BigJohn9x8 said:There's a guy in Dublin called "Bray" on Men4Sexnow.com who uses Tristan's measurement photo as his! I messaged him for more photos. No response. Attitude from a phoney! I knew it wasn't his cock because he describes himself as "cut", which Tristan obviously is not.
I have seen other stolen photos on Men4sexnow, but don't care. I just want the photos.
jeff black said:
pony3000 said:
buffbaldy said:Now that is a nice piece!
nouveau said:You want over the top? Well I was set a challenge, and this is the 'best' I could do (so far, lmao).
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v105/Rykan/EditedCock3Enormous.jpg
BigJohn9x8 said:FAKE ?!!! I examined Tristan's measurement photo at extreme enlargement and I could not detect any phoniness at the 23 cm. area, or elsewhere.
Here is a similar measurement photo which is located in a few places around the internet. On one site the words "old trick" was included, but I think it is genuine, not morphed.
What do you think?
Ahah!!novice_btm said:Before the questions start (asking Dr, or someone else to prove it), to illustrate Dr's point, see the attached (resized to comply with message attachment restrictions). Again, I just notice patterns, and the use of the "cloning tool", so others can get into the other problems.
On the right, the areas enclosed are a pixel-for-pixel match. On the left the 2 arrow-like dark lines, then the solid straight line above them, along with the dark spot, highlighted by the crescents, are identical. The only "clever" part about it is that they been cloned, or pasted, in at an angle, so the matches aren't as obvious, also producing the "bend".