Three Ring Circus

B_Nick4444

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2007
Posts
6,849
Media
0
Likes
107
Points
193
Location
San Antonio, TX
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
dem·a·gogue

Function:noun

Etymology:Greek dēmagōgos, from dēmos people (perhaps akin to Greek daiesthai to divide) + agōgos leading, from agein to lead — more at tide, agentDate:1648

1 : a leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims and promises in order to gain power

2 : a leader championing the cause of the common people in ancient times

demagogue - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

In television advertisements last fall, Mr. Obama criticized his Republican rival for the presidency, Senator John McCain of Arizona, for proposing to tax all employer-provided health benefits. The benefits have long been tax-free, regardless of how generous they are or how much an employee earns. The advertisements did not point out that Mr. McCain, in exchange, wanted to give all families a tax credit to subsidize the purchase of coverage.
At the time, even some Obama supporters said privately that he might come to regret his position if he won the election; in effect, they said, he was potentially giving up an important option to help finance his ambitious health care agenda to reduce medical costs and to expand coverage to the 46 million uninsured Americans. Now that Mr. Obama has begun the health debate, several advisers say that while he will not propose changing the tax-free status of employee health benefits, neither will he oppose it if Congress does so.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/15/us/politics/15health.html?_r=1
 

D_Ireonsyd_Colonrinse

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Posts
1,511
Media
0
Likes
7
Points
123
Star! I can't believe you've STOOPED to using a legitimate news source like The New York Times!


p.s. What Obama is doing is: slowly deconstructing, dismantling the old broken America, bit by bit, piece by piece - the America that stopped working during the past 8 years! And quietly putting in it's place a brave new America! Where healthcare is a right - and unwinnable war monies are shifted from Iraq to rebuilding our failing roads and parks and schools! - where water is CLEAN and women have control over their own bodies and gays can openly serve their country in uniform AND "TELL"! - where everybody gladly pitches a little something into the center pot to help their fellow man who's fallen on hard times! - Yes, we can! - where we don't judge each other by skin color and the U.S. Constitution is a living, breathing document! Not hampered with an "originalist' interpretation like that damned Scalia seems to thinks! Si se puede! - A workable fusion of socialism and capitalism. Where government is seen as workable and not "evil"! And a slight redistribution of the wealth for the poor and oppressed and disenfranchised!

(I know this is idealistic, but I like this vision! --- This is where we all join hands and sing a socially-conscious Bob Dylan folk song with Joan Baez! -- for the times, they are a-changin'!)
 
Last edited:

Flashy

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Posts
7,901
Media
0
Likes
27
Points
183
Location
at home
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Star! I can't believe you've STOOPED to using a legitimate news source like The New York Times!

p.s. What Obama is doing is: slowly deconstructing, dismantling the old broken America, bit by bit, piece by piece - the America that stopped working during the past 8 years! And quietly putting in it's place a brave new America!

if he is dismantling the "old broken america", why does he still accept tens of millions, like all politicians do, from the companies and representatives of "old broken america"?

I have yet to see him place anything "brave and new" yet, unless you consider taxing and spending brave and new. the one chance he had to do something brave and new, and set a precedent, would have been to threaten to veto the pork-athon proposed by the democrat and republican earmark bandits...instead he caved in.

hardly any bravery in that one.

Where healthcare is a right - and unwinnable war monies are shifted from Iraq to rebuilding our failing roads and parks and schools! -

actually those unwinnable war monies are being shifted to Afghanistan along with more troops.


where water is CLEAN and women have control over their own bodies and gays can openly serve their country in uniform AND "TELL"! -

women had control over their own bodies for the last 8 years. Roe vs. Wade has not been overturned.

water at the moment is not exactly clean, and the republicans *AND* democrats have both presided over corporate polluters for decades without effecting any real change.

Gays cannot openly serve their country, and i have seen no indication that Obama will touch that 3rd rail yet, even though he has claimed in the past he will.

where everybody gladly pitches a little something into the center pot to help their fellow man who's fallen on hard times! -

how is it that "everybody gladly pitches a 'little something' into the center pot to 'help' their fellow man who has fallen on hard times, when in fact income taxes are being lowered on 95% of taxpayers? That does not sound like everybody is pitching in to me.

If he wants to pitch a little something in himself, why doesn't Obama symbolically pay himself only $1 a year instead of the roughly $400,000 a year he is getting paid?

he is already worth a couple million, so what is the difference? He'll make plenty when he is out of the office in speaking fees and books etc....look at the Clintons.

Yes, we can! - where we don't judge each other by skin color and the U.S. Constitution is a living, breathing document! Not hampered with an "originalist' interpretation like that damned Scalia seems to thinks! Si se puede! -

how do you not judge each other by skin color when that is the first thing you fill out on the things like censuses, job applications, college applications etc?



