Don't be tiresomely pedantic if you know what I'm talking about. Men have a lot of anatomical structures that are solely for the purpose of ejaculating semen, including muscles that propel the ejaculate away from the body and
structures that create the fluid. These structures are obvious and don't exist in women. You conveniently left them out of your post.
The "ejaculatory tubing" that I'm talking about are the two
ejaculatory ducts (ED in the MR image, below the bladder) that are connected to the urethra from the seminal vesicles that create the ejaculatory fluid, along with the prostate. Men's urethra's have two other tubes connected to it, not just the single one to the bladder. A woman's urethra is only connected to her bladder. Those "
tubes."
These tubes that sometimes get painfully blocked and require surgery because it causes infertility because the ejaculate cannot travel through them to the urethra.
If a woman ejaculates from her urethra like a man, then she should have ejaculatory ducts. Women's ejaculatory ducts would then get blocked too, causing us pain, requiring surgery to fix. Except women don't have structures attached to the urethra that produce ejaculate. Women don't have ducts that carry the ejaculate to the urethra for expulsion during orgasm either. We don't have extraneous "ejaculatory tubing."
I concede that the vans deferens propels sperm forward, not semen. I was not paying attention and I apologize.
I said that you were wrong about anatomy because you claimed that the vans deferens was not a muscular structure, which is false. Fluids move through the various "tubes" in our body using muscles, such as blood, which is propelled by the heart. The vans deferens is lined in smooth muscle that propels the sperm forward by a pulsing action.
In your description of ejaculation, you've left out the seminal vesicle which is the main missing feature that a woman would need to "squirt" an actual ejaculate. Women don't actually produce ejaculate, we just get lubricated. We don't have a comparable anatomical part. The seminal vesicle is the structure in men that creates the fluid that the sperm swim in. Women don't need it because we produce no sperm. There are two "tubes" called ejaculatory ducts that are connected to a man's urethra that carry this ejaculate to the urethra that are missing in women. REALLY obvious during a dissection.
Now Fleur actually didn't say that she saw herself ejaculate, just that she got the bed very wet. I don't doubt that women can get very wet through lubrication. Skene's gland produces lucrication that is mostly plasma, of which we have plenty in our bodies. It just doesn't contain a holding tank and way of propelling that ejaculate away from the body.
I wrote that Skene's gland was "passive" because it doesn't use muscles that could ejaculate it away from the body. It works like the nose. When your nose is dry, mucous isn't ejaculated from the tissues of your nose, it is simply secreted, which makes sense for both the nose and the vagina because the area the needs lubrication is where the glands are located. Ejaculation away from the structure would defeat the purpose! Even if you wanted to ejaculate mucous from your nose using only the structures within your nose (not by sneezing) you wouldn't be able to to do it because there is no musculature there to propel it, no tube lined with muscles. Skene's gland is the same. It does not work that way.
I am confused, do you think that women ejaculate from the urethra or Skene's gland?
I think it's posible some intersex individuals may have the ability to squirt like a man, with actual ejaculate if a person has developed a vagina and a prostate, seminal vesicles, and ejaculatory ducts also. Such a person would not be fertile.
I doubt it will get accepted...as you have no proof for your claims or empirical data.
