Trump 2020

b.c.

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Posts
20,540
Media
0
Likes
21,780
Points
468
Location
at home
Verification
View
Gender
Male
weez gunna umpeach dat cheeto n shiet

... the good news being at least you've dispensed with that phoney a--- pseudo intellectual highbrow s------ about the preservation of the Europoid genepool and have gotten closer to the heart... [ahem] of the matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted15807

b.c.

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Posts
20,540
Media
0
Likes
21,780
Points
468
Location
at home
Verification
View
Gender
Male
Yes and amid all the "lock her up" chants and statements that she should "already be in prison" and for "three times as long" as Trump may ever be NONE of them including the asshole from Australia who is such an EXPERT on all things in the US can ever tell you what LAW, FEDERAL LAW that is, that she ever broke, directed others to break, or was otherwise aware was broken and what PROOF/EVIDENCE, you know that things the asshole from Australia is always demanding all the time that she did break said law.

I will give you a HUGE CLUE she did NOT repeat NOT violate "the espionage act"

As someone who had TS/SBI/SCI clearance for almost 20 years and was in an actual SCI billet on the JCS staff I can say that for sure.

I know what it says, I also know what it does not say.

I love movie references.

To quote Daniel Caffey AKA Tom Cruise in "a few good men" "Don't tell me the law, I know the law"

Funny how ANXIOUS these Trump shills, supporters, apologists, and BOTS are to quash the Mueller investigation.

Like I pointed out in another thread, the GOP conducted SEVEN investigations on Hillary, held 33 hearings, and spent 30 million in taxpayer money in the process. So I'd imagine if there was anything they could charge her on, they WOULD'VE.

Two YEARS LATER those fkrs are STILL running against Hillary.

 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted15807
D

deleted15807

Guest
Funny how ANXIOUS these Trump shills, supporters, apologists, and BOTS are to quash the Mueller investigation.

Like I pointed out in another thread, the GOP conducted SEVEN investigations on Hillary, held 33 hearings, and spent 30 million in taxpayer money in the process. So I'd imagine if there was anything they could charge her on, they WOULD'VE.

Two YEARS LATER those fkrs are STILL running against Hillary.


If the Clintons died tomorrow they would have them stuffed and propped up so Fox and Friends could go after them. What show could we do without an archenemy? Of course Foxy News would not admit they are dead and stuffed but still run shows against them with pans of them stuffed with eerie smiles on their faces. Then move the figures around to pizza parlors, pow-wowing with George Soros and arranging hits on their enemies with Tony Soprano.

They all live in a world of rampant fiction your imagination is the only limit what you can do with the Clintons. Jeez think about the CGI possiblties.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

tripod

Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Posts
6,666
Media
14
Likes
1,839
Points
333
Location
USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
the GOP conducted SEVEN investigations on Hillary, held 33 hearings, and spent 30 million in taxpayer money in the process. So I'd imagine if there was anything they could charge her on, they WOULD'VE.

It was and still is quite an obsession. Sooooo many assholes on the job of trying to send Hillary to jail that I never even lifted a finger to see if anything they ever said was true.

I know you don't keep up with these sorts of people but you should see the stuff they are freaking out about on a regular basis... OMG... they all think they are on some sort of anti-pedophile vigilante crusade. They see pedophiles everywhere.

Have you heard the latest about Tom Hanks? They think he is a member of a worldwide pedo-cult because some woman has come forward and claimed to be his "assigned" sex-slave. You can't make this shit up...
 
  • Like
Reactions: b.c.

malakos

Superior Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Posts
8,363
Media
30
Likes
6,524
Points
223
Location
Cumming, GA, USA
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
... the good news being at least you've dispensed with that phoney a--- pseudo intellectual highbrow s------ about the preservation of the Europoid genepool and have gotten closer to the heart... [ahem] of the matter.

Do you get off on making your posts as vague and opaque as possible?
 

phonehome

Superior Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Posts
3,895
Media
0
Likes
4,275
Points
343
Gender
Male
If everyone will remember right about the time of this meeting DJT was out there talking for about a week about how he was going to give this major speech where he was going to expose all this dirt on Hillary Clinton on as I recall the following Monday.

Well that Monday came and went and there was no speech

What we know now but did not know at the time was between when he hyping that speech and that Monday was that "the tower meeting" happened and the dirt that was promised did not (according to them) get delivered.

