TSA Pat Downs Are Part Of "Homosexual Agenda"

B_VinylBoy

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,363
Media
0
Likes
68
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
wrong, pat downs at night clubs are not mandated by the gov

They don't have to be mandatory on a federal level. Local and city police would have probable cause to yank a club's license to sell liquor or even be open if they allowed people to come in freely, without a patron's ID checked and being pat down for weapons or drugs. I've worked the night scene for over 20 years so I know this for a fact. Besides, there's a really high chance that a TSA pat down at an airport will not happen if you simply go through the machines.

Again... not unconstitutional.
 

B_OtterJoq

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Posts
912
Media
0
Likes
38
Points
163
Location
Minneapolis
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Sargon.. this is the equivalent of race baiting.. you are citing some fringe/pathetic/usual-blogs-that-you-haunt-as-gospel and stirring up the LPSG gay hive in these parts...

Everyone here is a bit more real than that... work on the important stuff... for once.


Oh, please, faceplant...even for you, that's stretching things.
 

vince

Legendary Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Posts
8,271
Media
1
Likes
1,675
Points
333
Location
Canada
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
Fuck the Constitution. What I want to know is, how much do they charge for these enhanced pat downs and do they take Diners Club? I'm changing planes at JFK in couple weeks and want the full treatment. I should phone CP and see if it's included with the business class ticket.

Speaking of pat downs.. If you ever have the chance to fly out of Istanbul Ataturk, do it. Those Turkish boys do an amazing cavity search.
 

Industrialsize

Mythical Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
22,244
Media
213
Likes
31,791
Points
618
Location
Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Fuck the Constitution. What I want to know is, how much do they charge for these enhanced pat downs and do they take Diners Club? I'm changing planes at JFK in couple weeks and want the full treatment. I should phone CP and see if it's included with the business class ticket.

Speaking of pat downs.. If you ever have the chance to fly out of Istanbul Ataturk, do it. Those Turkish boys do an amazing cavity search.
My Hottest Patdown:
Tribhuvan Airport
Kathmandu, Nepal
A small dark curtained off closet
me
and the hottest soldier in the Royal Nepali Army
He touched everything
he had a machine gun
 

Big_Red

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Posts
289
Media
22
Likes
145
Points
263
Location
Oshawa (Ontario, Canada)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I don't get why the poor and middle class are singled out, Big_Red.
What do you mean?
Ever hear of private jet passengers going through these idiot scanners, or EVER being searched for no reason?? It doesn't happen to first class/business class flights either, nor should it, given that no terrorist attack has ever been conducted by someone in first class, or business class. And do I need to mention the fact that less than 5% of all shipping containers (20 tons each) ever get screened? The screenings always have a basis in probable cause, as well. No fishing expeditions.

So, like it or not, while there isn't racial profiling in place, class profiling is, and is perfectly acceptable to the masses. And when these same assholes lose money mortgaging your future on risky bets in the real estate and stock markets, YOU pay for their losses.

Ok, let me get this straight. It is in people's best interest to have their airplane not blow up or be hijacked. People accomplish blowing up or hijacking a plane by hiding tools and bombs on their person. Many standard searching methods would not detect these items if they are well hidden. But you claim that search methods that would reveal them are "unreasonable"?

Please let me get this straight: It is also in the people's best interest to prevent bombings in public places, such as supermarkets and department stores. So, by your logic then, these scanners and such invasive searches should be instituted EVERYWHERE to prevent loss of life. Right? Or are people in supermarkets and department stores somehow less important than those on airplanes? Do tell.

This is really the crux of the argument. The TSA has two primary duties here: 1) Keeping everyone safe, 2) Respecting everyone's dignity and privacy as much as possible.
It's not surprising to see that "Adhering to the Constitution" is not amongst your stated primary duties of the TSA. I mean, who needs that useless, irrelevant piece of paper anyway? WE'RE AT WAR!!! :eek:

I numbered these in order of priority. I would agree with you, Big Red, IF and only IF you had a less invasive method of search which could still detect the dangerous implements people may attempt to bring onboard and keep all passengers safe. Do you?
No random searches. No fishing expeditions. No violation of probable cause, regardless of venue. No requirement for "papers, please". No exceptions. It's the law. The highest law of the land, in fact.

Yeah, and we can totally see who the fear has been instilled into. :rolleyes:
The same, healthy fear that any of the Framers had of tyrannical government. But, unlike you, I will NOT let an irrational, disproportional fear of loss of life permit me to give my power away to government, or to abrogate my rights under the Constitution. If you want to do either, that's your choice. Not mine. And it should never be forced on anyone who wishes to honor and obey the rule of law. End of story.
 

