Circumcised penises are more "sensitive," but that isn't like some "special needs" case.
you do realize theres no possible way that your "glans" are more sensitive than a uncut guys.. right? your glans rubbing all day de-sensitizes them....im not tryin to start a cut VS uncut debate, but jesus, use your head..theres no way the head of a cut dick is more sensitive than an uncut one...
if i roll my foreskin back and drop my dick back in my boxer briefs, its so sensitive i cringe when i walk, but if i keep it like that fora few mins, i get used to it.... does that make any sense to you? your penis has become less sensitive over years and years of friction and rubbing on jeans/underwear
Oh, I agree with the premise, that the exposed glans makes it easier to get untimely spontaneous erections, and makes them harder to control. It could have been a factor in getting erections in class that quickly grow into full-on bonersthe lengthening penis rubs on one's pants, arousing it even harder.
And the rubbing doesn't that much "desensitize" the penis. My point is that we get used to it, and a little natural walking rubbing doesn't turn us on so much, if we don't want it to, if it's not too much to mentally control, after one finally gets used to puberty and gains some with-age control. Yeah, I suspect a circumcised penis has a more sensitive erection hair-trigger, but that doesn't at all mean we need "special" underwear. It's a proper "enhancement" apparently condoned in the Bible. And it's not just a "religious" thing with many people, but the "religious" or "American" thing or "traditional" thing to do, to be circumcised automatically as a baby.