truly ENORMOUS cock!!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Original English Thick Cut

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Posts
91
Media
0
Likes
6
Points
93
Location
Vancouver BC
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
I believe thet penis is the real Mcoy! I am a very serious amateur photographer. I use a Canon 5D with a collection of old Zeiss lenses. I have used Lightroom for 5 years, and various edions of Photoshop/Elements for 10. I am verified on this site.

Ther is absolutely no sign of digital artifacts or halo in any of those shots. The changes in perspective which distorts some of his body are typical of the wide end of a very short focal lenth lens on a small sensor camera/camera phone. The most compelling evidence are the shadows cast by the flash which are absolutely normal given the sublect and placement of hand. The shot with the unbuttoned jeans also look normal for this type of camera. Pic #9. Pic 9 shows his erection obscuring tall grass at a beach. There are several sprigs of grass that begin one one side of his cock and continue on the other side.

There are 69 photos all look free of fakery. The comment that he looks bigger in some shots is also true. The wide end of the lens just does that particularly if it goes down to the equivalent of a 28mm (or wider) lens on a 35mm camera.

The final issue is the amount of time it would take to modify 69 photos. Even a truly superstar Photoshop editor would likely have to put in hundreds of hours to produce that collection.

Another explanation for the percieved varience of girth is simply the relative hardness of his erection. I have seen guys whose cocks swell in girth as they become more aroused. Jack Napier appears to swell to 2 3/4" or so as he nears orgasm, that is about a 3/4" greater that when he starts fucking.

I believe that no matter the poster's other issues on this site, his penis is what it looks like, simply huge beyond normality, likely only a handfull of men on earth can match that size. It is truly amazing.

So, if someone wan't to challenge my thesis, please feel free. Just state your experience with photography and digital imaging. I would expect you to produce a verification photo full body including face (as is mine) showing all the camera gear you shoot with. I will do the same in a heartbeat. I'll also put up a few photos I am especially proud of, in a new album. If anyone wants to phone me I'll provide my number, begins with area code 778 (Vancouver British Columbia Canada), To discuss this.

I think this Leon has been granted a wonder of the world. He should donate it to the Smithsonian upon his demise!
 

HappyBoi

Admired Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Posts
1,480
Media
8
Likes
916
Points
148
Location
Earth
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I've seen these photos on so many different accounts now.. pick one and stick with it.

I'm not a fan of extreme close-ups, I always think it looks a lot smaller when you have to make such close-ups. I mean, sure.. a few.. but 69 with NO pictures that shows body or a distant perspective? ^^ It just makes you question. :)

truly HILARIOUS cock

I think these 2 show that something is amiss:
First:
http://www.lpsg.org/members/leon9999/albums/enormous+cock%2C+measured%2C+underwear+etc.../528196-a.html
the phone is like 1/4 the width of the cock and the height is like the size of the head
Then you look at this one with the same phone:
http://www.lpsg.org/members/leon999...asured,+underwear+etc.../528066-dsc04064.html
the phone is like 2/3 the width and is very clearly much longer than just the head of the penis.

Good photo work, you should put it to good use and do photography/image editing.

EDIT:

Fake tape measurer, slack that you cant see, straight up photoshop...

In the first picture the cellphone/hand is a lot further back than the cock.. as to create an illusion. Haha, hilarious. :biggrin1:
 

wilko

Experimental Member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Posts
138
Media
2
Likes
10
Points
103
Location
UK
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
In the first picture the cellphone/hand is a lot further back than the cock.. as to create an illusion. Haha, hilarious. :biggrin1:
The penis is blurry and the phone is in focus, something which our very serious amateur photographer up there seems to have missed.
 

Original English Thick Cut

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Posts
91
Media
0
Likes
6
Points
93
Location
Vancouver BC
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Ameteur photog back! Pic 36 the one referenced above: I have blown it up on the screen of my mac to almost life size (the phone that is). The dick is slightly more in focus than the phone. But neither is well focussed.

Try recreating the shot with your own equipment, getting both items in question in the same plane of focus is difficult unless the phone was taped to a penis. The difference in focus is due to the extremely limited depth of field when using a macro function.(I know macro lenses can magnify greater than life size). The lens on small sensored cameras has to be excellent to make really sharp pics when enlarged. The real limit for a 12MP 1/2.3" sensor is 4X6 inches (paper size not dick size). Enlargements of that sensor size will start to look crappy at 8.5X11 (don't we wish). My own dick pics were shot by me one handed on a Nikon P5100. the 5100 cost almost $400 when it first came out. It is pretty good for a small point and shoot and produces fairly good 8.5x11's as long as the light is good. If the light sucks then I covert to black and white as it gets rid of the chroma noise. Unless using a high end Canon, Panasonic, whatever, you will be limited in how sharp the focus is when blown-up and it still wont give sharp macros if the plane of focus isn't flat!

