Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Straight Adult Websites' started by _avg_, Nov 10, 2009.
Ridiculously fit model? Or computer-generated image? If real, what's her name?
Fit? She looks anorexic to me.
Looks to me like she has overdone the most efficient diet, photoshop.
She could do with a fish supper.
i CAN'T SEE ANYTHING GOOD about her
Inner thighs look really pixelated. I'm going with faked.
Fake or not, that's a hot pic. Even if it is photoshopped a bit, I would like to think that a good portion of her isn't photoshopped, which is incredibly impressive. I know we all have different tastes on what constitutes a "good body" or "hot", but this is right up my alley.
Thanks for posting.
Someone give this girl a bagel.
gives me nothing. not desirable body in my opinion.
real but touched up with a computer.
That is a Computer made render.... I have the original HD version somewhere I will try and find it
It could be Photoshopped, but I doubt it, as the arms would show the same distortions as her torso, without an awful lot of effort, though it can be done. That said, I've been with several women whose waists are wasp thin, but taper into a normal set of hips, as this model shows. And frequently they also showed a rather nice wide gap between their legs, as does this girl. My guess is that's just how she's built. And I've also known women who were even thinner than her--they were somewhat disturbing in their trimness.
just to show what photoshop is capable to do....
YouTube - photoshop girl
which means: dont take anything for granted on the internet
theres nothing real about that picture. it's a 100% computer generated image most likely made with "poser"
check out www.renderosity.com
Fit is English slang.
short for "fit to fuck".
nothing to do with physical health or state.
Well the editor of the COD has spoken so it must be so. No doubt he pronoubces milk as mik and refers to women as babes.
None of those renders match the quality of the pic I linked, if indeed that is a render.
I'm not really interested in speculation: I want to know if this is actually rendered or not. And if not, who the real-life model is (whether she's been significantly 'touched-up' or not).
i'm not speculating - this IS a render.
first of all, because it's obvious, when you have some experience with computer generated images and second, because the original image (with variations) can be found on renderosity somewhere.
It's CGI. There was a thread on another site about it a while ago. The original artist was cited on DeviantArt. Pretty sexy though...try finding something like that in real life though! Impossible!