...you can bet that Miss PhD knew you were gunning for her job so she wanted you out. Oh the things I've learned working in the corporate world!
That's what I thought, too, but the company spun it the other way: I was gunning for her job, and I wanted her out. You see, before she even came along they knew I wanted a promotion and was working hard to get it, so I didn't hide my surprise or disappointment when they told me that they were putting her in charge of the project for which I'd already been functioning unofficially as the "acting" project director for several months. I wasn't unprofessional about it; I didn't get angry or upset or rude. I simply expressed my interest in taking on new challenges and my confidence in my ability to do more for the company. My supervisor agreed with me, apparently sincerely, and assured me the situation was temporary until we could get her trained and hire new staff. (Later I was told that they simply couldn't afford to move me, since I had been on the project longer than anyone else, and I knew all the details of the project better than anyone else. Ironically, Miss PhD never took advantage of my knowledge and experience on the project. Instead, she seemed very determined to do everything differently, and almost always went against my recommendations. But it was still my fault when things went wrong.)
Anyway, the point I'm leading up to is this: Did I resent her for getting the position I wanted, and which I believed I had earned? Hell, yes. Did I try to undermine her or sabotage her, perhaps even unconsciously? Absolutely not. I knew it wasn't her fault that she was hired into the position that I wanted, so I did my best to hide my resentment, to treat her with nothing but respect, and to be as helpful and supportive of her as I could. I bent over backwards to please her. I got nothing but criticism in return. The harder I tried, the more displeased she became, and the more "mistakes" she found. Honestly, I didn't know what to do.
Also, whatever issues I had with her, I was determined not to let affect the project--that project is my baby, and I pride myself on the quality and integrity of my work and the service I provide to the client and customers.
But nothing worked, then she got me bumped from a conference that I'd been preparing for months. I went to HR. At that point, I felt I had nothing to lose.
Of course, she had already been to them about me. They told me that they believed that the problem was that I had trouble working under a woman and that I was "playing games," perhaps unconsciously (they gave me the benefit of the doubt there), in an effort to undermine her.
For those of you who don't know me, the attitude they accused me of having goes against my most deeply held beliefs and values. I was so insulted I almost quit right then and there. (In my heart, I did quit.) I fought my desire to storm out and never come back...and I have regretted it ever since.
The bitch of it is, their version of the story is completely plausible. People are passed over for promotions all the time, sometimes with good reason, and they don't always like or get along with the new boss. Regardless of whether or not the new boss is competent, a resentful employee can exhibit all sorts of passive-aggressive behaviors. I knew that I wasn't letting my resentfulness get the better of me, but how could I prove that? I couldn't. But it really bothered me (and still does) that after three great years at the company, they didn't know me better than that. Prior to that time, I got along really well with my colleagues, and I thought I had earned their trust and respect. Did no one realize what was really going on? Did no one think, "Meniscus has been doing a great job for years, and the project ran smoothly for several months under his direction, so Meniscus's evaluation of the situation is probably correct, and the recent failures on this project are most likely due to Miss PhD's lack of leadership, poor interpersonal skills, micromanagement, etc., etc."
From what I've heard since then, corporate psychology doesn't work that way. If there's an issue between a supervisor and a subordinate, the company's default position is to take the supervisor's side, and to place the burden on the subordinate to adapt to his superiors, no matter how unreasonable they are.
Looking back on it, part of me still can't believe it. It's just so wrong.
You have my profound sympathies Meniscus.
Thank you, jason. Even though this all happened years ago, it's nice to have someone hear my side, and understand where I'm coming from.