Trump 2020

[phonehome]

HEY asshole I am pretty GD sure I DID answer your question and did so in EXTREME DETAIL

But as per your usual you did not like that answer so you "pretend" you did not get one.

 

[malakos]

as if anyone would believe anyone would rig anything for Hilary - she fucked her own chances by believing it was in the bag.

Right, because I'm sure those oh-so-accurate polls so severely in her favor were simply objectively analyzing the situation as it appeared to be; they for sure weren't a tactic for trying to sway the election.

 

[malakos]

bet you believe in the right to bear arms!

As awful as it is, I cannot say that I'm surprised that you have zero regard for the constitution your own nation was founded on.

 

[malakos]

Only absolute moron will make the claim they they know for a fact that it had NO EFFECT.

At the end of the day, both sides used ethically grey means to sway the election. One side played that game better than the other did, and hence won the election. Big deal. That's the way "democracy" works (it's an exceptionally corruptible system). None of this is a surprise to me, and none of it particularly gets under my skin.

 

[keenobserver]

So you can’t answer my question?

Another win for me.

Since you are only playing with yourself in your mind its always a win.

 

[phonehome]

MAL--

So the fact that it was foreign government and one far from being a real "ally" that got involved and when they saw they had good chance at doing it picked the guy they wanted that does not bother you ??

Imagine if it had been lets say Mexico and it was in the other direction.

You know GD well Republicans would be squealing like stuck pigs.

Paul Ryan would have figured out a way to ensure that the "electors" never voted in the first place.

 

[malakos]

MAL--

So the fact that it was foreign government

The Kremlin? Even if you were right about about Russian hackers influencing the election (so far I've only seen the assertions on the surface, not the evidence of it, though that's not to say it's not there), that doesn't in itself demonstrate involvement by the Kremlin.

and one far from being a real "ally"

Eh... better than a lot of the other nations that we overtly support.

that got involved and when they saw they had good chance at doing it picked the guy they wanted that does not bother you ??

For one thing, I'm not sure that the interests of Russia are inherently wrong. You can't assume something is bad just because the Russian government wants it.

For another, it's not clear to me that they actually cared a great deal about who won this election.

Imagine if it had been lets say Mexico and it was in the other direction.

You know GD well Republicans would be squealing like stuck pigs.

That has everything to do with what I've already said. All of that is how one plays the game. There is no legitimate moral high ground involved in any of it, on any side.

Paul Ryan would have figured out a way to ensure that the "electors" never voted in the first place.

Yeah... no. If you think about the ideological foundations of the GOP it shouldn't be too difficult to realize that they have far less room to be rallying against the Electoral College than the Democrats do.

 

[Wilson_90]

If you think Mueller has only indicted Russians, and not members of Trump’s inner circle—most of whom have already pleaded guilty to various crimes and are cooperating fully with his investigation—then you’re the one ignoring reality.

If mueller actually had anything on trump to begin with, trump wouldn’t still be in office.
Mueller is like the twin of Michael Wolff

 

[phonehome]

Watergate took over 2 years.

Mueller is taking his time and building a airtight case.

When he questions Trump he is going to already know all the answers to all the questions and he will catch Trump in lie after lie

Also IMO he waiting until after the November election so that if the R's loose the house as many expect then Paul Ryan will not have the option 'to just do nothing" and on the odd chance that the House does not flip then IMO he WILL indict the president.

 

[Wilson_90]

Watergate took over 2 years.

Mueller is taking his time and building a airtight case.

When he questions Trump he is going to already know all the answers to all the questions and he will catch Trump in lie after lie

Also IMO he waiting until after the November election so that if the R's loose the house as many expect then Paul Ryan will not have the option 'to just do nothing" and on the odd chance that the House does not flip then IMO he WILL indict the president.

The delusion is strong. If you’re arguing that trump should be in prison, by that standard, Hillary should be in there already....and have triple the sentence.

 

[chrisrobin]

More irrelevant dribbling. Tell me how 13 Russians on Facebook overcame Hollywood, the media, foreign donors, Saudi Arabia and the election in general?

I’ll wait.

Go back to your headlines on Fox News and your picture book newspapers.
They don't call Oz the outback for nothing, in fact most people think it is nothing.
If you love Trump so much come and live here instead of factious talk from a bean bag. outside a dunny

 

[Wilson_90]

Go back to your headlines on Fox News and your picture book newspapers.
They don't call Oz the outback for nothing, in fact most people think it is nothing.
If you love Trump so much come and live here instead of factious talk from a bean bag. outside a dunny

Again, you can’t answer my question and use insults instead.

What a shame

 

[Klingsor]

If mueller actually had anything on trump to begin with, trump wouldn’t still be in office.

That's not how investigations work. It's not what you have to begin with; it's what you have at the end.

 

[Tight_N_Juicy]

Funny how people kept hounding on and on over Hillary and Benghazi after it was proven that there was no law broken... now with Trump it's all dismissal before the investigation is even close to over.

Hypocrisy at its finest.

 

[phonehome]

Yes and amid all the "lock her up" chants and statements that she should "already be in prison" and for "three times as long" as Trump may ever be NONE of them including the asshole from Australia who is such an EXPERT on all things in the US can ever tell you what LAW, FEDERAL LAW that is, that she ever broke, directed others to break, or was otherwise aware was broken and what PROOF/EVIDENCE, you know that things the asshole from Australia is always demanding all the time that she did break said law.

I will give you a HUGE CLUE she did NOT repeat NOT violate "the espionage act"

As someone who had TS/SBI/SCI clearance for almost 20 years and was in an actual SCI billet on the JCS staff I can say that for sure.

I know what it says, I also know what it does not say.

I love movie references.

To quote Daniel Caffey AKA Tom Cruise in "a few good men" "Don't tell me the law, I know the law"

 

[HotThroatLA]

Breaking news: Mueller and the FBI just raided the office of grifter-fixer "lawyer" Michael Cohen.
Just like his con-man master, he is knee-deep in decades of criminal activity, thuggery, and cover ups.
I look forward to his time in prison, because it's coming.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/09/...-of-trumps-longtime-lawyer-michael-cohen.html

 

[docthompson]

Another momentous first for the great Donald John Trump.
He has become the first president to give the longest warning about his intentions to run for a second term ever!
Trump should run for Diet Pipsi and Pizza and shut th e fuck up.Note he says is important.

 

[docthompson]

 

[docthompson]

 

[docthompson]