A workable fusion of socialism and capitalism.

indeed, but not collectivism.



Where government is seen as workable and not "evil"!

gee, i wonder where the thought of government as unworkable, evil and inefficient stems from :rolleyes:



And a slight redistribution of the wealth for the poor and oppressed and disenfranchised!

slight, huh? remind me about those poor and oppressed folks who are going to be paying higher energy prices because of the cap and trade system.

(I know this is idealistic, but I like this vision! --- This is where we all join hands and sing a socially-conscious Bob Dylan folk song with Joan Baez! -- for the times, they are a-changin'!)

yes...idealistic...Bob Dylan is now doing Victoria's Secret, Cadillac, Ipod, Pepsi commercials and Joan Baez

those who fought against the machine, are now shilling for it...times a changin indeed.
 

tripod

Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Posts
6,695
Media
14
Likes
1,927
Points
333
Location
USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
women had control over their own bodies for the last 8 years. Roe vs. Wade has not been overturned.

There were some serious attempts to limit abortions during the Bush administration. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act passed in 2003 was supposed to ignite the country's "pro-life bones" and the evangelicals were hoping that Roe v. Wade was to be overturned with Bush's loaded Supreme court. Their theatrics were apparently not enough to sway the average American's opinion that abortion be kept legal. They almost made it.

water at the moment is not exactly clean, and the republicans *AND* democrats have both presided over corporate polluters for decades without effecting any real change.

President George W. Bush froze a Clinton-era proposal to lower the legal maximum of arsenic in our drinking water from 50 parts per billion to 5 ppb.

and...

on 3-20-2001 Bush withdraws new arsenic in drinking water standard.
then on 5-22-2001 Bush formally suspends arsenic in drinking water protections.

the EPA then issued an arsenic in-tap water standards HIGHER then that recommended by health and safety advocates on 10-13-2001

then on 7-12-2003 the EPA quietly backs off on reducing drinking water pollution. There is more, I'll post it if you want...


Gays cannot openly serve their country, and i have seen no indication that Obama will touch that 3rd rail yet, even though he has claimed in the past he will.

He has made indications that he will. He is presently consulting his military advisers on the subject and most likely move in 2010 on the matter.

slight, huh? remind me about those poor and oppressed folks who are going to be paying higher energy prices because of the cap and trade system.

Using dirty energy is just wrong and we have been participating in that endeavor for far too long. Obama's cap and trade system raises a bunch of money that can be returned to consumers to offset the effect of higher energy costs.

What would you propose to do Flashy? Nothing? A carbon tax?

yes...idealistic...Bob Dylan is now doing Victoria's Secret, Cadillac, Ipod, Pepsi commercials and Joan Baez

those who fought against the machine, are now shilling for it...times a changin indeed.

Dylan probably rides in a Cadillac, uses an iPod, drinks Pepsi and fucks Carolyn while she is wearin' Victoria Secret lingerie. Should he NOT make commercials about things that he uses or has a use for?

Apple, Cadillac, Peps and VS never dropped any bombs on people.

And when did Dylan ever rail against cars? Name the Bob Dylan song where he trashes Victoria's Secret... when has Dylan sang against Pepsi?

Corporations in and of themselves are not the problem.

Dylan's "Masters of War" is still completely intact and is as relevant today as it was when the song was written.
 

Flashy

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Posts
7,901
Media
0
Likes
27
Points
183
Location
at home
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Roe vs Wade was not overturned, as i said, your hysterics not withstanding.

President George W. Bush froze a Clinton-era proposal to lower the legal maximum of arsenic in our drinking water from 50 parts per billion to 5 ppb.
we all know the republicans hate clean water, strangely they are joined by plenty of democrats in that endeavor.

In 2008 election cycle, the PACs of the Top 10 worst water polluters gave almost equally to Republicans & Democrats, who gladly accepted.

According to Waterkeepers (2005 worst 10)

1. AK Steel Corp
single largest reported discharger of toxics to water nationwide. discharged an astonishing 29,680,083 pounds of toxins to the Ohio River.

Contributions to federal candidates - $73,550

Democrats 25% - $18,250
Republicans 75% - $45,300

--

2. BASF Corp
Their Freeport, Texas, chemical plant is the second largest reported discharger of toxins to surface water in the U.S., releasing 15,945,553 pounds of contaminates into the Clute Lake Jackson Drainage Channel and the Brazos River. The German-based chemical company reported discharging toxins to 11 different waterbodies in eight states.


Contributions to federal candidates - [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]$301,000[/FONT]


Democrats 36% - $109,000
Republicans 64% - $192,000


--


3. Cargill
and their subsidiaries are a triple threat—high number (11) of facilities discharging toxins, high number (10) of waterbodies polluted, and total pounds (almost 12 million) of toxins discharged.


