so you mean that if kids watches porn is considered pedophile?? they even can see porn on national geography between animals, why all this avoiding on such a natural and human thing?
What I learned is that the more you hide from kids the worse it is, I think they should see how human body work and reproduce...with all naturality because porn is sex, if I had kids I would prefer to let them watch porn rather than violence.
If most of the people could act with such normality about this, kids would see porn like they see cartoons with the passing years....
Perhaps I didn't make a very good job of explaing my point.
What I was trying to say is, the reason given for banning kiddie porn - ie pornography which INVOLVES children - is that children are harmed in the process.
And obviously no one is going to argue to the contrary, at least in public, if they ever want to get re-elected.
That was all I meant.
And the fact that no-one is going to publicly oppose this view means it is the obvious premise to cite if you wish to introduce a degree of censorship, but that once this censorship becomes accepted, then more and more things will be added to the proscibed list.
And who could be trusted to administer such a system, and what rights as citizens would we have to appeal if we disagreed.
I agree that policing what children access over the net - and any other form of media - should be the responsibility of the parents; and I am totally opposed to any form of censorship