I'm still convinced he's real. I have no idea who he really is or if it the poster's penis. He could have borrowed someone elses!
 

hud01

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Posts
4,983
Media
0
Likes
106
Points
133
Location
new york city
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
no matter how big, it is an impressive huge piece of meat and I have stroked one almost that thick, so it is possible
 

D_JuanAFock

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Posts
538
Media
0
Likes
9
Points
103
I believe thet penis is the real Mcoy! I am a very serious amateur photographer. I use a Canon 5D with a collection of old Zeiss lenses. I have used Lightroom for 5 years, and various edions of Photoshop/Elements for 10. I am verified on this site.

Ther is absolutely no sign of digital artifacts or halo in any of those shots. The changes in perspective which distorts some of his body are typical of the wide end of a very short focal lenth lens on a small sensor camera/camera phone. The most compelling evidence are the shadows cast by the flash which are absolutely normal given the sublect and placement of hand. The shot with the unbuttoned jeans also look normal for this type of camera. Pic #9. Pic 9 shows his erection obscuring tall grass at a beach. There are several sprigs of grass that begin one one side of his cock and continue on the other side.

There are 69 photos all look free of fakery. The comment that he looks bigger in some shots is also true. The wide end of the lens just does that particularly if it goes down to the equivalent of a 28mm (or wider) lens on a 35mm camera.

The final issue is the amount of time it would take to modify 69 photos. Even a truly superstar Photoshop editor would likely have to put in hundreds of hours to produce that collection.

Another explanation for the percieved varience of girth is simply the relative hardness of his erection. I have seen guys whose cocks swell in girth as they become more aroused. Jack Napier appears to swell to 2 3/4" or so as he nears orgasm, that is about a 3/4" greater that when he starts fucking.

I believe that no matter the poster's other issues on this site, his penis is what it looks like, simply huge beyond normality, likely only a handfull of men on earth can match that size. It is truly amazing.

So, if someone wan't to challenge my thesis, please feel free. Just state your experience with photography and digital imaging. I would expect you to produce a verification photo full body including face (as is mine) showing all the camera gear you shoot with. I will do the same in a heartbeat. I'll also put up a few photos I am especially proud of, in a new album. If anyone wants to phone me I'll provide my number, begins with area code 778 (Vancouver British Columbia Canada), To discuss this.

I think this Leon has been granted a wonder of the world. He should donate it to the Smithsonian upon his demise!
I am not saying that the photos are necessarily not real, I am saying that they are not an accurate depiction of what he really has. There are some photos which look doctored in some form, like this one:
http://www.lpsg.org/members/leon9999/albums/enormous+cock%2C+measured%2C+underwear+etc.../528915-9.html
but in general they look like a huge amount of simple camera tricks.

I mean, tell me this: This is a site dedicated to having a large penis. How many are even remotely close to 8"+ girth and that kind of apparent length? I am talking CLOSE to that length/girth. I imagine of the tens of thousands of people here there would be at least one other, instead of the same person that keeps coming back after being banned. He clearly gets off on trolling too, considering he has all of these shots and not a single full body shot.

I want to give some definition to how big a nearly 9" circumference head would be, imagine a 1 liter bottle. That is a little over 9" in circumference, that is how big around his head supposedly is.
 
Last edited:

Calboner

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Posts
9,028
Media
29
Likes
7,893
Points
433
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
When you can see that 180 degrees of the circle of tape takes up 3 inches of tape while the tape indicates a girth of 8 inches, or 2 1/2 inches while the tape indicates a girth of 8 1/2 inches, it is impossible to maintain that the measurements are truthful. For these photographs to show true measurements, the penis would have to have a semi-circumference of 3 inches on one side and 5 inches on the other in the first case, 2 1/2 inches on one side and 6 inches on the other in the second case.
 

AtomicMouse1950

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 30, 2011
Posts
2,968
Media
22
Likes
462
Points
218
Age
73
Location
Placerville , Ca.
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I apologize, I didn't mean to offend you, I meant my anaconda remark as a complement and not a slight. I don't get to see a cock as long and thick as yours. And I liked the photos very much. You have an impressive cock. I wish I had been that gifted. It's clear you have been. I Sincerely sorry if I offended you. :wink:


ho ho think what u like :) wow u have a lot to say always! haha im out of here...i will leave this thread to you and your obsession...bye! im gone :)!! hahaha im sure u cant resist answering..see u!
 

Original English Thick Cut

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Posts
91
Media
0
Likes
6
Points
93
Location
Vancouver BC
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
So as stated earlier, if real, he is so big he has to be one in a million or perhaps one in 10 million. So maybe there are as few as 15 that size in the US or perhaps as many as 150. Hence the chances are unlikely anyone would run across the monster or his brethren. I may have done so.

