There are no degrees of uniqueness.

ManlyBanisters

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Posts
12,253
Media
0
Likes
58
Points
183
Something is either unique or it is not.

A person or thing cannot be very unique, quite unique or a bit unique. A person or thing is either one of a kind or it is not.

Even almost unique doesn't cut it and totally unique is just a tautology.

So please stop doing it. You're pissing me off.
 

TurkeyWithaSunburn

Legendary Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
3,589
Media
25
Likes
1,226
Points
608
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
OK we won't tell you how "uniquely unique" you are. :redface: :tongue:

I have heard that phrase used and they didn't even realize how stupid it sounded.

You are right either it is one of a kind or it isn't.

*prepares for :chairshot:*​
 

D_Gunther Snotpole

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Posts
13,632
Media
0
Likes
75
Points
193
Manly, you are quite uniquely anal.:cool:

The earliest meanings of unique when it entered English around the beginning of the 17th century were “single, sole” and “having no equal.” By the mid-19th century unique had developed a wider meaning, “not typical, unusual,” and it is in this wider sense that it is compared: The foliage on the late-blooming plants is more unique than that on the earlier varieties. The comparison of so-called absolutes in senses that are not absolute is standard in all varieties of speech and writing.

[source]
 

petite

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Posts
7,199
Media
2
Likes
146
Points
208
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Female
Something is either unique or it is not.

A person or thing cannot be very unique, quite unique or a bit unique. A person or thing is either one of a kind or it is not.

Even almost unique doesn't cut it and totally unique is just a tautology.

So please stop doing it. You're pissing me off.

Many people use the words "totally" and "very" as meaningless intensifiers, "bit" or "quite" as meiosis as a meaningless intensifier, which I also frequently do, but you are correct that it isn't grammatically correct to do so when the word cannot logically be intensified.

I am not bothered by the grammatical mistakes of others, so I tend to be careless with my grammar when I speak and write.

I agree with you 110%.

That's hilarious!
 
D

deleted3782

Guest
This reminds me of what architect Frank Lloyd Wright once said of his client Aline Barnsdale "She was neither neo, quasi, or psuedo." He designed for her Hollyhock House. I always liked that description. Its kinda quasi psuedo unique.
 

D_Geffarde Phartsmeller

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Posts
1,198
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
123
Something is either unique or it is not.

A person or thing cannot be very unique, quite unique or a bit unique. A person or thing is either one of a kind or it is not.

Even almost unique doesn't cut it and totally unique is just a tautology.

So please stop doing it. You're pissing me off.

What inspired this? Specific post, specific situation, etc. or just something that's been on your mind?
 

D_Gunther Snotpole

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Posts
13,632
Media
0
Likes
75
Points
193
I'll agree. It's a black-and-white concept. People don't like those.
No it's not.
As one poster noted above:

The earliest meanings of unique when it entered English around the beginning of the 17th century were “single, sole” and “having no equal.” By the mid-19th century unique had developed a wider meaning, “not typical, unusual,” and it is in this wider sense that it is compared: The foliage on the late-blooming plants is more unique than that on the earlier varieties. The comparison of so-called absolutes in senses that are not absolute is standard in all varieties of speech and writing.

So someone was trying to help manly.
But did she lissen?
Noooo.