It was YOU who accused me of wanting "extra privileges for 'black folk'."
Had to go out for dinner and such so I haven't had time to address this.
Like your accusations that I pulled up replies of yours from an entirely different thread (also #fakenews), this one again stems for your challenges with reading comprehension. Here's what I wrote (with two words in bold for ya since bold is your thing).
"And if you're going to complain about a magistrate issuing a warrant for his arrest on the basis of video footage... that's the same way some of Deandre Harris's garage attackers got arrested. But again, in B.C. world, what's good for the goose need never apply to the gander.
You just looooove you some double standards. Do you think it's liberals that should have the extra priviledges, or just black folks?"
You complained that white supremacist types played amateur detectives resulting in charges being brought against Deandre Harris, but you've never complained about counterprotesters playing amateur detectives resulting in charges being brought against people who attacked counterprotesters (Deandre's garage attackers, that KKK clan head who was firing the gun, etc).
You come across as advancing an argument when people you agree with do sleuthing that it's just people trying to bring criminals to justice by assisting police, while when people you don't agree with do it, that sleuthing is some form of harassment via abusing the legal system.
That's your double standard and it has to apply on the basis of something. You either want to apply a double standard that favors liberals over conservatives, or you want to apply a double standard that favors blacks over whites. I'm accusing you of wanting extra privileges for someone, but there is no editing required to see that I clearly asked you for clarification about which you are favoring. If you think there's another way to categorize people who were instigating violence at this particular white supremacy rally which would make sense just let me know.
