Trump inspired hate

[b.c.]

You're superhuman I guess because researchers have shown even the blind "see" race. It's really just an excuse and an attempt to call the accuser racist simply because they acknowledge its existence.

......blind people use non-visual cues to determine race when meeting a new person. They combine evidence from their other senses – hair texture, accent and other markers (with varying degrees of reliability) – to create an understanding of someone’s racial identity. And once a blind person figured out a new acquaintance’s race, they would treat that person accordingly.

When you say you 'don't see race', you’re ignoring racism, not helping to solve it​

It's a crock, anyway. He doesn't see race. Riiiiight. This is the guy who, only months into Trump's occupancy, wrote how he was the greatest president in US history, and how Obama spoke garbage, and who (just above) described immigrants who may, by law, have the RIGHT to vote "illegals."

Also the guy who "liked" a lot of the bigoted, racist shit others (once here, now "departed") had written.

Apparently some here think we don't remember what they've said... that there's no posting HISTORY.

 

[Elmer Gantry]

When you say you 'don't see race', you’re ignoring racism, not helping to solve it

Best oxymoron I've come across this week. So even if you're not being racist, you obviously are.

Identity politics at its best.

 

[Elmer Gantry]

It's a crock, anyway. He doesn't see race. Riiiiight. This is the guy who, only months into Trump's occupancy, wrote how he was the greatest president in US history, and how Obama spoke garbage, and who (just above) described immigrants who may, by law, have the RIGHT to vote "illegals."

Also the guy who "liked" a lot of the bigoted, racist shit others (once here, now "departed") had written.

Apparently some here think we don't remember what they've said... that there's no posting HISTORY.

b.c. liking Trump and not liking Obama is not inherently racist.Neither is any of the "shit" I've posted recently or in the past.

This has taken over the war on terrorism/war without end by the look of it. No mater how you play this, it's an agenda that can be pushed for as long as you want with no logical conclusion.

Well, not any nice ones at least.

 

[b.c.]

b.c. liking Trump and not liking Obama is not inherently racist.Neither is any of the "shit" I've posted recently or in the past.

This has taken over the war on terrorism/war without end by the look of it. No mater how you play this, it's an agenda that can be pushed for as long as you want with no logical conclusion.

Well, not any nice ones at least.

My post that you quoted wasn't about you, bud. If you look again it was a follow-up to a post made by Sargon in reply to another poster.

And you're right, liking or not liking Obama is not inherently racist. But as I said, one can take the sum of what a person has said and doesn't say, what one objects to and doesn't object to, and pretty accurately draw one or two conclusions.

The person to whom I'm referring, in past posts, had proclaimed (in June of last year, only months into Trump's occupancy of the Oval Office) that Trump is the best US president there ever was, not withstanding mind you, the racist, bigoted elements of his campaign, pronouncements, statements, policies, etc. Granted, not an inherently racist position.

At almost the same time he wrote that Obama was the WORST president the US has EVER had. A rather dubiously questionable statement by any LOGICAL analysis, but (one might argue) still not inherently racist. Maybe not even when he also suggested that Obama was of extremely low intelligence, among other general condemnations of the man not supported by any actual fact.

But then he makes the ridiculously absurd pronouncement that Antifas is a thousand times WORSE than the KKK, the latter a group of U.S. born TERRORISTS who've had a documented and sordid history of MURDERING black men, women, and children.

At which point one has got to finally wonder what the FUCK is THIS guy's problem???

Which leaves me, like I said, with one or two conclusions: Either he IS a racist/bigot, OR, he is incredibly IGNORANT of many facts, whether deliberately or otherwise. You tell me.

In closing, let me leave you with this observation that I'm made herein on a number of occasions past:

If YOU support, encourage, embrace, endorse, defend, dismiss and/or give tacit approval of racist, bigoted, white nationalistic anti immigrant sentiment, does it REALLY fucking MATTER whether you are ACTUALLY a racist or not?

 

[StormfrontFL]

b.c. liking Trump and not liking Obama is not inherently racist.Neither is any of the "shit" I've posted recently or in the past.

This has taken over the war on terrorism/war without end by the look of it. No mater how you play this, it's an agenda that can be pushed for as long as you want with no logical conclusion.

Well, not any nice ones at least.

Someone once claimed race had nothing to do with his dislike of Obama. He claimed it was his lack of political experience. His interjecting himself into situations he shouldn't. It was his being too divisive. All the reasons he gave for hating Obama are ignored now that it is Trump. He even called his lack of political experience a plus. Now I ask you, what is the difference between the two men? Political affiliation? Age? Race?
Consider that this same man saw nothing wrong with blacks being stopped indiscriminately and searched. He also thought blacks were not qualified to hold certain jobs that should have gone to whites. Now tell me again how it's not all about race.

This is just one man but go on just about any site and you'll see comments denigrating race. Cmon, Michelle Obama wore a sleeveless dress and according to a lot of GOP sycophants that was unbecoming of a lady whereas Melania poses nearly nude or wrapped around another woman and all you hear from them is how that is regal, beautiful, and classy.

