragging factor, and more men than women are hung up over it.

Being able to thrust like crazy and keep nogging those crazy ladies who need to be pounded like a steamdrill to come, without coming yourself, is an ability. Knowing how to touch your woman/man in ways that get them hot under the collar and be real and passionate and know them and strike a cord in their soul, is an ability. Penis size is probably the single thing about sex on the man's side, that is not an ability. All the other factors are just as important, and totaled up, more so. And all those can be improved and trained and learned.

 

[RawDog]

Size is not an ability. It's a trait.

What about guys who, through a lot of hard work, have increased the size of their dicks? Some of us think it's important enough to get that extra inch that we do a lot of crazy stuff that ends up working.

I'd consider that an ability.

 

[the_reverend]

Don't be delusional. There are some skills that show intelligence, and some skills that don't. Mathematical skills show a high level of intelligence, literary theory does not.

no, they show different KINDS of intelligence.

Theory of multiple intelligences - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ain't learning fun?

If there is one thing I've learned from this board is that most women love big cocks and those that don't are either just statistical anomalies or just haven't had a big cock yet.

This isn't a hang up, this is just a fact of life.

so...you've learned from a site focused on big cocks that women like big cocks, huh? yeah, that's a fair and balanced sample right there...

it's not a fact of life because it's not a fact. if you get off on feeling inferior, that's your business. but unless you have some hard data to back up your assertions beyond your own feelings of insecurity and anecdotally citing "oh, i read a comment on a website," it's really not a fact.

and i have a bigger cock than you so you should submit and admit i'm right.

 

[wallyj84]

Size is not an ability. It's a trait. A woman with large breasts doesn't inherently have any ability over another woman with small breasts. For most men a large dick is just a bragging factor, and more men than women are hung up over it.

It is a trait, yes, but it's a trait that is a major factor in determining your sexual ability.

no, they show different KINDS of intelligence.

Theory of multiple intelligences - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ain't learning fun?

There are many criticisms of the multiple intelligences theory. In fact, there are quite a few listed in the wikipedia article that you've linked. I think the most damning is that there is no empirical evidence for the existence of multiple intelligences.

so...you've learned from a site focused on big cocks that women like big cocks, huh? yeah, that's a fair and balanced sample right there...

it's not a fact of life because it's not a fact. if you get off on feeling inferior, that's your business. but unless you have some hard data to back up your assertions beyond your own feelings of insecurity and anecdotally citing "oh, i read a comment on a website," it's really not a fact.

and i have a bigger cock than you so you should submit and admit i'm right.

This thread has a bunch of articles that prove the importance of penis size in sexual satisfaction.

 

[MercyfulFate]

It is a trait, yes, but it's a trait that is a major factor in determining your sexual ability.



There are many criticisms of the multiple intelligences theory. In fact, there are quite a few listed in the wikipedia article that you've linked. I think the most damning is that there is no empirical evidence for the existence of multiple intelligences.




This thread has a bunch of articles that prove the importance of penis size in sexual satisfaction.

Size is not a major factor in determining ability. What the hell?

 

[wallyj84]

Size is not a major factor in determining ability. What the hell?

Yes it is.

 

[LilJock]

Sorry. I don't mean to piss on anyone's parade here, but any guy who thinks he's superior because he's got a big beer-bottle of a wang is a loser . . .with one "O".

If ya got a big schwantz and can't spell "MOM" even when yer spotted the "M" and the "M". . . if ya haven't figgered out how to open the "child-proof" aspirin bottle. . . if ya don't know that the correct response to yer wife when she asks if ya like her new dress is ALWAYS "Yes" . . . then, by any stretch of the term, ya can't be called superior to anyone.

OK. OK. I'll admit having a bigun is an advantage sometimes in the bedroom. But I suspect there are a lot of blushing brides out there who've married the telephone repair guy cuz he brought along his own pole, and who've silently cried after the honeymoon's in the rear view mirror. . . "Lord, I wish he'd learn to put away his coloring books when he's done coloring!"

I always look at it this way. . . when a chick falls for me, I know it's for something else than my dick! :smile:

 

[MercyfulFate]

Yes it is.

No, it isn't. A guy with 6 inches could be a vastly superior lover to the guy with 10.

 

[D_Connor Condompopper]

i just posted a thread similar with my problems with it:

i know it's fun to brag about our size in this forum, but i have to say with all humility i've had a lot of problems with women bleeding because of my size.

i've been with many women where we're having wonderful, intense, great sex and they start bleeding. it kills the mood and the evening.

it happens so frequently with me that it's becoming a huge problem.

not really sure what to do. i know it's fun to have a big one, but it can also be a curse.

any thoughts?

thanks,

 

[MercyfulFate]

i just posted a thread similar with my problems with it:

i know it's fun to brag about our size in this forum, but i have to say with all humility i've had a lot of problems with women bleeding because of my size.

i've been with many women where we're having wonderful, intense, great sex and they start bleeding. it kills the mood and the evening.

it happens so frequently with me that it's becoming a huge problem.

not really sure what to do. i know it's fun to have a big one, but it can also be a curse.

any thoughts?

thanks,

I don't believe anything you say.

 

[wallyj84]

No, it isn't. A guy with 6 inches could be a vastly superior lover to the guy with 10.

Only if the 10" man is impotent or horribly deficient in every other area.

Everything being equal, a man with a big cock will be a superior lover to a man with an average cock.

 

[D_Czarova Zucchini]

i just posted a thread similar with my problems with it:

i know it's fun to brag about our size in this forum, but i have to say with all humility i've had a lot of problems with women bleeding because of my size.

i've been with many women where we're having wonderful, intense, great sex and they start bleeding. it kills the mood and the evening.

it happens so frequently with me that it's becoming a huge problem.

not really sure what to do. i know it's fun to have a big one, but it can also be a curse.

any thoughts?

thanks,

SHIT!!!

how many times are you posting this? and where? and why?

to promote your blog?

http://www.lpsg.org/179615-bleeding-blessing-or-curse.html

 

[D_Czarova Zucchini]

. I think the most damning is that there is no empirical evidence for the existence of multiple intelligences.

oh puh-leeze go to any academic setting and you can tell the verbal types from the math types! everyone has "absent-minded professor" stories. tales of street-wise con men fooling MBA are a dime a dozen.

"multiple intelligences" has as much explanatory power as "g"

 

[wallyj84]

oh puh-leeze go to any academic setting and you can tell the verbal types from the math types! everyone has "absent-minded professor" stories. tales of street-wise con men fooling MBA are a dime a dozen.

"multiple intelligences" has as much explanatory power as "g"

You sound like another liberal arts major who doesn't want to admit that any science major excel in the liberal arts, but that liberal arts majors generally fail in science. lol

 

[D_Czarova Zucchini]

You sound like another liberal arts major who doesn't want to admit that any science major excel in the liberal arts, but that liberal arts majors generally fail in science. lol

but liberal arts majors get more pussy