Many years ago in the spirit of "try anything once" I wnt to a gay orgy in a dark room. While in the dog pile my vision was blocked by a guy fucking. There was just enough light to make me notice a sillhoutte of gargantuan proportions. Being very curious I reached up and felt the largest dick I've ever touched. I gently closed my thumb and forefinger around the pistioning cock. My fingers went about as far as they do holding a pop can (which is just under 8 1/4"). He was punchfucking a willing bottom like there was no tomorrow. I'd make an educated guess that the dick I touched had about the girth in question here.

I don't buy the argument of simple camera tricks, so if anyone here wants to shoot pics that make their dick appear 25% larger in all dimentions, and prove how they did it; I'll gladly eat humble pie.

Calboners estimate of the amount of tape visible doesn't wash as I tried it with a tape measure on the plastic pop bottle and the most amount of tape I can see is about 3 1/2", but the tape measures almost 8 1/2". I also used a caliper and measured a diameter of 2 11/16" pretty much the same thing.

I'm convinced what we see is indeed as declared, with the proviso that it might be a truly excellent prosthesis. But I'm still betting it's real!
 

D_JuanAFock

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Posts
538
Media
0
Likes
9
Points
103
So as stated earlier, if real, he is so big he has to be one in a million or perhaps one in 10 million. So maybe there are as few as 15 that size in the US or perhaps as many as 150. Hence the chances are unlikely anyone would run across the monster or his brethren. I may have done so.

Many years ago in the spirit of "try anything once" I wnt to a gay orgy in a dark room. While in the dog pile my vision was blocked by a guy fucking. There was just enough light to make me notice a sillhoutte of gargantuan proportions. Being very curious I reached up and felt the largest dick I've ever touched. I gently closed my thumb and forefinger around the pistioning cock. My fingers went about as far as they do holding a pop can (which is just under 8 1/4"). He was punchfucking a willing bottom like there was no tomorrow. I'd make an educated guess that the dick I touched had about the girth in question here.

I don't buy the argument of simple camera tricks, so if anyone here wants to shoot pics that make their dick appear 25% larger in all dimentions, and prove how they did it; I'll gladly eat humble pie.

Calboners estimate of the amount of tape visible doesn't wash as I tried it with a tape measure on the plastic pop bottle and the most amount of tape I can see is about 3 1/2", but the tape measures almost 8 1/2". I also used a caliper and measured a diameter of 2 11/16" pretty much the same thing.

I'm convinced what we see is indeed as declared, with the proviso that it might be a truly excellent prosthesis. But I'm still betting it's real!
I dont get it. The size claimed in this thread is one in 10 million yet there are SOOOO many people that post claiming to have experienced a similar size. This is a site that absolutely glorifies the large penis but there are no pictures (unless you include this persons) that verify it. Even more strange, the only one that could POTENTIALLY be counted as verification is so much bigger than the others that it is outlandish. If there were other people that posted that were near this size it would make more sense.

I mean, a 9" penis is absurdly rare. A 7"+ girth is probably equally rare. And he is claiming to be 10x8 (or 9 if you count the head). It would literally be one of a kind and the biggest penis in existence. Yet, he offers no straight angle normal lens full body shots or video.

PS: If you want evidence of people making their penis look 25% bigger than it actually is, look at the porn industry.
 
Last edited:

D_Choad Lowe

Sexy Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Posts
332
Media
0
Likes
31
Points
63
i think you guys are all right :biggrin1:

this is a truly enormous cock AND he still used a bunch of camera tricks to make it look even bigger.
there is no way that penis is 10x8 inches, but it's still pretty damn big (my guess: 8,5x6.5) and i am also quite sure that there is NO photoshopping involved.

I don't buy the argument of simple camera tricks, so if anyone here wants to shoot pics that make their dick appear 25% larger in all dimentions, and prove how they did it; I'll gladly eat humble pie!
25% is very easy
In my gallery I often used a wide angle lens (sometimes even a fisheye) to make my dick look bigger. i'm nowhere as big as the threadstarter, but people on here always guess me a lot bigger than i actually am, which is around 6,5'' x 5'' (acurate standing none bone pressed measurement from the top)

check out the three pics below:

http://www.lpsg.org/members/excelsus/albums/excelsus's+gallery+pictures/470946-jerk.html
http://www.lpsg.org/members/excelsus/albums/excelsus's+gallery+pictures/471099-hard.html
http://www.pornoimg.com/uploads/imgp1350jpg_1307347824.jpg

- the black and white pic is shot with a 18mm wide angle lens from a close distance. i grabbed my dick as low as possible, so it looks if i could jerky of with both hands (i can't :wink:)
- the second pic is taken the same way. wide angle and close distance. i grabbed my dick it in a way to create the illusion my fingers couldn't even reach around my shaft (they can :wink:)
- the third pic i shot two minutes ago with a regular lens and without any effort at all. the result is a boring picture of an average sized dick which doesn't look very impressive at all

qed! :biggrin1:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.