One reason for the GOP's obligation to start a wars is because their largest campaign contributors are usually arms manufacturers. From Lockheed to Northrop, The GOP can guarantee these business a long, protracted war. If there is no country that poses an appreciable threat, then one of the following must be done:
- Wag the dog and construct an invisible enemy. Reagan was incredibly proficient at this -- getting Americans to spend $1 trillion on the Star Wars project to protect America from Soviet ICBMs. This venture was bogus and didn't accomplish anything. It astounds me that Americans were gullible enough to pay for nothing but $3,000 toilet seats. Since the budget was top secret, we'll never know who really got rich; It certainly wasn't the American people.
- Choose a poor country with a small military on the other side of the world. Spin their appearance and make them into a threatening "rogue state." Of course, the Geneva convention and the U.N. won't permit the U.S. to attack for no good reason. Make some cartoon diagrams and get a credible looking guy like Colin Powell to claim that this small, poor country is a huge threat to the world.... and hope that France keeps quiet.
I am all for the Iraqi pullout, but I don't think that it will go smoothly; Saddam was a tyrant, but he used his iron fist to keep relative peace between the Sunnis and the Shiites. If the Americans pull out, there needs to be a U.N. peacekeeping force installed that will prevent an Iran-backed civil war in Iraq.
As thousands of Iraqi civilians die each month, Bush continues to insist that he knows exactly what he's doing in Iraq. Of course, he also said that the war would last "a few months," that the war was good for the economy, and that there were WMDs in Iraq. As he said himself, history will prove his laudability.
There were a lot of us who felt that way, pup. But what happened was that the Bush administration pulled what I call a "McCarthy". And that is to whip up the nationalistic notions of the American people so strongly that to offer any dissent was considered "unpatriotic". In fact, GWB suggested that time after time.
The undeniably illegal "Patriot" act was passed by browbeating the House. It's possibly the most unconstitutional act ever created, all done under the frenzied cloud of 9/11. I suppose in times of crisis a government can either protect it's people or take advantage of them.
I believe that McCarthyism only works with every second generation or so, and JustAsking's second quote seems to support this. Americans seem to eventually get wise to their subjugators and eventually turn on them -- whether it be Joe McCarthy, Jim Baker or George W. Bush. I doubt that Bush will face a significant backlash, but I'm sure, as with the aforementioned, there will be plenty of people asking, "What every happened to?" A few decades from now. Bush's approval rating is now 18%. This a record low for any president. He has ruined the Republican party to advance his own agenda.
Americans are very vulnerable to manipulation like this, and it is unfortunate that it is so easy to do. The sentiment was so strong that most elected officials voted the way the public sentiment was going.
Unfortunately Americans haven't learned much from McCarthyism. I wonder if it's even taught in public schools. How many livelihoods and reputations were immutably devastated from that witch hunt?
Yes, many in America openly opposed the war even from the very beginning. They were in the minority. The spinsters had done their job.
When Saddam was deposed and the Battle for Baghdad was over, their numbers grew.
Mission accomplished. That's when the troops should have been pulled out.
The Americans were sold on a quick and painless little war. Those who thought that it was a bad idea were ridiculed by the spinsters and were told this war might last a few months at most, that the country was so oil rich that it would pay for its own reconstruction, that the American troops would be greeted as liberators, and that once Saddam was out of the way democracy would flourish and all would be right as rain.
As the weeks and months dragged on public opinion turned increasingly more and more against the war. You can find charts that track this change. The 2006 mid-term elections, in which Democrats won significant victories in both houses of congress, was seen by most as a referendum on the war and the president and as evidence that the American people were now staunchly against both.
I didn't know you were so anti-American.
"The point is we have had a good battle plan, and it's a battle plan that will succeed." -- Colin L. Powell.