Uncommon??

Discussion in 'The Healthy Penis' started by captwinky, Dec 30, 2006.

  1. captwinky

    captwinky Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    33
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    I was just wondering how meny out there were like me or atleast how common or uncommon my situation is.

    I was born partaly circumsizd. My foreskin dosent really covered my head even when soft. More like a little turtle neck. My mom figured there was no reason to get me cercumsized. she said there was a name for it but I cant remember. My friends call it my "mud flap" My ex use to say it was because I have a large head and there wasent enough skin to hold it.

    I guess I was wondering is this common? I dont mind it at all but I havent really heard or seem anyone else like me.
     
  2. monsternmypant

    monsternmypant New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Messages:
    188
    Likes Received:
    4
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    DC, USA
    No one is born "partially circumsized." You may have a short foreskin while others like me may have very long foreskins, but circumcision is a human act, not a fluke of genetics. Enjoy what you have!
     
  3. chico8

    chico8 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    761
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Chico
    I've seen a few like that, not extremely common but not rare either.

    I agree, you're not "partially circumcised" you just have a short foreskin. Consider yourself lucky for not having a scalpel near your dick when you were a newborn.
     
  4. TeflonDon

    TeflonDon New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Messages:
    223
    Likes Received:
    1
    Gender:
    Male
    I was born with very little foreskin as well. I did not know there was a name for that ;) I'm going to have to search for it now hehe

    Teflon
     
  5. Ionto

    Ionto New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    639
    Likes Received:
    1
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Paris
    Very interesting, as the replies. I also have a short foreskin. Soft it covers the rim and a bit more, so it leaves about two thirds of the head exposed. And hard, it disappears completely (more than yours in your photo).

    But there''s a big difference. Until I was about 10 or 11 my foreskin covered all the head, and it was only when I started growing at puberty that the foreskin didn't seem to grow as fast. Like you, I ve got a big head, and obviously the foreskin didn't keep up with it.

    As a teenager I was very hung up about this, but when I did my military service I saw others with pretty short foreskins too, so I realise it's not so uncommon as you think. In fact, mine is shorter than some circumcised guys. But the fact that yours was short from birth is a new twist.
     
  6. captwinky

    captwinky Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    33
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    Sorry about the "partially circumcised", Bad choice of words. I guess there is a name for being born with shorter forskin.

    Either way thank for the responses I'm glad to know there are others like this too.
     
  7. jafar

    jafar Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Canada
    I am the same as Ionto. My foreskin only cover about half of my glans when I am soft, and automatically completely rolls back when I am erect. I can also wear my foreskin completely retracted when soft if I want to. It also started when I was a teenager, before which my glans was completely covered by the foreskin when flaccid.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted