True about Muslim populations?

Status
Not open for further replies.

B_talltpaguy

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Posts
2,331
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
123
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Putting ADMIN in caps isn't going to get procedure followed any quicker than it is already... The fact that I ventured into politics should be evidence enough that the thread is being discussed.
Just so folks know, I was kinda being sarcastic and playing off of Max's usual busy-body-ness. If you look at my posts, I generally don't cap things... But Max does. :biggrin1:
 

B_New End

Experimental Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2007
Posts
2,970
Media
0
Likes
20
Points
183
Location
WA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Luckily, I've not heard of any mass killings of people because they're druids since Anglesey 61 AD.

You can ask the Jews of Europe from ca. 1100 AD to ca. 1945 AD.
You can ask the muslims how they felt about the crusades.

Christianity is numerically probably the most persecuted in the world, with tens of thousands of deaths in Africa, the Middle East & Asia suggested annually.
That's because the bombing of muslims by rabid right wing controlled christian or Jewish nations doesn't count. Because dead Muslims are not persecuted victims, like the hapless Christians, they are simply collateral damage. Fuck them ragheads anyway, we should turn the whole middle east into a sea of glass.

Well fuck, if Focus on the Family's Dr. James Dobson says so. :rolleyes: I'll read what he has to say once the radical left's homosexual agenda has turned America 50% gay.
 
Last edited:

Drifterwood

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Posts
18,677
Media
0
Likes
2,811
Points
333
Location
Greece
A gay man abuses a minor. All gay men are paedophiles.

A black man rapes a white woman. All blacks want to fuck your white wife.

A muslim attacks his perceived oppressor. All muslims are radicalised terrorists.

A white man shoots a politician, a judge, a child and six other people. All white men must have the right to be armed to the teeth.
 

nudeyorker

Admired Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Posts
22,744
Media
0
Likes
778
Points
208
Location
NYC/Honolulu
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
A gay man abuses a minor. All gay men are paedophiles.

A black man rapes a white woman. All blacks want to fuck your white wife.

A muslim attacks his perceived oppressor. All muslims are radicalised terrorists.

A white man shoots a politician, a judge, a child and six other people. All white men must have the right to be armed to the teeth.

Thank you for posting this; some incarnation or other has been posted in this forum many times, but the people for whom it is intended I can only surmise are busy in a bar, church or massage parlor.
Keeping my fingers crossed this time.
 

B_crackoff

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Posts
1,726
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
73
A gay man abuses a minor. All gay men are paedophiles.

A black man rapes a white woman. All blacks want to fuck your white wife.

A muslim attacks his perceived oppressor. All muslims are radicalised terrorists.

A white man shoots a politician, a judge, a child and six other people. All white men must have the right to be armed to the teeth.

Yeah - again a source for this. DW - that's frankly a bit racist - any opinion polls or surveys to back up a single one of these stereotypical preconceptions. It's all a bit passe student yoof speak circa 1980 trying to inveigle yourself with the hot Socialist Worker chick!

More like Black man rapes a white woman - DW stereotypes all white people as thinking that all black men are rapists.

How about - BNP leader makes comments about Muslim gangs predating on only young white girls in 2004 - all BNP supporters are violent racists.

A few hundred Catholic priests are found to have buggered their altar boys over the last 40 years - all Catholic priests are paedophiles.

A violent arab illegal immigrant muslim rapes a woman, gets sent to jail, commits more offences, gets sent to jail, then doesn't get deported 'cause he knocked up a woman.

Oh wait - all of that is what happened.:cool: How tolerant are we! In practice, your statement is probably the inverse to what happens in fact - in the UK at least.

It cuts both ways - everyone & everyside can find meaningless ad hominem ammunition in order to make lazy points.
 
Last edited:

B_VinylBoy

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,363
Media
0
Likes
68
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
When Muslims are criticized for their actions, it's considered "truth".
When Christians are criticized for theirs, it's called "persecution".
Oy vey. :rolleyes:

I'm really starting to wonder if my parents made a mistake getting me baptized when I was a child.
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
Just so folks know, I was kinda being sarcastic and playing off of Max's usual busy-body-ness. If you look at my posts, I generally don't cap things... But Max does. :biggrin1:
Excuse me? What the hell are you on about, Mr. "Let me tell you how I run things at my site"?
I'll thank you to leave me out of your obsequious displays. Grow up.

Irony wasted on crackoff :rolleyes:
Amazing, ain't it?

It seems to be catching.
Or just endemic.
 
Last edited:

B_crackoff

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Posts
1,726
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
73
Irony wasted on crackoff :rolleyes:

BLOODY HELL, I'm dealing with people who really need to go to bed, or eat some oily fish!

The fact I juxtaposed an inverse example of dear ole DWs post (which is quite a hackneyed, & much overused, paraphrased example of turning alleged bigotry upon itself in an attempt to turn the mirror on the bigot), should surely have given a clue that I knew exactly what he was saying.

Then reversed the viewpoint from right to left.

The racial stereotyping was of the preconceived holder of the bigoted views - probably of Joe White - not the views themselves.

That's what made it bigoted. Making bigoted statements in order to ad hominem stereotype & attack others, without the slightest shred of evidence that anyone, anywhere thinks that way.

It's not irony - it's a stereotypical characterisation of others whose beliefs aren't the same as yours, & tres passe -I've been hearing pseudo guff like that since I was 5!

I think most of you won't even understand that, although I feel certain DW will, though he won't agree with it.

Irony lost - where? -hahhaha - it's like trying to explain to children at times.:biggrin1: No intellectual stimulus here.
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
^ Still missing the essential point, and instead casting it as a left vs. right equation. Amazing.

Many pots; calling many kettles black.
Racist! (j/k) Anyway, you have to hang around here awhile to distinguish the pots from the kettles.
They're not all equally black, on either side.

Is it time for your bottle?

Anyway, I just happened to notice a recent post of yours, and it reminded me of how, as some sort of weird backtracking deflection from you calling out the mods, you out-of-the-blue took me to task for capitalizing, of all things. FWIW, in the absence of vocal inflections in typing, I occasionally CAPITALIZE, italicize, underline, bold, or even highlight certain words for emphasis, as many posters do. Why this is a problem for you or what relevance it has to anything completely escapes me. I'm also perplexed by your reference to "busy-body-ness", whatever the hell that means, not that I really care to have you explain.

To refresh:
Just so folks know, I was kinda being sarcastic and playing off of Max's usual busy-body-ness. If you look at my posts, I generally don't cap things... But Max does. :biggrin1:
No, you would never stoop so low as to capitalize:
On sites I run, if a thread started off with this, the thread would be deleted on sight, and depending on how many adverse actions the offending member had before (as well as his status as a member), he would either get a private verbal warning, a forum-wide suspension, banned from the politiforum, or banned from the site all together.

If it was a post, it would be soft deleted and the same discipline process would apply. We NEVER leave offending posts up, as they are bad news for the quality of your database over the long run (this wouldn't really apply here though. It's a porn site, so they're already net-nannied out of myriad private networks. I have to worry about staying visible on educational servers and so on)... And nobody ever asks why someone else's post was deleted, because they already know it's none of their business. Discipline is always between the member and the site's staff. We NEVER air a member's dirty laundry publicly. We tell nosy members that if they want to know, they will have to ask the member themselves.
So I guess the takeaway is, you NEVER capitalize. :laughing: (emphasis added, highlight only)

*wonders if tallguy's quote above falls within his definition of busy-body-ness*

p.s. I thought you'd be pleased I stopped posting in blue. There's just no pleasing some people. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Speculator

1st Like
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Posts
375
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
53
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
This is Maxcok's entire "contribution" to the thread, lets play a little game, it's called spot the on topic non-inflammatory post. I've hope you've got your reading glasses on!

(on a serious note this just isn't funny anymore, how much longer will posters have to put up with his bullying and intimidation?)




That won't happen, because we're right on the verge of the Apocalypse. Jesus is coming back to rapture all the good Christians up to eternal rewards in Heaven, the Mormons and Scientologists will escape in spaceships to planets in other galaxies, and all the other heathens, pagans, aetheists and infidels are going straight to Hell.

In accordance with the rules and guidelines for the Politics forum, I call upon the OP to give citation and a link to his source material. Otherwise detract it and declare it what it is: complete and utter islamophobic horseshit.
4) Threads that are created should encourage discussion. They should also (whenever possible) contain a link to the topic being discussed.
Where is the OP anyway? Haven't seen him lately. :rolleyes:

I think you missed the boat.

But you act fast and get clear, you might still make it onto the mothership. Sez Xenu.

If that's the case, I guess this would apply? Posting articles & copyright infringement

This says it all. ^ You created an intentionally inflammatory shit-stirring thread to spark reactions, in short, trolling.

I'm really fucking tired of mindless bigots and lockstep right-wingers accusing compassionate, reasonable, independent thinkers of being on a "lib bandwagon". The irony is overwhelming.

More irony, from the King of Trolls, 90% of whose posts are combative, deliberately provocative, and/or knee-jerk attacks and insults directed at "stupid libtard socialist idiots" and decidedly off-topic. Again, trolling.

I'm not sure I understand your comments. When you say "refusing to acknowledge obvious trolling is refusing to sanction it" do you mean "refusing to acknowledge obvious trolling is the same as sanctioning it" or "refusing to respond to obvious trolling is refusing to sanction it", or something else? Would you mind clarifying your intended message here?