Oh, and while you're at it why not look again at some of the placards held by those protesting Obama. You'll see him dressed as a witch doctor with a bone through his nose or in a watermelon field with a bucket of fried chicken and a grape soda. Not a word about his policies. No, the focus was on negative racial stereotypes. As b.c. pointed out the Obama hatred began even before his first day in office. If he had done half the things Trump has done or tried it's a sure bet that the same people who rave about how Trump is making America great again would be calling for Obama's removal. With them it's not about policy it's bout WHO is in "their" house.

Not everyone who likes Trump is inherently racist but looking away from/past or condoning racism makes you as guilty as an outright racist. You want to prove you're not racist....call out racists. Don't just make excuses or try to point the finger at those who do condemn them.

The above wasn't directed at anyone in particular just tired of seeing the same bull from the usual suspects.

 

[deleted15807]

But as I said, one can take the sum of what a person has said and doesn't say, what one objects to and doesn't object to, and pretty accurately draw one or two conclusions.

This is the thing. Are they that stupid they can't see it or do they think we are so stupid we can't see it? Or is it some combination?

Whatever the case we have a new ignore member. More troll than anything else.

If YOU support, encourage, embrace, endorse, defend, dismiss and/or give tacit approval of racist, bigoted, white nationalistic anti immigrant sentiment, does it REALLY fucking MATTER whether you are ACTUALLY a racist or not?

Zero difference.

When Trump says immigrants from Africa and Haiti are from "shithole countries" and why can't we get more Norwegians yet his support among his cave-dwelling xenophobic base remains unchanged that means yes you are a racist or you support one. In the fight against racism there is no difference.

 

[b.c.]

This is the thing. Are they that stupid they can't see it or do they think we are so stupid we can't see it? Or is it some combination?

Whatever the case we have a new ignore member. More troll than anything else.

I agree.

Fact is, this guy has shown up, out of the blue, on at least three occasions since our initial encounter back in October (when I pointed out the hypocrisy of his making some ridiculous blanket condemnation of Obama as "the worst president ever in U.S. history" while challenging us to say two things nice about Trump),

and EACH time, he's popped into conversations he's had absolutely NOTHING to do with, lobbing insults, mischaracterizations and the like in my direction. He's done this to others as well, including yourself.

And all I can say is, if you're is going to engage in trollish behavior and "DRIVE BY SHITTINGS," then expect the possibility that you MIGHT get "shat" UPON.

 

[b.c.]

...correction to above last paragraph.... "if you are going," or, "if you're going" ... what can I say, it's Mardi Gras and I'm a little...erm... "distracted."
("eh la bas...")

 

[chicagosam]

...And all I can say is, if you're is going to engage in trollish behavior and "DRIVE BY SHITTINGS," then expect the possibility that you MIGHT get "shat" UPON.

Ah, conjugations! I learn so much here.

Is it time to get the troll cookies out again? Perhaps with ExLax? They can practice “conjugating” as they depart.

http://conjugator.reverso.net/conjugation-english-verb-shit.html

 

[deleted15807]

Fact is, this guy has shown up, out of the blue, on at least three occasions since our initial encounter back in October (when I pointed out the hypocrisy of his making some ridiculous blanket condemnation of Obama as "the worst president ever in U.S. history" while challenging us to say two things nice about Trump)

I missed that one. Anytime they say "the worst president ever in US history" we know exactly what they mean exactly what "issue" they have with Obama we know exactly what they mean. Not nuclear physics. Worst than George W. Bush? Right. They scarcely offer any evidence for their conviction. It doesn't need proof. Hate doesn't need facts or proof.

Meanwhile we're supposed to think up something nice to say about America's first presidency built on the negation of America's first black president?

 

[b.c.]

Ah, conjugations! I learn so much here.

Is it time to get the troll cookies out again? Perhaps with ExLax? They can practice “conjugating” as they depart.

http://conjugator.reverso.net/conjugation-english-verb-shit.html

I missed that one. Anytime they say "the worst president ever in US history" we know exactly what they mean exactly what "issue" they have with Obama we know exactly what they mean. Not nuclear physics. Worst than George W. Bush? Right. They scarcely offer any evidence for their conviction. It doesn't need proof. Hate doesn't need facts or proof.

Meanwhile we're supposed to think up something nice to say about America's first presidency built on the negation of America's first black president?

And not just TRUMP'S candidacy and subsequent OCCUPANCY.

Ever SINCE Obama's election, the ENTIRE fkng Republican party and damn near EVERY one of them running for office, from dog catcher to congressman, have run on a dog whistle, campaign platform of "STOPPING OBAMA."

