9
He answer to your question is something you can find by using some very minimal intelligence. The ratio of small, average, and large specimens will be the same for circumcised and uncircumcised penises within a given population. What I mean by that is that if you take a survey of male genitalia sizes characteristics you would want to compare individuals of the same race and geographic location. The reason for this is you would need to exclude all other variables but the one you are testing with your hypothesis. That is the basics of scientific method.
It is safe to say that your parents choosing to have you circumcised or not has nothing to do with why the size of your penis will be when you reach sexual maturity. I mean if you think about my two following statements you will be able to easily understand what I mean. "I have a big penis because it is uncircumcised." "My penis is uncircumcised because it is big". Neither one of these statements makes any sense at all. Neither one of these statements could possibly be supported by any rational person. Our physical appearance being modified by ourselves or others does not alter our genetic code. Circumcision is not a causation of growth or maturity. It is an effect of a post gestation surgical procedure.
wat? you got all that from "any guys with uncut cocks (big)?"? lol not bashing or anything, just impressed
Yupany guys with uncut cocks (big)?
great dong!
Not huge here, but I am Uncut