First I have to ask the age old question. Are those of us that still have our original equipment referred to as uncircumcised or uncut. I have heard many "Intact" guys refer to it as that. Or perhaps "Non-Circumcised". How about "Foreskin Enabled". They argument is that you can't "un" do being cut or circumcised. I know that it has become accepted terminology so do "we" try to change it to a more accurate description or just let it go? Doesn't really matter much to me, I am jsut very thankful that even though I am middle age and living in the United States my parents were very forward thinking and left myself and two younger brothers just the way we were born even though my father was circumcised.
All that being said, I am usually (99% of the time) the first guy with a foreskin the ladies I have had intimate times with have been with. Once over the initial curiosity and sometimes a little shock, they are very comfortable with it and actully enjoy having a good time with it during HJs and oral. Most have said it definitely felt better during intercourse, a few said they didn't feel any difference. Without saying anything negative about my past partners the once that did not feel any difference were the ones that were a "looser" fit. Now I am not that hung but most find me very filling. That is my experience in this area and looking forward to hearing what others have experienced.