Some guy can walk around and say he's transgender for the sole purpose of trying to peep on women, and the police on the basis of questioning him can say that he's a lying sack of shit and throw his perv ass in jail.
How so? What right do the police have to make the determination that he's lying? If we accept, (and support, and celebrate) young people who, literally, wake up in the morning and decide to be female or male on a given day, how could we expect the police to contradict that person's decisions?
I know a couple transgender women (i.e., people with XY chromosomes who underwent procedures to live as women). One of them is very highly regarded in her field, a public figure, and no one pays any attention to her gender identity. Regardless of laws, you'd probably not blink an eye if you saw either of them walk into a women-only area. No one would. They dress and look like women. Why do they need a law that protects them?
They
don't. They
are women. So why force a social agenda? What's the point, other than to use it as a cause to attack social conservatives?
And....if we don't have to be concerned about sexual assaults, etc. perpetrated by pervy men gaining entry to women's rooms because, as the reasoning goes, those things are already and have always been illegal and criminal....can't we use the same justification if people are concerned about restroom violence against trans people? Beating someone up or murdering someone is already illegal and criminal. Why do we have to create a law to protect against what is already prohibited in the laws?
Basically, it's less about human rights and more about the cynical opportunity to attack social conservatives.