Trojans for Asians

marriedasian

Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2008
Posts
1,580
Media
1
Likes
2,032
Points
343
Location
Wisconsin (United States)
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
Statistically, asians do have smaller penises but it's not absolute. Kinda like saying all black guys are hung when in fact there are many who are just average in size.

I didn't take offense to the commercial, i personally thought it was kinda dumb and a waste of time to watch it. At least make the commercial interesting or more to watch than two hands, a box, and some hand gestures.

There are plenty of women out there who prefer asian men from all walks of life and ethnicity.
 

jerrya1066

Just Browsing
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Posts
6
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
86
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Ken Jeong did more to perpetuate that stereotype in The Hangover than this spoofmercial every could. Brave man. Small willy.
 

D_Kirkhaus Komandohanger

Just Browsing
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Posts
74
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
151
If it's okay to acknowledge this racial difference (in averages, mind you) then it should be okay to acknowledge other racial differences. In other words, this particular average works against Asians (among heterosexuals at least). Their higher average I.Q. works for them (speaking of Northeast Asians here).

You must have completely missed the part of his post that addresses this directly.
While penis size is most certainly quantifiable (just get a ruler), intelligence is much more tricky (and controversial). Vast amounts of Neuroscientists and Psychologists (people that have studied this their entire professional careers) can't even come into agreement on what exactly intelligence even is, let alone if there is any way to accurately measure it for comparison and statistical purposes in addition to creating a culturally bias-free method to attain these figures.
And while we're on that subject, go find a bunch of biologists (geneticists specifically) that can even agree on what the hell "race" even entails. The majority of traits that are associated with race to the laymen (skin color, eye shape, hair texture) are actually regional phenotypic characteristics that have very little to do with the underlying genotypes of many populations. While these characteristics are easily recognizable on the surface level they carry next to no medical relevance and thus mean jack shit when it comes to any actual biological classifications.

There are ways of grouping certain populations together that have certain common ancestral lines, but really, if one goes back far enough in human genetic history everyone on the entire planet has one ancestor in common. (Google the terms "Mitochondrial Eve" and "Y-Chromosomal Adam")
What it basically comes down to is that you're drawing a comparison of groups by attempting to find a correlation between two variables that aren't even properly defined through any sort of scientific consensus.
Really, most differences between peoples on the planet are much easily attributed to the variations in human culture and the effects of the environment in shaping the many methods of survival depending on available resources rather then underlying "racial genetics".
 

whatadork

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Posts
68
Media
0
Likes
5
Points
93
Location
southern california
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
"Hehe, this commerical makes fun of the stereotype of Asians having small dicks!" is racial humor.

"Hehe. Look Asians have dicks so small, they have to change commercials in Asia. This is a real commercial and look how small their dicks probably are! I like this commercial because it makes me feel superior because I'm not Asian therefore my dick is bigger (and thus superior) to Asians!" is racism.

What started out as the first one quickly evolved into #2.

Sigh. This is why racial humor is a sensitive subject. Some people understand the joke. A lot of people DON'T but laugh anyways because they enjoy the racist aspects.