To say.

[Mercurygirl]

Would you ever just say out loud to him during sex that his dick is small? Or even just tell him outside the bedroom. Whether it be ONS, BF, FWB, Fiance, Husband, w/e.
YES/NO & WHY?

No.

Why? I simply take no pleasure in the degradation of others over such rudimentary matters.

 

[Doranq]

No.

Why? I simply take no pleasure in the degradation of others over such rudimentary matters.

Would you not ever say it in a positive manner or is there no positive to you?

 

[Mercurygirl]

Would you not ever say it in a positive manner or is there no positive to you?

On what planet would that be considered a positive?

 

[693987]

I'm fairly sure OP is just waiting for women to say that small penises are terrible and the worst. That small penises mean we wouldn't ever date/fuck/whatever someone, etc.

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

I don't think most guys know where they stand on size. Especially if they never played sports, they are 100% straight or dont even watch porn. My husband had no clue he was larger than average. He just presumed every guy struggled upon entering a woman. He admitted to not being able to finding a comfortable condom and figured there wasn't much variety out there as far as condom size goes.

I've been with small guys and they never mentioned their size one way or another. I sure as heck didn't. I didn't have a problem with their size.

I've had several very average guys proclaim to be large. They especially believed they were large once they experienced difficulties entering me. I'm sure they've gone on to brag even more so.

Would I tell a guy he is smaller than average? No. Why? Because like Fade I don't want to be cruel. It's like telling a smaller chested woman she has no boobs as soon as she gets naked to have sex with you. It's insulting and likely to embarrass the other person.

Don't insult a person while they are naked.

 

[Doranq]

On what planet would that be considered a positive?

Just because you view it that way doesn't mean others don't. There are others who are not going to see it as such a bad thing. People are different and have their own views and preferences.

I'm fairly sure OP is just waiting for women to say that small penises are terrible and the worst. That small penises mean we wouldn't ever date/fuck/whatever someone, etc.

What in my post history would suggest that I would be after that? I've commented on the social aspects of dicks and how there is no best and how women don't all like or want the same thing almost everytime I have broached the subject. All in all the overwhelming majority of my posts have not been around dicks. So do tell, how does one arrive to THAT conclusion based on my past history? To me it seems like quite an ignorant comment.

 

[693987]

What in my post history would suggest that I would be after that? I've commented on the social aspects of dicks and how there is no best and how women don't all like or want the same thing almost everytime I have broached the subject. All in all the overwhelming majority of my posts have not been around dicks. So do tell, how does one arrive to THAT conclusion based on my past history? To me it seems like quite an ignorant comment.

Oh, so just you get to try and read more into things, no one else? Your focus on my use of the word cruel a whole two times when the second time was a summary of that entire post, and your repeatedly trying to seemingly angle for a specific kind of answer in this thread are acceptable though? Okay.

I don't make a habit of looking at the typically extensive post history of people. I interact with a heck of a lot of people. Unless it's someone extremely unique, usernames/users are kind of whatever to me. Good, bad, whatever, it is what it is. I'm going off the posts you've made in this thread.

 

[Doranq]

Oh, so just you get to try and read more into things, no one else? Your focus on my use of the word cruel a whole two times when the second time was a summary of that entire post, and your repeatedly trying to seemingly angle for a specific kind of answer in this thread are acceptable though? Okay.

I don't make a habit of looking at the typically extensive post history of people. I interact with a heck of a lot of people. Unless it's someone extremely unique, usernames/users are kind of whatever to me. Good, bad, whatever, it is what it is. I'm going off the posts you've made in this thread.

Eh, it isn't the same by a long stretch.

I asked you what you meant. I was basically like 'hey, you said this and I found your wording to be a lil off, I kind of makes me think this, is that true?" To which we had a misunderstanding on A what you said, and B my question about what you said to then C where you elaborated and thus cleared the confusion. Thus I didn't press it further as there was no need to, I was wrong which I had an open mind to.

Do you see the difference? I asked you if what I thought was correct while letting you know that I could very well have the wrong idea, which indeed was possible and lo and behold I did. Did you do any of that in return? no.

Your response on the other hand isn't like that at all.

Perhaps you should make it a habit. I take this in account for a large number of frequent posters here and many other sites when I read and respond to their posts. Whether it be previous interactions or previous posts I have read. It gives more context and allows one to understand where the other person is coming from.

Of course I'm looking for specific answers. Why would I ask a question hoping to get random answers? That is entirely silly. Also based on all of my previous questions, you ( the majority of you) do not appreciate really long questions or lots of them in a single post. So I gave a very very very simplified and toned down question to a more complicated issue. However like I said to mercury which still holds true, the question in of itself is a neutral question. What I am interested in is the +/- feelings of the respondents and why. If they simply don't like small ones, cool w/e doesn't interest me in the slightest. If they do or just feel neutral yet still show negative feelings as TG did for ex(great/best post thus far), now within THAT is more in line of what I am interested in.

We have a person that has neutral or positive feelings towards small dicks as a trait in of itself. However has negative views when it comes to the word or similar to small when being said to another person. That there is what I'm after. No, i'm not after the why... you don't read names but to sum it up, I've made several posts that Extensively covers the why. It is the disconnect and their thought on it that I'm interested in to put it simply to where I was hoping to engage in.