B_VinylBoy

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,363
Media
0
Likes
68
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Ever hear of private jet passengers going through these idiot scanners, or EVER being searched for no reason?? It doesn't happen to first class/business class flights either, nor should it, given that no terrorist attack has ever been conducted by someone in first class, or business class. And do I need to mention the fact that less than 5% of all shipping containers (20 tons each) ever get screened? The screenings always have a basis in probable cause, as well. No fishing expeditions.

Last time I checked, First Class & Business Class passengers also have to go through the same security. You must be confusing the security line with the actual line at the airport gate.

So, like it or not, while there isn't racial profiling in place, class profiling is, and is perfectly acceptable to the masses. And when these same assholes lose money mortgaging your future on risky bets in the real estate and stock markets, YOU pay for their losses.

Ironically, "class profiling" includes almost everyone who would have been targeted under racial profiling anyhow so for them it's not as if anything has changed.

Please let me get this straight: It is also in the people's best interest to prevent bombings in public places, such as supermarkets and department stores. So, by your logic then, these scanners and such invasive searches should be instituted EVERYWHERE to prevent loss of life. Right? Or are people in supermarkets and department stores somehow less important than those on airplanes? Do tell.

Perhaps not in a supermarket, but in some cities people are scanned and frisked down more than others. Many people (including myself) have stated that security guards administer similar enhanced pat downs to get into certain night clubs, sporting and concert events. This is nothing new to the majority of people in America.

It's not surprising to see that "Adhering to the Constitution" is not amongst your stated primary duties of the TSA. I mean, who needs that useless, irrelevant piece of paper anyway? WE'RE AT WAR!!!

We all view the same Constitution, and just because you're more squeamish about your body and privacy than others doesn't mean that they don't make it a primary concern. That's a very disingenuous statement.

The same, healthy fear that any of the Framers had of tyrannical government. But, unlike you, I will NOT let an irrational, disproportional fear of loss of life permit me to give my power away to government, or to abrogate my rights under the Constitution. If you want to do either, that's your choice. Not mine. And it should never be forced on anyone who wishes to honor and obey the rule of law. End of story.

This is not a sign of tyrannical government at all, so stop with the red herrings. TSA pat downs are not a requirement to fly... they are the alternative for those who don't want to go through the scanners. You don't want another man putting his hand on your inseam, then go through the machine. If neither one is up to your liking, then find another mode of transportation.
 

Big_Red

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Posts
289
Media
22
Likes
145
Points
263
Location
Oshawa (Ontario, Canada)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Last time I checked, First Class & Business Class passengers also have to go through the same security. You must be confusing the security line with the actual line at the airport gate.

Nope. Sorry. The security procedures are NOT the same. And thanks for strategically deleting my point about private jet passengers not being subject to the same security checks as the rest of us mere mortals. Bin Laden family after 9/11, anyone?

The same goes for my comment about shipping containers. Clearly you don't actually have any real security concerns, otherwise you would have addressed these two critical points I made.

Ironically, "class profiling" includes almost everyone who would have been targeted under racial profiling anyhow so for them it's not as if anything has changed.
That's demonstrably incorrect. If you can prove otherwise, please go ahead.

Perhaps not in a supermarket, but in some cities people are scanned and frisked down more than others. Many people (including myself) have stated that security guards administer similar enhanced pat downs to get into certain night clubs, sporting and concert events. This is nothing new to the majority of people in America.
Once again, you completely fail to understand the distinction between the public and private sectors. The Constitution applies to the former ONLY.

We all view the same Constitution, and just because you're more squeamish about your body and privacy than others doesn't mean that they don't make it a primary concern. That's a very disingenuous statement.
Actually, your statement is the one that's disingenous and, honestly, flat out ludicrous! Hmmm... should we apply community standards to searches just like we do to obscenity? :lmao: :rofl:

Do you understand what "probable cause" means? Because going by everything you've written again and again to my previous comments, clearly you do not.

This is not a sign of tyrannical government at all, so stop with the red herrings. TSA pat downs are not a requirement to fly... they are the alternative for those who don't want to go through the scanners. You don't want another man putting his hand on your inseam, then go through the machine. If neither one is up to your liking, then find another mode of transportation.
Okay, I'll try to make this as easy to follow as possible:
Some form of search IS a requirement for some people who are randomly chosen for screening. Probable cause is irrelevant. And THAT is a clear demonstration of a tyrannical government that is hell bent on breaking the law, rather than enforcing it. And your "go find another mode of transportaton" argument is getting a bit tired by now, don't ya think?
 

B_VinylBoy

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,363
Media
0
Likes
68
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Nope. Sorry. The security procedures are NOT the same.

