Unarmed White Man Shot Dead in Dallas, TX
- Thread starter KTF40
- Start date
"Off-duty Dallas police officer Antonio Hudson shot and killed Andrew Scott Gaynier, who was unarmed, in an Oak Cliff street on Sunday night after the Gaynier apparently charged the officer, according to police.
A little after 6 p.m., Hudson responded to a 911 dispatch about a man "walking up and down the street making lewd comments to females," according to a police statement. The officer drove to the location and found Gaynier, who fit dispatch's description.
According to police, Hudson saw Gaynier try to get into a moving vehicle with a family inside. "The officer made contact with the suspect out of concern for the safety of the family," police said. "The officer gave loud verbal commands, but the suspect refused to comply."
WFAA reports, using an unnamed source, that the man shouted "Shoot me!" twice, made a "war cry" and then "rushed" the officer. The same source told the station the officer shot the man four times, three times in the chest and once in the arm. Gaynier was pronounced dead at Methodist Hospital, according to police.
Hudson, who was not injured, will be placed on administrative leave.
Beyond the statement they released, police declined to comment specifically about the shooting."
Taken from the link at the beginning of this thread. Yeah i don't think this was a good example to use OP. The stories aren't all that similar.
A little after 6 p.m., Hudson responded to a 911 dispatch about a man "walking up and down the street making lewd comments to females," according to a police statement. The officer drove to the location and found Gaynier, who fit dispatch's description.
According to police, Hudson saw Gaynier try to get into a moving vehicle with a family inside. "The officer made contact with the suspect out of concern for the safety of the family," police said. "The officer gave loud verbal commands, but the suspect refused to comply."
WFAA reports, using an unnamed source, that the man shouted "Shoot me!" twice, made a "war cry" and then "rushed" the officer. The same source told the station the officer shot the man four times, three times in the chest and once in the arm. Gaynier was pronounced dead at Methodist Hospital, according to police.
Hudson, who was not injured, will be placed on administrative leave.
Beyond the statement they released, police declined to comment specifically about the shooting."
Taken from the link at the beginning of this thread. Yeah i don't think this was a good example to use OP. The stories aren't all that similar.
For what it's worth, I'd venture that an actual racist (as the jury is apparently still out on me lol) might take an article like this
BREAKING: Ferguson’s Michael Brown PICTURED Flashing GANG SIGNS | The Gateway Pundit
and say, "See?!?!? He musta been up to no good. Looks like a hoodlum."
My guess? He was acting like a douche and posing to look cool. Lord knows I can empathize with that more than a little bit.
Note: lifted from a facebook "friend" who offered up something along the lines of my hypothetical post.
But by all means, let's continue to float the narrative that I either refuse to believe racism still exists, or that it ever existed in the first place
BREAKING: Ferguson’s Michael Brown PICTURED Flashing GANG SIGNS | The Gateway Pundit
and say, "See?!?!? He musta been up to no good. Looks like a hoodlum."
My guess? He was acting like a douche and posing to look cool. Lord knows I can empathize with that more than a little bit.
Note: lifted from a facebook "friend" who offered up something along the lines of my hypothetical post.
But by all means, let's continue to float the narrative that I either refuse to believe racism still exists, or that it ever existed in the first place
Last edited:
What does "ghetto" means? - its a closed area, where only jews live - in generall it has nothing to do with poverty.
One reason for all the progroms wasnt only the pseudo reason that "jews killed jesus" but mainly that many christs tried to get rid of their debts - a death jew cant demand his money back.
Jews are good at trade, that was the main reason for a rulor to get thrm in their realm. Also was it only allowed to jews to lend money with interests.
Not only russian jews, but nearly EVERY russian had to libve in poverty.
Also do i dont believe that you try to compare the poverty of an everage with the live poverty of a slave...
You mix antisemitism with poverty - but i dont mind. Cause you try to blame me on everything... thats why, this time you choose jews, to follow your agenda... shame on you.
Another big difference between the Holocaust and slavery is the time it has last.
A bit more as five years of holocaust werent enough to distroy a whole culture. In special not cause it was only limited to europe - a place where jews lived for more then 2000 years.
Different to this are 300 years of slavery plus the abduction from thwir native land more then enough to dustroy a culture.
And thats a problem only black americans have - white americans are the dominating culture, asians, jews and hispanics in america have their own cultural background.
The only thing blacks have is the memorry of slavery. A bit less to define your culture.
Drifterwood
Superior Member
What the fuck are you on?
You said that Jews had always been the wealthy in society. I have pointed out to you that that statement is incorrect.
That was the sum total of our discussion.
But yes, I do find your ignorance shameful.
Drifterwood
Superior Member
Boo hoo - are you playing the victim card?