Do you mind clarifying who you think is refusing to acknowledge or deal with the problem?
Maybe I'm just being dense today, but I'm still not clear on your message.


Separate but related observation: Not surprisingly there are individuals who continue to deflectively and disingenuously protest that they are being labeled trolls because of their "ideology", rather than for their persistent pattern of trollish behavior.

Excuse me? What the hell are you on about, Mr. "Let me tell you how I run things at my site"?
I'll thank you to leave me out of your obsequious displays. Grow up.

Amazing, ain't it?

Or just endemic.

^ Still missing the essential point, and instead casting it as a left vs. right equation. Amazing.

Racist! (j/k) Anyway, you have to hang around here awhile to distinguish the pots from the kettles.
They're not all equally black, on either side.

Is it time for your bottle?

Anyway, I just happened to notice a recent post of yours, and it reminded me of how, as some sort of weird backtracking deflection from you calling out the mods, you out-of-the-blue took me to task for capitalizing, of all things. FWIW, in the absence of vocal inflections in typing, I occasionally CAPITALIZE, italicize, underline, bold, or even highlight certain words for emphasis, as many posters do. Why this is a problem for you or what relevance it has to anything completely escapes me. I'm also perplexed by your reference to "busy-body-ness", whatever the hell that means, not that I really care to have you explain.

To refresh:

No, you would never stoop so low as to capitalize:
So I guess the takeaway is, you NEVER capitalize. :laughing: (emphasis added, highlight only)

*wonders if tallguy's quote above falls within his definition of busy-body-ness*

p.s. I thought you'd be pleased I stopped posting in blue. There's just no pleasing some people. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

bott_boy

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Posts
13
Media
0
Likes
7
Points
148
Location
ACT (Australia)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Besides christainity is the only other religion that isn't mostly exclussive to 1 country.

Not sure if anyone else throughout this thread has commented already, but most religions aren't exclusive to one country: buddhism, judaism, hinduism, bahai... the list goes on.
 

Drifterwood

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Posts
18,677
Media
0
Likes
2,811
Points
333
Location
Greece
Only because it is you Crackers.

Yeah - again a source for this. DW - that's frankly a bit racist - any opinion polls or surveys to back up a single one of these stereotypical preconceptions. It's all a bit passe student yoof speak circa 1980 trying to inveigle yourself with the hot Socialist Worker chick!

Actually, I fucked everyone at college. I did not discriminate.

More like Black man rapes a white woman - DW stereotypes all white people as thinking that all black men are rapists.

This is not the issue. The issue is that some, Limbaugh types, will try to permeate the white middle class mind that this is the case.

How about - BNP leader makes comments about Muslim gangs predating on only young white girls in 2004 - all BNP supporters are violent racists.

Very interesting case and one that I have known about way before Uncle Jack weighed in. The issue here is how and why Mr. Griffin (please fuck off from Wales) chooses to portray the situation. Lefties can present it in one way and racists will present it like Mr. Griffin. They have agendas and the reporting matches the agenda.

The truth is that these men are sexual predators. The gangs are involved in the sex slave like industry. Their available victims are our uncared for in the community rejects. Muslims will point out that their daughters are not left to find some meaning on the streets at night, and please don't make a facetious comment.

These men have no respect for these girls/women, they are a commodity that our society creates. They then make hundreds of thousands out of taking advantage of them and their situation.

A few hundred Catholic priests are found to have buggered their altar boys over the last 40 years - all Catholic priests are paedophiles.

I would say that in this case, the problem is endemic, has known to be endemic and has been allowed to continue. No one is saying that all priests are paedophiles, rather that a situation has been allowed to exist in which the minority who are, are allowed to operate under the protection of a very powerful institution.

A violent arab illegal immigrant muslim rapes a woman, gets sent to jail, commits more offences, gets sent to jail, then doesn't get deported 'cause he knocked up a woman.

I imagine that this decision is within the terms of his human rights

Oh wait - all of that is what happened.:cool: How tolerant are we! In practice, your statement is probably the inverse to what happens in fact - in the UK at least.

It cuts both ways - everyone & everyside can find meaningless ad hominem ammunition in order to make lazy points.

The UK has a very long history of incorporating and growing our culture through immigration and or invasion. Tikka Masala is apparently now our national dish. We are a tolerant people.

Nice to make an ad homonem when claiming victimisation through ad hominem. Very sloppy :wink:.
 

davidjh7

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
2,607
Media
0
Likes
111
Points
283
Location
seattle
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
The only universal truth is that 4 out of 5 people are idiots, and the 5th one just hasn't realized it yet.....(and I unfortunately can not exclude myself from the human race, dammit!)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.