Contributions to federal candidates - [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]$147,000[/FONT]


Democrats - 33% - $49,000
Republicans - 67% - $98,000

--


4. Dow Chemical
and their subsidiaries discharge a whopping 97 different toxins to 16 different U.S. waterbodies, including a total of 606 pounds of the incredibly dangerous, dioxin. There is no known safe exposure limit to dioxin and it bioaccumulates



Contributions to federal candidates - $294,500


Democrats - 44% - $130,000
Republicans - 56% - $164,500




5. DuPont
continues to discharge PCBs to the Delaware River, even though this highly toxic substance is banned. In addition, Du Pont, in conjunction with the U.S. Army, is planning to discharge VXH, a form of caustic nerve gas, into the Delaware River

Contributions to federal candidates - [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]$217,100[/FONT]


Democrats - 36% - $79,100
Republicans - 64% - $138,000


--


6. ExxonMobil
continues to poison our waterbodies with mercury, a neurotoxin, and MTBE, a potential human carcinogen. This petroleum powerhouse weighs in with 25 facilities releasing 47 different kinds of toxins into 25 different U.S. waterbodies.

Contributions to federal candidates - [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]$721,998[/FONT]


Democrats 11% - $78,000
Republicans 89% - $643,998

--

7. General Electric
is notorious for their legacy of PCB contamination of the upper Hudson River. They've spent millions on a campaign to avoid cleaning up this mess. They lead the pack with the largest number of facilities discharging toxins to surface water.

Contributions to federal candidates [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]$1,386,300[/FONT]



Democrats 52% - $719,350
Republicans 48% - $666,950




8. MOnsanto
continue their horrifying tradition as the manufacturer of Agent Orange and now banned PCBs, producing herbicides and pesticides that contaminate water all over the U.S. and the world. Not only are their products dangerous, they take top dishonors for discharging the largest variety of toxins (97) to our waterways.

Contributions to federal candidates [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]$186,250[/FONT]


Democrats - 42% - $78,500
Republicans - 58% - $107,750


9. Tyson Foods
Tyson's 23 facilities discharge toxins to 24 different waterbodies. The largest chicken producer in the U.S. and largest supplier of beef likes to keep it big—including the 18,424,001 pounds of toxins they discharged to U.S. waters in 2002.

Contributions to federal candidates [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]$164,159[/FONT]


Democrats - 60% - $98,659
Republicans - 40% - $63,000



10. US Steel
dischages more than 20 heavy metals and other toxins to nine waterbodies in Alabama, California, Indiana, and Pennsylvania. Their Gary, Indiana, steel works alone pumps out 2,970,499 pounds of arsenic, chromium, cyanide, lead, mercury and 18 other toxins into Lake Michigan and three other surrounding waterbodies.

Contributions to federal candidates [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]$228,377[/FONT]


Democrats 64% - $145,627
Republicans 36% - $82,750




---


TOTAL Contributions to federal candidates - $3,720,234

Democrats - $1,517,986 - 40.80 %
Republicans - $2,202,248 - 59.19%



60-40 does not look too much like good guy/bad guy especially since the difference came from Exxon/Mobil who overwhelmingly support Republicans.

subtract the glaring Exxon Mobil, & it's a rather even race to see who can help pollute the waters.

TOTAL Contributions to federal candidates without ExxonMobil - [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]$2,998,236[/FONT]

Democrats - $1,439,980 - 48.02%
Republicans -$1,558,256 - 51.98%




He has made indications that he will. He is presently consulting his military advisers on the subject and most likely move in 2010 on the matter.
I have made indications that i will pay my sister the $10 i owed her from a very controversial and contested bet i lost back in 1992. I have been consulting my financial and legal advisers on the subject and i most likely will not move ever on the matter.


He is not moving anywhere while US Combat forces are involved in Iraq and Afghanistan.


Using dirty energy is just wrong and we have been participating in that endeavor for far too long. Obama's cap and trade system raises a bunch of money that can be returned to consumers to offset the effect of higher energy costs.

What would you propose to do Flashy? Nothing? A carbon tax?
Well guess what? dirty energy has been used ever since we discovered oil & coal as sources & will still be used for decades to come. There is no alternative system in place yet to absorb the energy needs of this country if we were to stop using fossil fuels tomorrow.

Obviously you do not seem to realize, that the money is not going to be "returned" to the consumer, since the companies will simply pass along their added cost *to* the consumer.



Dylan probably rides in a Cadillac, uses an iPod, drinks Pepsi and fucks Carolyn while she is wearin' Victoria Secret lingerie. Should he NOT make commercials about things that he uses or has a use for?
yes, i am sure he uses those things and his altruism leads him to make those commercials.


