A curiosity was set ablaze by another poster and I want to hear from ladies that have a fetish for cops, cowboys, marines, army guys, construction workers, doctors, businessmen, firefighters, celebrities, athletes, coaches, etc. etc.
My question is: what is this fetish based on? Is it the uniform they wear? Is it the way the person looks, the way the person acts, simply what they do for a living, how good they are in bed or what?
==
I hear ladies from time to time say "Oh cops are the best fucks hands down" or "Yeah army guys are always really good in bed" etc. but I'm not sure this makes any sense to me.
I don't see how ones profession dictates being good in bed or anything really for that matter other than what you do for a living and are seemingly good at.
Is it not possible for a person to look good, have a good personality, be good in bed and not be one of aforementioned professions? I'd like to think it is possible lol. :tongue:
Also, isn't it possible for someone to not look good, have a bad personality, be bad in bed and be one of the aforementioned professions? I'm pretty sure that is possible as well.
The last two paragraphs seem pretty cut and dry to me.
==
It's also safe to say that all of the guys in these professions aren't going to be clones of each other who look, act, walk, talk, and perform in bed the same way. In fact, most of them are so different within the same profession it's like night and day.
A previous example I used: If you like "cops", is that the overweight one eating donuts all the time or the tall, dark, handsome, ripped muscular one on steroids with a huge cock?
I mean the fetish is just liking "cops" right... looks, personality, and bedroom skill is irrelevant, right? So that fat guy has a chance right? Right? Exactly.
Looks, personality, bedroom skill, etc. all has to be an important part in the mix somewhere. It's like even if the ladies are saying that stuff doesn't matter it really does. It has to, because no one wants someone who is ugly, smelly, a jerk, and bad in bed no matter what. You aren't going to overlook a bunch of bad in someone just because they work a profession that you have a fetish for.
==
I never realized that what men did for work could be a far greater turn on to women than the actual way they looked, acted, and performed in the bedroom.
I mean ladies don't get me wrong, I along with other men have a slight fetish for women that are nurses, teachers, aerobic instructors, dancers, etc.
But to say that I would be highly turned onto them simply because of what they did and not their looks, personality, and bedroom skills seems a little odd.
What they did for work would initially attract me to them, yes... but if they didn't have the look/personality/skill then it wouldn't really matter what their profession was.
Subsequently, if they had the look/personality/skill then it also wouldn't really matter what they did for work.
==
I was told implicitly that it was not just the costume or uniform that they wear! Seems to me that anyone could put on the costume and fool someone into thinking that they were of that profession. How would anyone know?
So if it is not the uniform, then what is it? I mean when you're both naked, does it really matter what your job is at that point?
Is there some gratification that comes from just knowing what they do for a living in the back of your head when you are both naked and having sex?
As far as I can gather that has to be it. But from a man's perspective I can't ever recall having sex with a girl and being more turned on in the back of my mind by what she did for a living rather than how she looked, acted, and performed in the moment.
Maybe I'm missing something, any incite is much appreciated. :tongue: