I have to admit, mindseye, I perhaps posted too quickly, and actually felt a little bad about it (not too much, but just a tiny little bit) because he did back off.I've gotten PM's from mr deawayne, too -- and "troll" is a little strong to describe the behavior. It sounds like he's acting out of loneliness and desperation for attention, and not out of deliberately wanting to piss people off. (DC_DEEP's pointed out that when asked to leave, he does -- not a characteristic of most trolls.)
I imagine some kid living in a household so repressed they don't even allow punctuation*, who just discovered masturbation last week, and is in too big a hurry to find out what else is out there.
* after all, Jesus ain't never had no periods, neither!
Now, the other one who may or may not be a troll, in the other thread, who refuses to answer direct questions, denies logic when you beat it over the head with facts, and insists on arguing a non-topic and thread derailment, well, maybe we should keep an eye on it.
<sigh> and I just saw that a reincarnated troll got re-banned. It never ends, does it? And the pipsqueak is walking a fine line. I still think it may be one of two dead trolls back to haunt us.I know the pipsqueak you're talking about, and there's definitely a signal-to-noise ratio problem there. Argumentative is not the same as disruptive per se, but the hollow-er the argument and the less substantial the points raised, the less distinct the two are.
By the way, you think any of those trolls would have the balls to take that attitude with a gayboy like you or me in real life?
I'd know exactly what to do with it. In academia, all my trolls are disposed of at the end of the term.6. Show that a bridgeless connected graph G contains a strongly connected digraph.
Who cares if it's strongly connected? A graph doesn't have to be strongly connected to have a career! QED! QED!
Heheh, you misplaced a quote tag... I wanted to quote your example, it made me laugh. When I saw the "QED! QED!" part, for some silly reason, I heard it in my mind with Granny Clampett's voice, like when she was hollering for Jed.I teach a course in proof, so I receive a lot of (unintentional) bad reasoning. Still, if I got to read something like:
I'd know exactly what to do with it. In academia, all my trolls are disposed of at the end of the term.
The net wouldn't be half the fun it was if we didn't have the trolls around to make us feel all super intelligent.
I have to agree. And, I know this might get me flamed a bit (Stop! Drop! And Roll!), but I can't help but feel a little sorry for them. It kind of feels like kicking that one kid in school while he's down, you know the one that is really irritating and kind of smells funny, but he has that sad, vacant little look in his eyes and is always by himself at the lunchtime so you can't do it so you sneak him your snack cake instead? True story. Yes, hello, everyone. My name is Honey,and I'm a woosaholic.
Yes, and thank you for the cake but I would have much preferred some Hohos. That smell was Vicks vapor rub by the way.
Heheh, you misplaced a quote tag... I wanted to quote your example, it made me laugh. When I saw the "QED! QED!" part, for some silly reason, I heard it in my mind with Granny Clampett's voice, like when she was hollering for Jed.
Yes, and thank you for the cake but I would have much preferred some Hohos. That smell was Vicks vapor rub by the way.
.....Perhaps, honey and princess. But I think most of us with intelligence above that of a turnip can tell the difference between the "pitiful ones" and the "aggressive hateful ones." I do usually have a little pity on the pitiful ones. But I have no qualms about throwing stones at the other ones.
Perhaps, honey and princess. But I think most of us with intelligence above that of a turnip can tell the difference between the "pitiful ones" and the "aggressive hateful ones." I do usually have a little pity on the pitiful ones. But I have no qualms about throwing stones at the other ones.