It ALWAYS seemed that he knew of the meeting and in advance and what was supposed to be the result of the meeting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: keenobserver

tripod

Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Posts
6,666
Media
14
Likes
1,839
Points
333
Location
USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
It ALWAYS seemed that he knew of the meeting and in advance and what was supposed to be the result of the meeting.

1). Veselnitskaya is a lawyer
2). She has connections to the Russian legal system
3). She's worked closely with Russian government officials
4). Veselnitskaya is Petyr (and Denis) Katsyv's lawyer
5). She seems to be involved in the Federal prosecution of Bill Browder
6). She set up the Human Rights Accountability Global Initiative Foundation, or HRAGI which is devoted to overturning the adoption ban
7). She was wooing the Families for Russian and Ukrainian Adoption Including Neighboring Countries, or FRUA to get behind her effort to overturn the Magnitsky Act.

Bill Browder owed a shit ton of taxes on the massive profits her made in Russia... didn't pay... never planned on paying his taxes and fled the fucking country before he could face prosecution for his tax evasion. There is a federal case against Bill Browder. By all appearances... Natalia Veselnitskaya is working on this case... the case is quite complex with many moving parts so Veselnitskaya would be working closely with ALL SORTS of Russian Justice Department officials as well as other government employees.

She has done work as an "informer"... or "intelligencer" for the Prosecutor General - one who makes a practice especially for a financial reward of informing against others for violations of penal laws.

Not quite the "Kremlin informant" label that was put on her... but instead some sort of legal snitch that has "informed" for the Ministry of Justice. Possibly more closely related to the American FBI which provides informants to the U.S. Justice Department for the prosecution of federal cases. The FBI does counter-Intelligence though... I haven't seen any evidence that she works for the Investigative Committee of Russia and seems to 100% legitimately work in the criminal justice system.

Her story about the Magnitsky Act, adoptions and Bill Browder is all legit.

What I HAVEN'T seen is any evidence that she was involved in any way as an agent of espionage.

Rob Goldstone is the individual responsible for the "she's going to give us dirt on Hillary" bullshit. Veselnitskaya never represented the meeting as such...

Basically Rob Goldstone is responsible for the "dirt on Hillary" canard... THERE WAS NO DIRT.

Natalia was in the U.S. to register the Human Rights Accountability Global Initiative Foundation which was dedicated to overturning the adoption ban. She was also in the U.S. to screen a film about the Magnitsky Act... meet with FUSION GPS and settle a money laundering case involving her client Petyr Katsyv's son Denis... she attended some hearings... updated her facebook account... she had fun in the U.S. The U.S. Justice Department paid her expenses while in the U.S.

You'd fucking think Obama's Justice Department under Loretta Lynch would be smart enough not to bend the rules and get a FSB agent a VISA... and NOT BE DUMB ENOUGH TO PAY HER EXPENSES while she was visiting the U.S.
 

phonehome

Superior Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Posts
3,895
Media
0
Likes
4,275
Points
343
Gender
Male
And what the hell if anything does all that have to do with the FACT that that according to his E-mails Don JR. thought , because he was told that he/they were about to get dirt on Hillary Clinton, dirt that he was told was being provided by the Russian government and that was just part of their effort to see to it that his father got elected and he was just "if it is what you say it is , I love it" fucking fine with all that.

And what the hell if anything does all that have to do with the fact DJT for days was talking about this big time speech where he was going to expose all this stuff about Hillary Clinton and then when the time came he never gave that speech and even at the time when we learned about the trump tower meeting it was easy enough to see that the hyping the speech came before the meeting happened, the speech was scheduled for after the meeting was to take place and then when the speech never took place it seemed due to the fact that the promised dirt apparently did not arrive.

Even before this latest revelation it was fairly obvious that DJT had some kind of knowledge about this meeting ahead of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: keenobserver

malakos

Superior Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Posts
8,363
Media
30
Likes
6,524
Points
223
Location
Cumming, GA, USA
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Actually, my point was, that's usually YOUR specialty.

Of which you have no evidence, but only speculation. Your only basis for asserting otherwise is simply because you don't trust me and because I use certain expressions from internet/meme culture upon which you insist on imposing your own interpretation (rather than ever considering the speaker's own interpretation of his words). But as for the apparent reality our differing writing styles, what one sees is that my remarks are generally quite frank, straightforward, open, and revealing, while you, for whatever reason, often intentionally speak in code and employ vague expressions. You often deliberately suggest that you are thinking someone is something while refusing to state what it is. I have no clue why you do this so often. And I find it curious that someone in your position would accuse someone with a far more transparent posting style of being the specialist of vagueness and opacity.