Ummmmm... yes they are. Where I live, I've gone through similar pat downs. I've had my body pat down with two hands from head to toe, and a hand gently go up and down my inseam, which is precisely the procedure described by the TSA agent in the John Tyner video. Who are you to tell me that I haven't, unless you've been the one frisking me at almost every night club I've been at over the last two years? :rolleyes:

And thanks for strategically deleting my point about private jet passengers not being subject to the same security checks as the rest of us mere mortals. Bin Laden family after 9/11, anyone? The same goes for my comment about shipping containers. Clearly you don't actually have any real security concerns, otherwise you would have addressed these two critical points I made.

There's no strategy in deleting part of your post. I'm trying to save space in my own. :rolleyes:
And I don't have to address every single ASCII character you type. In fact, I already know that much baggage isn't screened as heavily as some people would like. Then again, they go through machines with much stronger x-rays so that could be part of the reasoning.

That's demonstrably incorrect. If you can prove otherwise, please go ahead.

It depends on what you're using as "class". You haven't declared any particular one, however going by your rants one could assume that you're talking "rich vs. poor". If that was the case, then look up the embodiment of people who compose of the "poor class". Look at them by their race and you'll see a mass amount of minorities, or the same ones who would be unfairly targeted in racial profiling. That is, unless, you want to argue against recent census and poverty statistics and I know you don't want to do that.

Once again, you completely fail to understand the distinction between the public and private sectors. The Constitution applies to the former ONLY.

Bullshit. Not every function at a night club, sporting or concert is strictly a public or private affair. In fact, in a private scenario the people running the event can administer even more stricter search guidelines. Case in point, I know a private party for gay men in New York that actually requires them to expose themselves before gaining entry. Obviously you couldn't do that on a public scale.

Actually, your statement is the one that's disingenous and, honestly, flat out ludicrous! Hmmm... should we apply community standards to searches just like we do to obscenity? :lmao: :rofl:

There's no disingenuousness in saying that I, personally, have no problems with the enhanced pat downs administered by the TSA. Just because you do is your problem. You're the one seeing it as an invasion of YOUR rights. Don't speak for myself or anyone else on this issue.

Do you understand what "probable cause" means? Because going by everything you've written again and again to my previous comments, clearly you do not.

Well, if you want me to be blunt how about I put it to you this way.
Some people want assurance that the plane they get on is safe. Your fears and paranoia over an enhanced pat down doesn't trump another person's need for passenger security under the legal law. Flying is a privilege, not a right in this country. And contrary to your propaganda, the TSA isn't doing anything different that you can't be exposed to already on a public scale. So if you don't like it, then find another means for travel or stay home.

Okay, I'll try to make this as easy to follow as possible:
Some form of search IS a requirement for some people who are randomly chosen for screening. Probable cause is irrelevant. And THAT is a clear demonstration of a tyrannical government that is hell bent on breaking the law, rather than enforcing it. And your "go find another mode of transportaton" argument is getting a bit tired by now, don't ya think?

IMO, if you got up in front of a security guard and started "showing your ass" about full body scanners and frisk downs, I'd be a little suspicious of you myself. But that's besides the point. Does this mean we won't see you flying the friendly skies anymore? Please let the rest of us know so we can plan our trips accordingly. :rolleyes:
 

FuzzyKen

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Posts
2,045
Media
0
Likes
98
Points
193
Gender
Male

I was hoping that when the senile fossil Fred Phelps finally died off that it would be the last of this moronic grandstanding on the part of the religious right. We had and survived Anita Bryant, we had the late Ed Davis, former Los Angeles Chief of Police, we had Jerry Falwell who insisted a character "Tinkie Winkie" was a pure indoctrination of infants world wide into homosexuality and now we have another ignorant bafoon opening his stupid mouth and trying to find some other looney toons to support his bizarre claims. Hey, I would feel honored to know that my cock and balls were being felt up by a gay person. That means at least one of us would be getting something out of it.
 

b.c.

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Posts
20,540
Media
0
Likes
21,780
Points
468
Location
at home
Verification
View
Gender
Male
This is not a sign of tyrannical government at all, so stop with the red herrings. TSA pat downs are not a requirement to fly... they are the alternative for those who don't want to go through the scanners. You don't want another man putting his hand on your inseam, then go through the machine. If neither one is up to your liking, then find another mode of transportation.

I agree. No one is FORCING him to fly. See? It's a "free country" after all. :tongue:
 

vince

Legendary Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Posts
8,271
Media
1
Likes
1,675
Points
333
Location
Canada
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
First and business class passengers go through the same security checks as those riding in coach. The class warfare angle here is a weak argument. Should folks who fly a Piper Cub be frisked to prevent them blowing themselves up?
 
Last edited:

JTalbain

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2005
Posts
1,786
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
258
Age
34
Big Red: I was going to address your points, but it seems everyone has beaten me to it. I think we've actually reached the point where the same advice that applies to those bitching about locker room nudity applies to you: Get over yourself. Act like an adult and get on with your life. That is all.