What do you mean why should it change? You're proposing a new system and have yet to identify where these funds will come from. You are supporting a system of change as evident by this proposal going up for a national vote, so don't ask me why should it change, that makes zero sense.
I'm reading the rest of your responses and I'm feeling the same puzzled reaction to each reply. My initial question was simply to understand where the funding would come from to give away free money and you've yet to answer other than more taxes from a system that is reducing its work force. Obviously, I'm not satisfied with that response so no reason to go into a tit for tat discussion on why giving away free money incentivizes people not to work.
Why should the way i finance a system change, just cause i change the way of spending?
Currently, many people get supported by unemployent payments, you dont have to pay for a kindergarten and if you start an education, the goverment pays you as well... And there are many many other payments and services. A lot of these would be no longer required, these money could be used for the basic income.
Currently do we tax labour higher then interests. Why? You have to do nothing for an income out of interests, something in total different to income out of labour - make it at least equal. It would increase the tax income.
Even if you argue, that the unemploymency would go up. It doesnt mean that the tax income would go down.
Currently do get only 50% of all income out of labour get taxed - so, even if EVERYONE who earns too less to pay taxes would quit their jobs, the tax income out of labour wouldnt change. But i doubt that so many people would quit their jobs and that would mean, the tax income would increase, cause in the new system every income gets taxed. No matter how small...
So, again: why should their be a problem to finance it?