Nope. I can't be adamant to look for something that I already know doesn't exist.
So you clarify my point that all politicians have faults that one could pick out and provide as ammunition against them in the capacity of their job. Thank you for the back-up friend!
Well, I'm letting you know that there
are some people who don't do stupid things like go by a person's name when judging their ability to do a job. Yet when I provided two, real political incidents related to Jeb Bush that do raise questions from his critics, you then go on and provide a ridiculous, red herring of a response about searching for a politician with an unblemished record. Oy vey.
Yes! We agree again! As I said, I happen to be one of those people too! And I am in agreement with you that Jeb Bush is not a perfect politician! However, I think you can see that it would be apparent that he would get a bad name for being a member of the Bush family because A. His brother's unpopular presidency and B. People don't want to see 3 our of last 5 presidents ascend from the same family. A bit too much like a monarchy if you know what I mean. If his last name were Harris, I don't think he would receive the same vitriol. And I completely understand you pointing out some of his negative faults. Perhaps you could do some research on some of his positive attributes as well? Or maybe you are far too left-wing for such a sensible practice
I honestly don't give a damn what you believe at this point. Also, it's rather hypocritical of you to accuse me of insinuating something when you started your response with one.
"Brain crash!" is an insinuation? I thought that was my admittance to an error. Perhaps you need to reacquaint yourself with Webster's old friend!
And our current president's name is Barack. Your point?
My point, is that ignorant people tend to use the fact that President Obama's middle name is the same as the first name of a certain enemy of our country. You know the same people who would hail George Washington as a founding father and never question the fact that he had the same name as our enemy King George. I would have that that was obvious, as I was agreeing with you and helping you prove your point. Perhaps you should retire the eye-roll till you are ready to use it big guy!
Going bankrupt is not a sign of success. Going by the rhetoric of most Libertarians and Conservatives at this point, someone like Trump should have worked hard and paid all of that debt off. He should have cut his budgets, stopped the excess spending and not rely on governing authorities to take care of his needs. Apparently, he couldn't do that. But he was nasty to Obama so all is conveniently forgotten, eh?
LOL. This is where you lose the plot. This is what we call a joke. Honestly, I see where you missed it: You live in a world where EVERYTHING is Left or Right and cannot comprehend that there are people such as myself who see both sides to an issue or even the humor in something as ridiculous as a bankrupted business man would be a quality candidate for president. Take of the Lefty shades my friend. You'll find a lot more truth looking at things from the middle.