 

[TinyPrincess]

It is extremely obvious what you or he could gain. Idk why this is something that could possibly need explaining at all or would be a question
.

I must be daft then. I can't guess what I gain from it? Or him?

I might miss the point entirely. It might be extremely obvious - I just don't get it.

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

Jesus christ doranq's, why are you mincing words like this. You sound so uptight and rigid in your thinking.

No one should have to explain what they meant 5 times to you in order for you to respectfully disagree. You sound like an amped up lawyer in the court room.

 

[Doranq]

Jesus christ doranq's, why are you mincing words like this. You sound so uptight and rigid in your thinking.

No one should have to explain what they meant 5 times to you in order for you to respectfully disagree. You sound like an amped up lawyer in the court room.

Gross Exaggeration much?

I lay it out as so.

1 Fade says stuff, I see stuff, I' m like hey you said this and that, does it mean this? I could be wrong. She answers a different question, then I'm like hey that wasn't my question, she ask what was, I say. She then answers my original question END No disagreement. (The only instance of reading into something)

2 AlteredEgo says some stuff. I ask something, she answers. End. No disagreement

3 Nailz said no, I asked why, End no response. No disagreement

4 Tiny says some stuff. She asks why, I say, why, She says some stuff and says why. I say why, She says she doesn't get what i'm saying, End what the misunderstanding is idk, she doesn't know, End.

5 Mercury says some stuff, I ask if you'd say this. She says something I don't agree with. I say what i think. END There is Disagreement 1. 1to comments

5 Fade says something in a slanderous manner, I ask her why would she say that and based of what given my history. She says why and how I did the same thing. I respond to saying how I didn't and what my obj is. There is Disagreement 2. 2 to 2 comments.

So again exaggeration on your part. It paints an inaccurate picture of what happened within the thread. Why the dishonesty?

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

Tl;dr

 

[TinyPrincess]

4 Tiny says some stuff. She asks why, I say, why, She says some stuff and says why. I say why, She says she doesn't get what i'm saying, End what the misunderstanding is idk, she doesn't know, End.

I know what the misunderstanding is - you haven't explained the extremely obvious.

You say it's extremely obvious, so why can't you just very, very simply explain it to me as I'm apparently too daft to read your mind.

 

[693987]

5 Fade says something in a slanderous manner, I ask her why would she say that and based of what given my history. She says why and how I did the same thing. I respond to saying how I didn't and what my obj is. There is Disagreement 2. 2 to 2 comments.

Slanderous? I think in spite of your rather lengthy posts you may need to look up what slander is.

http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1969

If you're too lazy to click, slander is "oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another, which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed"

Further, the post you're complaining about and saying I "slandered" you, I specifically said "I'm fairly sure". It was "I", as in my opinion and "fairly sure" as in there being plenty of room for deviation and inaccuracy. I didn't state it as fact.

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

Do you plan on holding Fade legally accountable for slandering you?

 

[Doranq]

Tl;dr

Let me shorten that down for you - Nu-uh. Should be perfect for your reading level

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

Do you ever think that people who have a short attention span don't want to sit there a read a thesis? Especially when it's a circular argument?

 

[Doranq]

Do you ever think that people who have a short attention span don't want to sit there a read a thesis? Especially when it's a circular argument?

ofc not, if you acknowledged it you would be proven wrong. So yes ofc you have a short attention span it is in your best interest to.

Ttop yapping at me and grade my damn thesis already, my mom wants that shiny A+ and star on her fridge.

(oh wait wuuuut using a word outside of its normal intended use, say whaaaaaaaa, now where have I seen that before hmmmmmmmmm.)

Also @Fade
go watch Game of Thrones or something. You can say and do plenty of shit without saying it outright. Also plz continue to conveniently ignore all other points

 

[693987]

Your point that you had a bias while reading my post, which I clarified and was resolved? Great. Your point that your posts in this thread show a bias, and I was noting it? Not so great. There's still no clarification on that, because as myself and TinyPrincess and Tattooed Goddess have noted, there's some lack of clarity and there seems to be a bias in posts made in this thread.

Further, as far as post history? Great, fabulous, people's opinions can change. People can mostly behave one way, and then underlying things suddenly become apparent from something else they do. I stand by my "I'm fairly sure". My opinion, which others have been agreeing with, is that this thread is seeming to demonstrate a desire for a particular kind of answer.

It's not rocket science. Are you going to go tell me to go get an aerospace degree now?

 

[EllieP]

I always feel like the plain yogurt representative here. I've never been with anyone with a definite kinky side.

And I've only ever commented on the size of one weenie, and that was because I was uncomfortable and explained the reason why. I married him, by the way, so it's all good.

Also, I've never been with a man with what I consider a small weenie. I don't think I'd do well with someone with a self-defacing personality. I'm kind of the cheerleader. "Noooo, it's not small. It's compact! Look, see, it fits right there just perfectly. Of course, you're going deep enough. Ungh ungh ungh, see?"