Case in point
Everyone's perspective is different on the topic. I look at cock size similar to boob size for ladies. To me big is big regardless of how they got there be it surgery, natural or whatever. If a dude with elephantitis posted a pic I am sure people would still cry foul saying it wasn't fair because it is a rare unusable, grotesque condition or whatnot.
Interesting irony, mj. Altho I honestly had no intention of making some guys defensive or insecure, it seems you'd be a case in point for the question I raise about natural girth. I'm sure you have your own perspective, but it's to be expected that guys who aren't naturally thick would raise the 'unfair' cry, so with all due respect there's really nothing unexpected in those responses/insights. I'm well aware that enhancements of all sorts can lead to new numbers and stats. I'm just more curious about what the range of perspectives might be from guys who are authentically thick, as well as what the upper percentiles of natural girth among LSPG men are.
As a side note, the elephantitis analogy lacks logic. First of all, elephantitis is not 'elective' (as are pumping, etc.). Secondly, yeah, if someone laid a claim to being 'thick' based on tumors or on edema, I suspect most folks would say that's a stretch for the general notion of 'thick.'
Anyway, back to the big cock banter...