Apple, Cadillac, Peps and VS never dropped any bombs on people.
oh is that right?


-Cadillac is a brand owned by General Motors. They made the Hummer, for the army. I have a feeling that Hummers in war zones with machine guns on top have killed a few folks, no?

GM Defense was formed in 1950. GM Land Systems eventually wound up owned by General Dynamics

GM produced the Stryker armored fighting vehicle, seen blazing away at in Iraq and Afghanistan.

GM Also owned Hughes Aircraft, and bought the missile systems business from General Dynamics.

GM/Hughes also produced the AH64 Apache helicopter



-Apple Computer is a large air polluter, in fact it had a rather nasty run-in with the City of Sacramento about it.

Its software and computers are involved in many levels of the US Military both in weapons design and application like the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division China Lake

There are over 20,000 Apple Computers in the US Military, from operations to weapon design.



-Pepsi - I am shocked that a conspiracy nut like you does not know about the Pepsi/Kendall, Nixon, Rumsfeld connection...strange that Dylan would shill for them considering how he undoubtedly feels about characters such as Nixon and Rumsfeld

-Victoria's Secret lingerie is made in sweatshops overseas.

Jonathan Tasini: Victoria's Secret, Slave Labor And So-Called "Free Trade"

And when did Dylan ever rail against cars? Name the Bob Dylan song where he trashes Victoria's Secret... when has Dylan sang against Pepsi?

Corporations in and of themselves are not the problem.
strange, i guess it is just what corporations *DO* that is the problem.

Dylan's "Masters of War" is still completely intact and is as relevant today as it was when the song was written
indeed it is...so strange that he would shill for a car company with their past and present neck deep in the military industrial complex you and Dylan so decry


Come you masters of war
You that build the big guns (GM)
You that build the death planes (Hughes Aerospace owned by GM)
You that build all the bombs (GD Missile systems, owned by Hughes/GM)


-

Like Judas of old
You lie and deceive
A world war can be won
You want me to believe (RUMSFELD, who also shilled for Pepsi)


-


Let me ask you one question
Is your money that good
Will it buy you forgiveness

Do you think that it could
I think you will find
When your death takes its toll
All the money you made
Will never buy back your soul (Tell that to the sweatshop workers making VS Bras)




-


spare me your continued partisan bullshit.

you blame the republicans for every ill, the entire time deifying your corrupt masters as virtuous. they are all the same

you are as bad as they are.
 

tripod

Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Posts
6,695
Media
14
Likes
1,927
Points
333
Location
USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
we all know the republicans hate clean water, strangely they are joined by plenty of democrats in that endeavor.

In 2008 election cycle, the PACs of the Top 10 worst water polluters gave almost equally to Republicans & Democrats, who gladly accepted.

Yes... you'd take the fucking money too if they offered to you. The difference is the fact that Democrats don't fucking bend over backwards to ruin the goddamn drinking water and the environment.

He is not moving anywhere while US Combat forces are involved in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Well, a continued occupation and war effort would make enacting big changes difficult of darn near impossible. It's most likely the reality though.

Well guess what? dirty energy has been used ever since we discovered oil & coal as sources & will still be used for decades to come. There is no alternative system in place yet to absorb the energy needs of this country if we were to stop using fossil fuels tomorrow.

Well, there has been intense opposition to alternative energies over the years and most of it has come from the right. When do we start to ween ourselves off of the oil tit? Next year? In two years? How about now?

Obviously you do not seem to realize, that the money is not going to be "returned" to the consumer, since the companies will simply pass along their added cost *to* the consumer.

Obama could then issue tax credits to consumers and use the revenue from the cap and trade policies if the energy companies pass the cost along, which they shouldn't.

Oh... and fuck Bob Dylan!!!! Thanx for taking the time to school me on what a hypocrite he is being with those commercials.

The thing is... he was never really a member of the left...he sings folk music, but he's no fucking Pete Seeger. I was giving him the benefit of the doubt, I just had a romanticized vision of the man... it was false, you are right.

you blame the republicans for every ill, the entire time deifying your corrupt masters as virtuous. they are all the same

you are as bad as they are.

First off, I don't have "masters", there are some people in the public that I respect and that is as far as it goes. I don't blame the republicans for every ill... that is complete exaggeration. I don't think that the Republicans have been held accountable for their misdeeds though. You obviously don't know that I can't stand the Clintons and think that they made some ridiculous moves during their term. I am however a big fan of Carter even though he is human and makes mistakes like everyone else.

The truth is that the Democrats are pikers when it comes to corruption and evil when compared to the Republicans. I'm not as critical of them because they are not as corrupt and evil.

Your nihilistic view of the world is not productive nor is it to be desired. I mean, nobody wants to live in fantasy land, but we shouldn't be cynical to the extreme should we?