Pathetic.
I find your ignorance offensive, especially then considering the conclusions you try to draw. That isn't hate.
:Thinkingof_:
Guess we'll just ignore this little unfortunate truth that so many are ignorant to....or too blinded by their privilege to acknowledge. And then there are those who bolster the "get over it" mentality... Takes a lot to make me hate someone...but you all are tiptoeing closer and closer to that line...
Last edited:
This rates fucking high on the list for silly comparisons or analogies.
1) Black cop shoots crazy fuck that happens to be white; who while violent was unarmed.
2) White cop shoots black kid that does not appear to be doing anything beyond being in a verbal pissing contest
A) White people are not mad because cop was protecting an innocent family
B) African Americans through out the country are pissed off because this is not a first. It is almost a regular event.
Unless an investigation or a video pops up to show other wise, the cop looks like he is wrong in Ferguson because there are multiple witnesses stating the kid did jump or rush the cop.
If he did what the eye witnesses claim or allege the cop needs to go down.
1) Black cop shoots crazy fuck that happens to be white; who while violent was unarmed.
2) White cop shoots black kid that does not appear to be doing anything beyond being in a verbal pissing contest
A) White people are not mad because cop was protecting an innocent family
B) African Americans through out the country are pissed off because this is not a first. It is almost a regular event.
Unless an investigation or a video pops up to show other wise, the cop looks like he is wrong in Ferguson because there are multiple witnesses stating the kid did jump or rush the cop.
If he did what the eye witnesses claim or allege the cop needs to go down.
I've refused to answer many of your questions due to the ignorance you have displayed on here. It's not just one, there are tons.Oh....you just refuse to answer that ONE question? LMFAO....you guys...
I answered every single one of your questions until I realized 1) you're a complete ignoramus and 2) your entire posting style is an attempt to overwhelm those you disagree with by asking moronic questions without any logical intent.
And please don't criticize me for cherry picking facts when you don't know any facts. You're the same person who said Martin bashed Zimmerman's head against the grass, when eye witness testimony and Zimmerman both said it was the curb and not the grass (even the prosecution never argued in favor of your lies concerning the grass), you accuse the police of staging the Zimmerman photos with zero evidence to back it up, and then claimed to show me a link where 1% of police victims were white when no such evidence has ever existed.
I base my agenda and ideology on facts. Unlike you, I don't resort to hatred and ignorance to support my views.
What we have learned is your hateful little individual who bases all your entire arguments on emotion instead of facts and evidence.
Well in the case of believing the Zimmerman photos were staged by the police dept, yes you, a black person, has made it all up. Or the grass, or the antagonization examples, the statistics regarding white victims, and pretty much everything else.
Although honestly, part of me wonders whether you are even black and not some type of person who is racist against blacks pretending to be a black person in order to troll the internet in attempt to show black people in the most negative light possible. I say that because the the things you say on here are so batshit crazy no person of reasonable intelligence could possibly believe half the shit you say.
Yeah, claiming the Zimmerman pics were staged by the police dept is a "well reasoned argument". No surprise you would see things that way, you're as much of a lost cause as he is.
I guess the fact that a larger number (percent) of the participants in this conversation favor my argument over yours....just means we're all equally delusional. You, and those who think like you, belong to a very small minority of people...and it obviously upsets you to see that play out here and on a larger scale. I assume you feel that you possess intellectual superiority over anyone who doesn't share your view on this case. That is usually the case...and like so many other ways you've expressed your true colors...I am not surprised...
slurper_la
Superior Member
Wow KTF is on a roll... A cussing others of the very behavior and stupidity he displays in every post. WOW!!!!
Did you read To Kill A Mockingbird? Expecting a fair result and vigorously defending what you believe to be right are not mutually inclusive. I can only speak for myself, but I've yet to post in a thread with the even a remote expectation of being in the majority.
Stand by your beliefs in an argument. Don't appeal to the size of your mob as proof of that belief.
Judging by who is supporting you, people like Stormfront and Balsary, you're not exactly arguing against delusional behavior here.
It's funny because people like me and who think like me also acquitted George Zimmerman. So no, can't really say I'm upset at all nor am I in a minority. Although I'm sure you had to cry yourself to sleep that night in a fit of anger.
I possess an intellectual superiority over people like you who use fantasy and lies to support their views.
It's funny, because one would think you arguing against someone who uses facts and logic to support their views would catch you off guard and surprise you. Since you act like someone who has never had to engage with someone with an IQ over 10.
I wonder how many like you would feel if that same statement was made with "the mob" being the key handlers of these cases...
"Oh they FBI and local authorities say he was justified because blah blah blah, so it must be true"...
Similar threads