That's no lie. And not only is that a fkng disgrace but a DAMN sad commentary on the mentality of the party, their ideology, AND their constituency:

Notice that second ad... how he was going to do SO much for people's health care. THAT sure turned out to be a crock of SHIT, didn't it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Cassidy

"In September 2017, Cassidy and Lindsey Graham introduced legislation to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. The "Graham-Cassidy" bill would eliminate the ACA's marketplace subsidies, repeal the ACA's Medicaid expansion, and introduce a temporary block grant that would expire in 2026.[42] The legislation would also impose a per-enrollee cap on Medicaid funding.[42] The Kaiser Family Foundation noted that the legislation "would fundamentally alter the current federal approach to financing health coverage for more than 80 million people who have coverage through the ACA (Medicaid expansion or marketplace) or through the traditional Medicaid program."[42] An analysis by the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities found that the legislation "would cut federal health care funding by $299 billion relative to current law" in the year 2027 alone and estimated that it would leave 32 million more Americans without health insurance.[43] ... Donald Trump endorsed the bill

 

[chrisrobin]

You must have reloaded by now that the war isn't over, that Trump and the GOPP have opened up the old lines of hatred and bigotry - not to mention racist.
If they really had their way the Old South would rise again, the little tucked away groups of KKK would be more open and segregation would be introduced to keep the Aryan lines pure - oh - a bit like Hitler!

 

[b.c.]

"... at 2018’s CPAC last week, it at times felt like the loons had taken control of the place. The Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center, just outside of Washington, D.C., was crawling with white nationalists. We’re talking open bigots who promote the idea of a white ethno-state and spend a frightening amount of time fretting over anti-Semitic conspiracy theories."

"The Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks extremism, called this year’s gathering akin to “a carnival of conspiracy theorists, white nationalists, and mainstream Republicans all uniting under ...Trump.”


“In many ways,” the SPLC wrote, “CPAC has become an annual measure of how far the radical right has moved into the mainstream of the conservative right, especially in recent years as anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant and anti-LGBT groups have found political friends in the United States and Europe.”


"... Donald Trump also gave an anti-immigrant, lie-filled speech at CPAC. Here’s some of the people who went to the conference to cheer him on..."

There Sure Were A Bunch Of White Nationalists At CPAC, Huh? | HuffPost Richard Spencer wasn’t allowed inside, but a bunch of other racists, conspiracy theorists and extremists were.

 

[chrisrobin]

Trump is in favour of being allowed to bear arms
Trump is in favour of a trade war
Is trump in favour of the drop in stock since he opened his mouth a couple of weeks ago - after all huis claim was being responsible for the rise in shares... does he take the credit for the fall as well.
And talking of the right to bear arms the Donald probably rad this as the right to bare arms, bare legs and bare bosoms... after all a bear is a bear is a bare!
He expects to be taken seriously, the woman most close to him has left office (not even Melania could have bee that close (except for the once) leaving a void) Kelly admits to having the job from hell and all he thinks about is a free meal and a round of golf..

 

[b.c.]

Trump may not be the CAUSE of hate and racism in America, but he and conservatives most certainly USE it and employ it in their rhetoric.

Just as Trump did during his campaign and still does, thereby encouraging and legitimizing it (in minds of the LIKE MINDED at least) via the power of the very office he does such a disservice to, on a DAILY basis.

And in case anyone thinks that's an exaggeration:

There Sure Were A Bunch Of White Nationalists At CPAC, Huh? | HuffPost

So maybe that's why this particular bigot thought, "It's okay, I'm a fireman."

Kansas man defends hurling racial slurs and saliva at preschooler: 'It's okay, I'm a fireman!'

On a brighter note, seems the local authorities begged to DIFFER:

Child called N-word, spat on by first responder at Kansas Hooters | The Kansas City Star

 

[Klingsor]

Kansas man defends hurling racial slurs and saliva at preschooler: 'It's okay, I'm a fireman!'

Not for long.

 

[b.c.]

Florida Teacher Linked To White Supremacist Podcast Removed From The Classroom | HuffPost

Steve Bannon: 'Let Them Call You Racist; Wear It As A Badge Of Honor' | HuffPost

“The king of fake news and of white supremacists at a National Front summit — why am I not surprised?” asked Christophe Castaner, head of French President Emmanuel Macron’s Republic on the Move party.

 

[b.c.]

Assaults Increased When Cities Hosted Trump Rallies, Study Finds - The New York Times

 

[Max_Polo]

Assaults Increased When Cities Hosted Trump Rallies, Study Finds - The New York Times

Of course they did. Trump rallies inspired ANTIFA demonstrations and derivative assaults. No mystery here.

Come on guys - sometimes you make this too easy.

 

[b.c.]

Of course they did. Trump rallies inspired ANTIFA demonstrations and derivative assaults. No mystery here.

Come on guys - sometimes you make this too easy.

Contrary to what's written in the article, including Trump's OWN incitement of violent acts, YOUR conclusion is that ANTIFA is the cause. No surprise there.

Sort of like those you call "theoretical voters" who you suggest are too lazy to get an id.

Right. And I bet it was ANTIFA who stood on a NATIONAL stage and bragged about how he could SHOOT someone in the street and not lose one fkn supporter.