- Joined
- Dec 23, 2006
- Posts
- 22,256
- Media
- 213
- Likes
- 32,282
- Points
- 618
- Location
- Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
vid speaks for itself:
YouTube - 5 Years Too Many
how about ALL of my anger.......Direct part of your "anger" at G.H.W. Bush. He started it.
Direct part of your "anger" at G.H.W. Bush. He started it.
I'd say that's fair.how about ALL of my anger.......
You can call me "Steve". :smile:No, you started it :biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1:
Your right SteveHd shrub senior did start it.
The British were openly lied to with unproven information about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction that were a direct threat to the UK, that's why we were there, but why was America there?
That's a genuine question before someone start bitching about anit americanisms.
Lied to? That's quite a leap from bad information. Whom are you accusing of lying?The British were openly lied to with unproven information about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction that were a direct threat to the UK, that's why we were there, but why was America there?
Lied to? That's quite a leap from bad information. Whom are you accusing of lying?
No, sorry, it's exactly as it reads.
In the UK, we were told that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction that are a real threat to UK security.
When this was questioned the governemnt blamed MI5/6 for bad intelligence, but by then, we were at war with Iraq and honering our 'special relationship' as Blair called it, with the states.
Don't try and make this about anti americanism, frankly it pisses me off with the amount of people on here bitching that no one likes the states.
I asked a question, thats it, you've just read why the UK was there, why was America.
That's interesting. I hadn't heard that spin before on the UK's involvement in Iraq. I thought they had their own independent intelligence. Are you insinuating that it was the US that lied to them? Does that make it their fault? convenient.